Top Chef Vegas Ep. #3 09/02/09 (spoilers)
Interesting start! Mark Peel as Guest Judge for the Quickfire, which is to create an "out of this world" dish with potatoes.
Ash can't make sweet potato ice cream, but somehow, his puree ends up being Top 3!
Jessie is in the bottom 3 again - I'm thinking she's a goner very soon. Preeti almost screws Ashley by using the wrong water to poach her asparagus - but Ashley's gnocchi pulls a Top 3 status.
Jennifer C. wins with her mussels - and WHAT a surprise - Michael I. is an a$$hat commenting about her win. He *really* has a major problem with her, doesn't he?
The Elimination Challenge is cooking for 300 Air Force servicemen and women...
-
I was in Atlanta this past weekend and stopped into a place for a glass of wine and did not realize until I saw him that it was Eli's restaurant. It's a nice little place. And the bartender/staff were all nice and the menu looked good (we had dinner reservations at Rathbun's so did not eat there). Eli is much more attractive in person than on TV.
-
›8 Replies
Ok, here's the "who does cheftestant __" remind you of comparison du jour:
Mike Isabella and Syndrome
A little bit looks, a little bit attitude.
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
i don't know, something about the dark-haired, long sideburns, heavyset Southern guy thing they both have going on. but it's funny because i just had a totally different, bizarre thought when i looked at Eli's bio on Bravo's website. in that photo, he looks like the love child of Corey Feldman and Johnny Galecki (from The Big Bang Theory).
-
-
-
-
-
Top Chef odds from the Wynn Sports Book. Looks like they were done after week 1.
http://www.vegaschatter.com/story/200...
In handicapping the rest of the season I think it would take a major disaster for Voltaggio the Younger, Jen and Kevin not to end up in the final three.
You never know though, at this time last season I don't think too many people thought Carla had the slightest chance. It's still very early.
To me, Voltaggio the Elder, Michael and Ashley seem most likely to pounce if one of the elite makes a mistake. I have a feeling Robin might surprise as well.›2 Replies -
OK, I think that everyone has missed the most important moment of this episode! What is with Padma dripping legs and sex from the jeep/transport! Seriously a leopard miniskirt in an airplane hangar. Was she there to "entertain" the troups? She looked so hot! (Much hotter than Jen being bossy). So much for this being a cooking show:)
›13 Replies-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
i was actually coming on here to comment on that but NOT in a good way. i don't hate her. don't normally care much nor am easily offended but come on she looked like a ridiculous hooker. and it was an airforce base. dress appropriately. i was embarrassed for her and taken aback.
-
-
-
-
-
re: dave_c
Interesting how many male posters are perfectly comfortable throwing out unbridled compliments to Padma for her sex appeal while downplaying any other role she might play.
And at the same time also interesting to note how many male posters are expressing resentful jibes at Jen's talent, confidence and power.
I don't know if they are the same posters. I'm just saying.
-
re: chicgail
I've never commented on the sex appeal of any TV personality (I find such comments distasteful in the context of CH).
Again, where do you get that Jen has some extra power that other contestants don't have? If anything, she's still an employee while there are others who are quite successful as their own bosses. If she were so confident and powerful, she ought to own her own joint.
-
re: Ericandblueboy
I don't think I directed my comment to you or anyone else personally. You can take it that way if you wish, but it wasn't my intention.
As I said above, Jen demonstrated power and confidence as Exec Chef. She knew what she was doing. She didn't hesitate to make things happen. She was impressive in managing the kitchen and the other contestants. I call that power.
How she handles her career and how she is managing her own position is her own business. Sometimes there are good reasons for completing or extending a mentorship under the right person.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I sort of guessed that something wasn't going to go as usual when Padma didn't say "congratulations, you four had the best dishes" or something to that effect when they brought the first group into the room. Anyone else catch that?
I really enjoyed seeing a little bit more of the deliberations that go on at judges' table. I like when they have extended episodes and show us more of what goes on.
-
My thoughts on this episode.
- My 2 favorites Jen and Michael doing their thing.
- Was I the only one turned on when Jen was acting badass as Exec Chef?
- Pasta salad? LOL....last point: Michael I. was being an a$$hole but I think you guys have it all wrong saying his "favoritism" comment was in regards to Jen's gender.
He follows up his little sneer by saying "Whatever, whatever, so if I put a little potato broth on my plate I'm going to win?". I guess he meant the judges have a bias towards brothy, liquidy dishes (which she has prepared multiple times ie. ceviches, emulsions etc...).Dumb comment, reeks of being a sore loser but don't think it was sexist.
›13 Replies-
-
re: Evilbanana11
Jen is the leader even though I wish she'd smile a bit more.
Kevin is one to watch for sure but can he shave?
One of the brothers , the one who didnt win last night, didn't look too thrilled when his brother emerged victorious. sour grapes there. he and jen can take a smilig class together.
and pasta salad? really?-
re: HabaneroJane
The editors are throwing in shots of the other brother looking severe, no matter which brother's doing what. He may have been looking un-thrilled just because he didn't know how his dish fared yet/if he was in the bottom -- nothing to do with sour grapes about his little brother.
Other than Michael saying back in ep1 that he's younger, his brother already has his own restaurant, and they're both competitive, I don't get the impression there's anything particularly dysfunctional about their rivalry. IIRC, Bryan wanted to work with his brother last night, but Michael I jumped in.
-
re: Evilbanana11
I agree - I am not sure as to how anyone who assume that was a sexist comment?
(I'm not saying he's not - but that particular comment certainly wasn't)
I like Jen I think she's very good, but I hope she starts to expand her repetoire a bit - She has yet to do a non-seafood dish if I'm not mistaken
-
-
-
-
re: reiflame
Sexism may or may not be more or less than an irritant - probably to Gloria Steinem its a sin against God, deserving of a wrathful spite from above. To others, its water off a duck's back -call the guy an a**-hole and ignore him. In the end, the guy has to cook. The chattering just make us root against him, and judging from his bad salad, the chattering is only going to last a few more episodes.. and his exit will be one teeny bit of evidence that helps sexism fade over time.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
The troll comment is just name calling so I'll just chalk it up to a personal dislike of Jen but self-important infers he saw or heard something that I did not. The only "controversial" statement from Jen all season is that she has made lots of boys cry in her kitchen which I think was a very big deal but I haven't been upset by much of any of what the cheftestants have had to say, including Mike I.
The only action, besides cooking well, that has differentiated Jen from the others is her acting as EC in the last challenge. BTW, I thought this was excellent strategy on the part of Mike I., but it also took a little sacrifice on Jen's part. As EC she must have known she wouldn't have a dish to present so there was no chance of winning the challenge. How this can be interpreted as "self-important' I don't know.
-
re: KTinNYC
well, if no one dish truly shone, but they were all pretty good she could have won conceivably for that role. it was an important one. but i agree unlikely.
but also (while i would never call her a troll or anything) have to admit she rubs me the wrong way. it's an arrogance thing. all the arrogant chef's have done it. marcel, ilan, stephen. except hung for some reason. i must excuse asians (and i'm not). actually it was the smurf village. :) i'd just like to see her loosen up. i get it's an importatnt competition and all but i don't know....
-
re: AMFM
See, I don't get "arrogance" with her at all. I sense self-confidence. HOWEVER, maybe what you are interpreting as arrogance is what someone had mentioned earlier - she seems extremely shy whenever she is out of her element, the kitchen.
I truly enjoy watching her and sort of seeing the wheels turning in her head as she's thinking up things to prepare. Don't get that from a lot of the other chefs.
I'm really enjoying the calibre of talent this year. Mike I's comments... meh. I could really do without. Put up or shut up is what I say. So far, his average is not so good.
-
re: AMFM
There is *no* way Tom "this is a cooking competition" Collichio would let someone win a challenge without cooking. I'd fall off my seat if that ever happened.
The "arrogance" of the good chefs have never really bothered me. Ilan was a crap chef that was able to slide through on the back of his boss' recipes.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: chicgail
I think she was very impressive as in very competent as EC. An inept person can have power but a competent person may not. If she had the ability to dictate to others that she was going to be the EC, then she has power. In this case, she simply accepted a position that Michael suggest she take on since she was not in danger of being eliminated. I do agree that she knew what she was doing and wasn't afraid to make things happen, especially when she mapped out who got to use the big cooking pot (or whatever it was) and when. I admire Jen because she's good at her job but I'm not enthralled by her personality up to this point. Bryan, on the other hand, is just not showing any personality. I think he read the Miranda Warning and decided to let his cooking do the talking (btw, he's pretty calm in his own kitchen so I suspect that's just the way he is, even if he may seem really boring).
-
-
-
-
-
I thought Jen really separated herself from the rest of the pack with the way she led the group last evening. Along with her clear cooking ability. Mike I. reminds me of a 7th grader. really obnoxious. As bad as that pasta salad was, I was REALLY hoping he would get the axe for his tasteless salad with the undercooked shrimp.
›5 Replies-
-
re: ChefJune
I thought Jen really separated herself from the rest of the pack with the way she led the group last evening.
***
How so? She was good in that role but that doesn't mean no one else is. I've seen Bryan V stand in his kitchen while his crew cranked out 21 courses for us (and food for other diners) without anyone having to raise his/her voice. In as much as Mike's sexism is annoying, the clear bias of posters (based on sex) here is just as annoying.-
-
-
re: Ericandblueboy
I don't think you can compare someone working in his own kitchen with his own kitchen crew with someone working in a completely unfamiliar kitchen with a bunch of people she's competing against -- it's a completely different situation.
I think it was impressive because we've seen Top Chef contestants -- even ones who run their own kitchens "back home" -- do badly in similar situations, restaurant wars being the prime example.
-
-
-
-
i liked this episode as well. thought surprising amount of the food looked good despite the limitations. doesn't someone go home every year for making a pasta salad that looks like it got thrown together for a neighborhood picnic? i mean really.
oh and i appreciated jen c.'s comment that she wouldn't be nearly as nice as ashley if preeti had dumped her water. :) i kind of like ashley.
-
Enjoy this episode very much.
Really, REALLY impressed with Jenn's executive skills. That's something that is not really seen on the show except perhaps in the restaurant wars. Clearly she can cook. She seems like a different person when she is in the kitchen vs. an interview out side of it. Voice face, mannerisms are all noticeably different.
I've like Kevin from episode one. Now his fellow Atlantan Eli is impressing me as well. They seemed to work really well together and look like they are having fun doing it. Perhaps it's the 'fat kid complex' thing. to which I can relate.
›2 Replies -
Do you remember when you were a kid and boys would run around pulling on little girl's pigtails, give them frogs to gross them out etc? That is their attempt at imprssing the opposite sex. Mike I is hiot for Jenn C. the problem is that he is exhibiting the maturity of a pre-pubescent too.
-
My theory is that Michael actually has something going with Jen C, possibly a love child.
›8 Replies-
-
-
re: dmjordan
I don't buy that. I didn't buy it when jerky little boys pulled my hair in the second grade and I don't get it now.
I think the dude is just plain insecure, jealous and scared of Jen beating the figurative pants off him and fighting back with the limited arrows in his quiver (double-entendre intended).
-
-
Yikes - just saw the preview for next week - whoever wins the QF gets immunity, but whoever loses goes home! There's a "holy shit!" moment, as Bryan V. said!
›5 Replies-
re: LindaWhit
It must be tough in the women's bedrooms right now - 3 have gone home, and if I had to lay money on roulette'-ish Man/Woman elimination next week, I'd say its more likely a woman that goes home. But its nice that Jen seems like she can be a contender, and perhaps Ashley.
Its clear that the men have some weak players, who just haven't been "the worst" on any particular night, and haven't been in the "Bad Dish" limelight enough to lose them the benefit of a doubt, but from a political standpoint, I sort of hope one of them goes before Jesse or Laurine (or Jesse gets her act together - she has good ideas but always one mortal mistake that screws her)...
-
re: grant.cook
I'm thinking Ron as being kind of teetering and Ash, who's failed ice cream turned into a decent custard. I don't mind either one but neither exudes that alpha male thing that the brothers have going for them.
I like Kevin and Eli's chances because it seems they have the chops. Hector has pulled off a few surprises too. Don't know about the French guy because I can understand him.
In all, not a weak bunch at all, it will be tough to eliminate the guys.
-
re: grant.cook
Agree on Jessie - she overseasons with cayenne, she messes up somehow.
Peel's comment to her last night was priceless....takes a spoonful of the soup, swallows, :::::long pause::::: and then says in a slightly strangulated voice "You like cayenne." A statement....not a question. :-)
Robin seems to be pretty strong, although we haven't seen much from her. Otherwise, it does seem like Jennifer (and maybe Ashley) are the strongest women.
As for men who could go - I'm thinking the Haitian Ron Duprat is a goner in the next few. They kind of lumped Ron and Jessie together last night by default - neither seemed to want to be with the other as a team. Hector has stepped up to the plate, but Mattin has been pretty nonexistent. Next week, with Joel Robuchon as the judge, he'd better hit it out of the park!
And then there's Mike Isabella. :-/
-
re: LindaWhit
The chef's who cook with more of a South American style - Hector, Ron - its always a crapshoot. The two ethnicities that seem to always play well are "French" and "Italian" with perhaps Asian / Asian Fusion working well also. You just never know when their techniques and master recipes they rely on will fall flat against the judges pallettes. I am thinking about a the deep fried steak as an example...
-
-
-
-
-
Went to the BravoTV website and they have this up (15min before the end of the show):
Preeti Served: The judges just weren't feelin' the pasta salad she and her partner Laurine prepared. (Watch).....
Oops!
›5 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: Reignking
I don't think that's ever mattered. As here on CH or any website, if you don't want to know the outcome, you don't go to that website (or open a particular post) until after you've seen it.
The blogs for the last season or two have always gone up right after the show ended on the East Coast. Except, of course, when they run long and the website managers goof, as they did last night. :-)
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Reignking
But a PASTA SALAD? I know they were limited in what to work with, but come on...hasn't that sent people home in past seasons? It's not really hard - and when Mark Peel is saying the ingredients don't work together, that's something.
I have a feeling it's Preeti or Laurene out of there - leaning towards Preeti, because of what Tom was saying - the fact that she doesn't understand why she's there.
-
-
re: Phaedrus
That's pushing it, Phaedrus. <vbg> I'm thinking an aspic wouldn't have gone over well with the military crowd (or any crowd, for that matter!)
If they had canned fruit cocktail, perhaps this would have been the result:
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
We were wondering if you HAD to make a pasta salad, what they could have done to make it a winner.. I mean, I love pasta salad.. but I don't exactly crave it the way I did those pork dishes that were served.
Perhaps if they'd made their own pasta (I hope the kichen had flour, but they'd have to roll it out by hand I suspect) - maybe a tortellini with some really cool filling..
-
-
re: Reignking
Nobody had to make a salad.. they had their chef's hat on there, not their competitor's hats. Everyone could have done protein, for all the competition cared. By the same logic, someone should have made dinner rolls to round out the meal.
There are military types - from an audience perspective, I would guess the prevalence of vegetarians is less than the population as a whole (although anyone in the Air Force here feel free to correct me - do you have seitan MRE's?). But they could have done a dessert, or a pasta-based dish...
-
re: grant.cook
It appeared they also had their families with them. At least, I saw kids who were definitely too young to be in the military! Although the percentage of vegetarians is probably less than the general population, the military has to take into account a wide range of dietary preferences. Vegetarian food will usually satisfy most religious diets, for example.
Although the pasta salad was uninspired, I'm surprised the judges said the ingredients didn't work together: they sounded like pretty typical pasta salad ingredients to me (which is why they were uninspired).
-
-
-
-
-
ok, i WANT those bacon tacos, the bread pudding, and the braised pork & potato salad!
and someone had better go home for that vegetable pasta salad. pedestrian, uninspired, and just plain LAME. dishes like that are what gave vegetarian cuisine a bad name in the first place.
›19 Replies-
-
re: LindaWhit
OK, just read Richard Blais' blog at Bravo - he noted something interesting about Michael Isabella recommending that Jennifer C. take the role of "tournant" (I couldn't remember the word he used further upthread). Blais says:
"So, I found it strange, that in tonight’s episode, Mike Isabella suggests that Jennifer Carroll take on the role of “tournant.”
It’s an interesting approach and reveals a lot about Mike’s character. We now are getting to know the cast a little better, and this play is vintage Isabella. Let’s ask the “girl cook” to take on an archaic title that can best be described as a substitute teacher. Classically, it refers to a cook who works all the stations in other cooks’ absence. A position of skill, sure, but not really of certified rank. A position that may be the proverbial glass ceiling for a woman in Mr. Isabella’s mind.
I said cook, earlier, intentionally. Because I get the feeling, that Mike would have a hard time answering, “Yes, Chef!” to any woman.
Jennifer’s response? Sure, I’ll be the Executive Chef. Touché! "
So Blais is seeing exactly what we've all been saying - that Mike I. has a problem with women leading in the kitchen. It will remain an interesting POV to see how it gets handled in future episodes.
I wonder if there's an episode where the two of them have to work directly together?
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
The great thing about an album or a menu is that you can skip over the items you don't like and still dig the artist. Blais does not use nitrogen "every time he cooks" any more than Hendrix used a wah wah peddle on every track.
Irrespective of whether or not some may dislike those elements they helped propel the artist to popularity because the elements they incorporated into their art are unique.
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I'm going to play devils advocate on this one.
I'm not a fan of Mike, but I do think there was some valid reasoning behind 'his' (assuming it was) idea. They had no idea what the challenge was going to be; Why not work in teams? There was and odd number of people. Jenn did have immunity. I did think it made sense to have her in a position where she would not be competing against others who are trying to remain in the competition. And Jenn could have refused the position and made something on her own.
-
re: Withnail42
Oh, I don't disagree at ALL on having Jennifer be the EC for the Elimination Challenge - it makes complete sense, especially when they decided on their own to form teams.
My posting the comments from Blais's blog was in reference to Mike Isabella's previous and current rather demeaning comments about Jennifer C. and women in general. Blais's comments were along the same lines as what several people on CH threads have said - saying "that's one less old lady I have to deal with", calling Jennifer a tournant (lower level than EC), etc. He seems to have a HUGE chip on his shoulder about women running a kitchen, and Blais called him out about it in his blog.
-
re: LindaWhit
I certainly agree that Mike seems to have an issue with women. I think he is probably simply arrogant/insecure over all. And I believe he would have taken the same attitude and degraded the position regardless of who, male or female, was filling it in order to attempt to deal with his own insecurities. It is just more noticeable when it is a woman given his history.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ok so last week Ashley makes a big deal about cooking for an event that she cannot participate and someone on the board made a comment asking how the gay chefs would feel if they had to cook for the military because of the "don't ask don't tell" policy....well lo and behold! Doesn't Ashley go ahead and say what an honor it is for her to cook for the Air Force etc...
Now I am glad that she's excited to cook for them, but isn't it kind of ironic? Discuss...›5 Replies -
i like Mark Peel, it's nice to see him back...and i'm sure he's happy to be on the other side this time :)
i'm so sick of Mike I. he's such an ass. i don't care if he "means" to be or not, it's just obnoxious and juvenile. and considering that his last 2 dishes (this QF & last week's EC) have fallen flat, he needs to just shut up & cook.
somehow i'm not surprised that Ashley did well despite the water fiasco...i think she's the dark horse here. and Ash was clever to re-name his dish so that he could pass it off as a success instead of admitting it didn't turn out. very smart, especially considering the flavors were obviously on point.
Preeti just doesn't impress me. sure, the colors in her QF dish were beautiful, but how did it TASTE?
and i'm really starting to hope Jessie goes home tonight. she just can't get it together. every challenge she falls short on execution.
›16 Replies-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I have mixed feelings about Jen. I think she is extemely talented, but something seems off to me. Can pinpoint it yet though. The preview where she made the comment to the chefs about keeping it about the food and discussing "this" later, made it seem like she was having a disagreement with someone. I thought, hmm good for her not putting up with crap and keeping the focus of the task at hand. Yet it ended up being about a conversation they were having while working. After I saw that, I thought, hmmm that's just being petty. I'm sure the elves edited a bunch of stuff out, but I didn't see the big deal about talking while working. Although I know some chefs like to keep the kitchen all about the current work, or even quiet at times,it didn't make sense to me since things looked like they were running smoothly.
-
-
-
-
re: attran99
Right...I have no wish to see any of the chefs judged on "personality" but I wasn't criticizing their talents, just pointing out how their on camera actions/appearances alter our feelings towards them as people.
I would be curious to know how they appear without the editing. For instance, Bryan didn't even smile when his brother won. Or did he -- and it was just edited out?
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Yes, but sexist Mike did not suggest that she be the Executive Chef. He suggested she be the "tournant" - to quote Richard Blais "It’s an interesting approach and reveals a lot about Mike’s character. We now are getting to know the cast a little better, and this play is vintage Isabella. Let’s ask the “girl cook” to take on an archaic title that can best be described as a substitute teacher. Classically, it refers to a cook who works all the stations in other cooks’ absence. A position of skill, sure, but not really of certified rank. A position that may be the proverbial glass ceiling for a woman in Mr. Isabella’s mind." And she replied to his challenge - sure I'll be the Executive Chef.
-
-
-
Don't forget to add that Mike Isabella makes another totally inappropriate sexist comment! I'm not likely to patronize Zaytinya in DC based on him alone.
›50 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
She did outcook him twice, and I prefer her to him, however she also made ceviche twice, and did another cold preparation using smoked salmon once. I was happy to see her cook during the elimination challenge, as her resume is quite immpressive.
As far as the 'favoritism' comment, do you think it was made due to the fact that Eric Ripert is often a guest chef on Top Chef? While I respect her ability, did a spritz of lime juice and some fresh herb garner a victory worth 15K on a reality show where we are led to believe the focus is on cooking?
-
re: LarryLg
1) Eric Ripert was not the guest judge on this episode.
2) Sexist Mike has never made a comment when a man has won a challenge
3) If the "spritz of lime juice and fresh herb" tasted better than all of the other dishes, then of course she deserves to win. Since you can't taste the food, you'll just have to trust the judges.I figured someone would eventually come in and defend his quite frankly inexcusable comments.
-
-
re: thew
While I'm sure the editors are being selective, the fact that he's given them this much ammunition to work with (in only 3 episodes!) is pretty reflective of his sexism.
I'm honestly sorry if you don't see it - this is the type of nonsense that women have to put up with every day in male-dominated industries.
-
re: thew
"we do not know what mike has or has not said "
Of course we do. The editiors are not changing his words or creating false statments. We just don't know if it's in context or not. It might be reasonable to assume creative editing if it's a one time event but when it occurs on every episide the benifit of doubt begins to diminish IMO.
While I think Mike was a bit off base with his favoritism comment I also think that since Ripert has often been a judge that every one is probably wondering if Jenn doesn't have a slight edge with the judges.
To be fair she really hasn't cooked much at this juncture and that is a complaint we have heard from the judges in the past.-
re: Fritter
let me rephrase for clarity -
reiflame said "2) Sexist Mike has never made a comment when a man has won a challenge"
i said we have no idea if he did or didn't make a comment when a man has won. I did not mean to imply he didn't say what he said, only that our not seeing him say something is not the same as his not saying. he may well have bitched and moaned after every loss, and the editors only shows the ones after women won to build that drama.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LarryLg
It's hardly novel. Heck, a Top Chef contestant has whipped one out before:
http://www.buddytv.com/articles/top-c...
To similar dismissal, I might add.
-
-
-
-
re: charmedgirl
no, no...technically it *is* a cooking style applied to rice. so you did know :)
Mike's comment had to do with the fact that he apparently thinks all home cooks have the inaccurate impression that risotto is a *variety* of rice (like arborio or basmati) as opposed to a particular preparation of it. ironically, his explanation wasn't completely accurate because he didn't specify that true risotto is only made with rice. his potato dish may have been cooked "in the style of risotto," but it sure as hell wasn't risotto!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: wincountrygirl
I actually LIKED the judging this time - they showed them really having expressing their feelings...when something sucked, they said it. Perhaps it's just that the show was longer and we saw *more* of the judging. I almost wish this show could always be 75 minutes. I just think you get more out of what we want to really see - the cooking *and* the judging and the reasons behind why the judges make the decisions they do.
-
re: reiflame
And "risotto" a technique that has nothing to do with rice? Obviously, the technique used to make risotto can be applied to other foods, but if I ordered risotto (derived from the Italian "riso") in a restaurant I'd expect to get a rice dish unless specifically told otherwise. FWIW, here's Wikipedia:
"There are many different risotto recipes with different ingredients, but they are all based on rice of an appropriate variety cooked in a standard procedure.
-
re: jbw
i can't believe i'm gonna defend Mike here, but he didn't say it has "nothing to do with rice." what i got from it was that he assumed all of us poor, misinformed, clueless home cooks (cough, cough) think risotto is a *variety* of rice, and he felt it was his duty to inform us that it's a technique.
-
-
-
re: dmjordan
language evolves, and things that aid communication will survive. so if saying "potato risotto" gets the idea across more simply or clearly than "potatoes cut small to simulate rice, and then cooked in the same manner as a risotto, so as to achieve a similar result" we will continue to hear it - and i'm ok with that.
as i've said a million times before - unless you still use "terrific" to mean "terror inducing" and refuse to call it a "sunset" because the earth moves, you are w/out a leg to stand on, consistency-wise on this issue.
-
-
-
re: Buckethead
oh i didn't say he was right :)
if we're going to get particular about semantics, perhaps i should have said "preparation." the fact is that risotto is a rice dish cooked a specific way (which is why i said technique), and what i got from his comment was that he believes people are under the erroneous impression that risotto is a variety of rice (like basmati, or long-grain, or arborio...).
anyway, i think it's funny that he went out of his way to school us all with his little aside, when he could have used a little schooling himself - his potatoes were "cooked in the style of risotto," which would have been the proper way for him to describe his dish.
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
I was scratching my head at what he said when he said it wasn't the rice (dish?) that home cooks think it is. I was wondering if I'd been wrong on what it is and that anything cooked in that technique was "risotto." I've cooked oatmeal, baby pastini, orzo like that but would have never called any of it "risotto." Thanks for explaining. Scary you're reading his mind, though!
How much liquid do potatoes absorb? I wonder how it compares to rice.
-
-
-



























