Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Food Media & News >
Apr 1, 2009 03:54 AM

NY Times on cancellation of Chopping Block

I have to disagree with the analysis, which seems to blame it primarily on Marcus Pierre White for not being Gordon Ramsay. I think it was a complete lack of interesting contestants.

However my 12 year old son just came down and saw the article and said it was "because he didn't get angry enough"; that "Top Chef is for people who like cooking and Hell's Kitchen is for people who like watching people get shouted at. This was neither".

"Chopping Block" Winds Up There

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. I disagree with the Times. MP White should have been a goldmine for the director. I blame cheap production, bad direction, poor scripting and editing.

    No one made the show sing.

    It was cheap, it looked it... next.

    3 Replies
    1. re: TrishUntrapped

      I haven't read the article yet, but the show was really slow and boring. None of the contestants seemed to have any great talent and frankly they were all a bit annoying. There was no one that I was rooting for in any way. There was little cooking shown, mostly talking, mostly shots of MPW sitting in a chair talking to the camera about what they all need to do to succeed on the was a snoozefest! And I also have to say that the first "critic" and Steingarten on the second show both came off as buffoons. And I generally like Steingarten on ICA. Oh well, another one bites the dust!

      1. re: TrishUntrapped

        I agree. The show could have been interesting, but as a viewer, it was a real opportunity lost. Still, it's hard to tell if it was the casting, the production or the scripting and editing that blew it.

        The contestants could have been anyone. Could any of them actually cook? Did any of them have any real restaurant experience? I had no idea what experience or talents any of them brought to the show. It wasn't until the last show that I realized they were paired by front-of-the-house and back-of-the house.

        There was no one to identify with or root for and no real villains so the show had no drama.

        And frankly, the show was a total copycat attempt at Last Restaurant Standing, Gordon Ramsay's -- anything, and Top Chef (sorta), but it never established itself as anything.

        1. re: TrishUntrapped

          Agree with the cheapness of the show; poor direction, scripting and editing. And there was no one who was remotely interesting as a contestant. NBC screwed this one up themselves.

          Although I will give them this: “ Mr. Ramsay is the bollocking king. " That he is. :-)

          I *do* disagree with this statement about TC: "But “Top Chef” is on Bravo, a cable network that is also home to “Project Runway” and caters to a narrow but devoted demographic with highfalutin tastes and insider knowledge."

          Highfalutin tastes? Making a breakfast? Making an amuse bouche? That's highfalutin? Wow. Poor Alessandra needs to get out more.

        2. My TV guide (on Yahoo) says Chopping Block is still on tonight.

          1. Good riddance. The show was awful.

            1. Does then say something about the viewing audience? There is no room for growing older and maturing beyond the need of profanity? That as an audience, we only want violent, profanity ridden shows airing the waves. I like watching HK but I tire of the berating GR puts on the contestants. That show is prime for yelling simply because the producers take contestants that have absolutely no excuse for being their in the first place.

              I was having issues with the CB show, but really because ejecting one pair even though one person may have been the issue. This show has more in common with "Last Restaurant Standing", then HK, TC or IC/A.

              Marco obviously has culinary talent and for whatever reason that experience was limited to the viewers.

              1. Haven't read the article yet either, but I have to say I did not like MPW. I thought he was boring and melodramatic. What's worse, I thought his commentary lacked insight and, more often than not, added nothing to the show. I mean, I know he's a phenomenal chef, but it did not come through at all, in my opinion. Finally, I said it in another thread, but I'll repeat it here, MAN it bugged me the way he pointed at the camera, punctuating almost every (point) single (point) word (point) he said. Got very old, very quick.

                1 Reply
                1. re: charmedgirl

                  Could not agree more. His solemn pontificating with all the finger pointing really turned me off as well. If they put him in handcuffs he'd be unable to speak.

                  I did not much care for any of the contestants (with the exception of the perceptive couple who voluntarily walked off the show in the first episode). But in my book the major failure was MPW himself. He would be better off returning to the kitchen.