-
So...what happened to Tom's super-delicate stomach? I thought he couldn't handle even the slightest spice? Regardless, is someone with this handicap really in a position to judge Cajun cooking?
Regarding Jeff, I was incredibly disappointed that he won instead of Jamie. That said, Emeril seemed really impressed with Jeff's cooking. Tom was a big Jeff booster, too. So obviously Mr. Dildo is doing something right...
I don't think Carla will win, but I'm so incredibly psyched that she won that challenge. She is so totally my vote for fan favorite. I can't wait for the Carla cooking show...
›9 Replies-
re: a_and_w
I don't know why everyone is so hot on Jamie -- she really wasn't all that, IMHO. She did well in some challenges, but she also ended up in the bottom several times, in both quickfires and elimination challenges. I don't remember any time I was really impressed with her; I think she was a lot more impressed with herself than anyone else was. Actually, I think in a quieter way she was just as cocky and attitudinal as Stefan, without the chops to back it up.
Oh wait. I thought she did a good job running the kitchen during restaurant wars, when Radhika completely washed her hands of all responsibility. But still, I thought generally she was mediocre.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I was never thrilled with Jamies food either...funny because she said a few times about other chefs having "wierd" flavor combo's - but I thought some of her dishes sounded a bit wierd!
I found her whole "FINALLY I won a challenge" bit really annoying and I know I got allot of slack about this - but the more I watch the "Le Bernadine" episode the more of a brat (to me) she sounds like when she say's "to be honest I"m BORED with this kind of food"
she has a real arrogant tone in her voice when she says it...
I was thrilled that Jeff won that QF!-
re: NellyNel
Yes, and I've heard from people who know Jamie that it isn't the editing -- she's apparently snarky like that in real life. I guess I really like her style of cooking -- simple and driven by what's available locally and seasonally. Plus, I really admired her guts coming back with that second scallop dish. If you look at her track record on the show (available on wiki) she was as good as anyone in the competition -- and she would have looked even better if she'd gotten one or two of those wins that I'm not sure Ariane deserved. Jamie and Stefan both annoyed me at first, and each had their flaws, but I felt like both demonstrated some real skills. Neither was truly outstanding like, say, Hung. But I felt like both were the cream of a strong but weaker crop than past years.
This may be unfair, but I couldn't help thinking Jeff got some accolades because he's good looking and charismatic. I would be curious to see more blind tastings on the show -- I felt like he and Leah benefited from their good looks. Most importantly, I just never warmed to his style of cooking, which by his own admission, was consistently overthought.
-
re: a_and_w
At the end of the day, editing can only do so much. You've never heard a snarky or arrogant thing out of Carla and the most likely reason is that she doesn't say things like that. You can't put attitude or words into someone's mouth to influence a perception; you can only choose to include or exclude certain things. Just looking at Carla at one JT when she was clearly screwed by her teammates (I don't remember the episode), and you can see the genuinely nice person who would never throw someone under the bus. IMO Leah came off snarky and Sefan came off arrogant, though I am sure both of them had kind, caring moments. You cannot manufacture a personality trait but you can choose to highlight it.
-
re: a_and_w
I wouldn't say she did as well as anyone -- she was high and low about as much as the other top contenders in elimination challenges, but was the only one of the top nine who never won a quickfire.
As for her cooking style, maybe I've lived in the Bay Area for too long. "Driven by local/seasonal" is pretty much what everyone does. If you want to be outstanding, you have to do more than that. When a chef says that in a tone that suggests there's something unique about their approach, I want to gag. It's a great approach, I support it, but don't make it sound like it makes you special, because really, it just makes you one of many following the current trend.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that anyone -- including home cooks like me shopping at their local farmers market and especially if like Jamie you live in the Bay Area -- can cook local/seasonally driven food; I'm more interested in what you do with it.
-
-
-
-
-
Did anyone notice that Carla got the best prizes this season? Super Bowl tickets AND a car! Can't complain about that.
I can't wait to see if Stefan is actually going cook to his potential as opposed to working on cruise control. And if he makes another panna cotta....
›5 Replies-
-
re: roxlet
Yeah, but I bet that won her big points. The cheftestants are away from their families for a long time -- over a month -- it would be really nice to come back with a reward for their patience/sacrifices/support. Carla being the kind of person she is, I bet she was more happy to have a prize she could give her husband and stepson (did you see the pictures of him on her site? he looks just like her, it's amazing they're not related!) than she would have been to have a prize for herself.
That said, the Le Bernadin prize was a great prize for the kind of chef who would have really appreciated it (not Jamie!).
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Carla talked about the fate of her Super Bowl tickets on the Burning Questions blog last month: http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/blogs...
The actual quote is:
Bravotv.com: Are you going to the Super Bowl this weekend? Or did you give the tickets to the men in your life?
Carla: I am going to send the men in my life. The joy was watching Matthew's face once he realized HE was going to the Super Bowl. Priceless!!! Noah is OVER THE MOON!
-
-
-
-
All I gotta say is that Carla (Karla?) cooked the best-looking food since Season 1. I had to mop up the drool. Jeff's food was almost as good-looking, but the judges were absolutely right this time. Except I would have booted Stefan, who just mailed it in. Fabio may have screwed up, but he came up with pretty good food.
›23 Replies-
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
agreed. when she started to critique herself at judges table and he said "there was NOTHING wrong with that dish". i'm not sure i've ever heard him say that. it's their job to pick things apart.
it's funny a foodie on another board has totally been slamming her as "equivalent to a NJ hausfrau" who can only make simple southern food and it kills me. it's not that she had no bad days - she did. and i bet she HAS been helped by the number of catering challenges. but her food has seriously impressed wylie dufresne(only a little simple), scot conant(not simple), dan barber (pastry), emeril, eric ripert(not simple), and jaques pepin. what more of a recommendation do you need really? :)-
-
re: LindaWhit
It's sort of the way Bravo has chosen to portray her, though: the flaky caterer. I had no idea that she had the kind of training and experience she has until I read her bio, and if someone is claiming that, they haven't read her bio, either. It's pretty clear that they've deliberately set her up as an underdog by downplaying her qualifications as much as possible, especially early on.
-
re: LindaWhit
I've decided that the people insisting that Carla's simply gotten lucky and can only do simple, and doesn't put much thought into her dishes either aren't paying attention or are blinded by dislike of her personality. Of her highest showing, two (the squab and the first dessert) were simple but perfectly executed, something that can earn a win (cf. Ariane). The rest, from the oatmeal QF to this week's EC, were not. Also, only a minority of what she's cooked can be classed as southern (she's spoken with some frequency about her southern origins and fondness for the food, though).
If Carla has benefited from the number of catering challenges, then probably so has Stefan (also a caterer).
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I'm aware of that. AMFM said above, "and i bet she HAS been helped by the number of catering challenges." My point was that there is another caterer who has made it to the finals, and if her experience with what works in catering settings helped her get there, then perhaps his did, too (I'm not contending that this was a deciding factor in either case). That obviously wasn't clear.
On the flip side, though over the seasons many restaurant-based contestants have derided the caterers, they've been bitten in the ass by not understanding what works in catering challenges (e.g., which preparations hold up to storage and transportation, cooking ahead, etc.).
-
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
It depends on how you define "classically trained." Carla went to cooking school, where she was trained in classical French techniques; Stefan was trained by the classical apprenticeship methods of working in restaurants since his teens, presumably being given on the job training in traditional European cooking techniques.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
thanks, Ruth - i should have clarified that. different situations since they were trained on different continents :)
if anyone's interested, you can see the details of Stefan's training in his bio on his company's website. just click "about us" on the left, and then "the chef" at the top of the page...
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
Stefan has rubbed me wrong from the very first smirk. I certainly don't hate him and I'm sure he does his repertoire nicely. I just don't think he's the kind of person I want to win this show. But then again, I've really only been wholly on board with Harold and, somewhat begrudgingly, Stephanie. I don't likes me the arrogance in my reality show contestants.
Stefan's worst sin by far, though, is that OBNOXIOUS music on his Web site. :)
His resume is quite admirable -- the result of the best Europe has to offer in training people for the real world. Their respect of trades like cooking, ironwork, and the other metiers that makes this world go 'round is one of the things I love most about their attitude.
However, he also represents a smug superiority that I simply can't get over. And I recently discovered that a friend of mine knows one of the key people involved in casting the show -- and he says Stefan's edits are not deceptive at all. He can be nice and supportive, but according to this dude, he's also a pompous terd.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
<It depends on how you define "classically trained." Carla went to cooking school, where she was trained in classical French techniques; Stefan was trained by the classical apprenticeship methods of working in restaurants since his teens, presumably being given on the job training in traditional European cooking techniques.>
Both methods qualify as "classically trained." fwiw.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: AMFM
oh and i must confess that i just reread the post i was talking about and he compared her to "THE NJ hausfrau" not "a" - i'm guessing saying she was on level with ariane not with jamie, jeff, stefan, etc. still frankly a bit insulting to them both but maybe less insulting to NJ and to hausfraus in general so i thought when i caught it i'd explain.
i still disagree.-
re: AMFM
Even if he was comparing her to Ariane, Ariane is a CIA grad who runs her own reportedly successful restaurant with her husband, who is a pastry chef. I don't see how that makes her less qualified than Jamie! What that attitude is, actually, is a reflection on the fact that our culture doesn't take mature women seriously, especially if they're married. Jamie is a single twenty-something who lives in a big city, and thus is seen as "serious" about her career, while a woman who is married and lives outside a city is automatically dismissed as a dilettante who is running a business (probably financed by her husband) as a "hobby." And of course whether a man is married or not doesn't reflect at all on how serious he is about his career!
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Ruth, very astute. Once women hit that magic 40-ish number, they disappear to much of the world. This is true for all women, regardless of accomplishment. You can cling to "noticeability" for a little longer if you remain trim and attractive, but eventually you become a "non-person." I remember my Mom telling me this, and of course, I thought she was imagining it. Twenty years later, I am living it. Thank goodness I don't get my self-value from strangers.
-
re: smtucker
<This is true for all women, regardless of accomplishment.> except for Julia Child, of course, who didn't appear on tv the first time until she was past 50.
Ariane and Michael Duarte are both CIA grads, and Culinariane is a very successful restaurant in Montclair. Just try to get a reservation! Even before she was on Top Chef, it was a difficult reservation to get. The food is fabulous.
And now they are looking to enlarge. Even in this economic climate.
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
i hate to defend him. i hated the comment. but i still misinterpreted it. i think both yours and smtucker's comments are right on. but i think HE (not me) was saying that in his opinion their food was not to the level of the other contestants because of it's simplicity. personally i think it needs to TASTE good but if you are an only grant achatz can be top chef kind of person...
the thing that frustrated me was twofold: one, i just think he's wrong about the simplicity of carla's food. and two, it's not like any of these other chefs are showing themselves to be grant achatz!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I never get to watch the show on Wed. nights, so I'm always late on the board, but here are my thoughts :
I was a bit annoyed that they bought out the eliminated chefs for the QF. I was really looking forward to seeing the top four go at it. I think the top 4 are the chefs that should have been highlighted. IMO
I was REALLY glad though that Jeff did win the QF ...I'm so done with Leah and Jamie...
At that point though I was still rooting for Stefan to win the EC, but as the episode went on, I really was surprised at his frivolous attitude...but then again it could have been edited to make it seem like he was a bit more lax then he really was.
But what I was really surprised at - was that he only made TWO things - and neither of them were spot on.
I am sure Carla deserved the win, but not so sure if Fabio deserved to go home.I have read through all these posts and no one has mentioned the preveiw clip we saw of Hosea seemingly doing something to screw Stefan - and then showing Hosea saying gleefuly :"Screw Youn Stefan!" and giving the double middle fingers!! WHOA!!
I believe in karma - and if he has done something not entirely nice - I think it will only bite him in the ass!! And I hope it does!!
›26 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
You have no idea how hard it is to get through Thursdays, pumped about the night before, checking the board for responses and also falling asleep at work! Wednesday night is a night I plan around. I think I need a 12 step program. Linda, ghg, AMFM, wanna join me? After the finale, of course. :)
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
agreed. but the sad thing is i usually replace with whatever other bravo show replaces it. which is fine when it's project runway (if it's on at a different time this time since it's changing networks - aaaahh!) because it's fab too. but there's nothing like the embarrassment of realizing you're sucked into the supermodel show. :) at least i don't want to eat through that one. the biggest problem with top chef is that at 10:40 i'm suddenly ravenous! :)
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
But Project Runway's new season is held up by a P___ing contest between NBC and the production company.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I thought the twist in the QF challenge would be that the winner would be able to pick the cheftestant he/she would work with, until I realized the numbers didn't add up. I think that would have been interesting, rather than the cheftestants picking their helpers.
I'm glad Jeff was back, would have loved to see him win yesterday and thought he was very gracious and seemed appreciative rather than bitter. I am happy Carla won but, if Jeff winning meant Stefan would have been sent home, I'd rather Jeff had won. I like Fabio but the Team Euro thing was getting old, just like the Team Rainbow thing.
-
Okay, here's Fabio's quote of the week, this time from his exit interview (he's speaking of Stefan): "Sometimes when you're overconfident, you get your ass kicked with your own shoes." Great quote, and very apropos!
›17 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: gastrotect
The Plantation where the Quickfire was filmed is next to the Mississippi River with only a levee and bature in between. In January, the water coming down the river is COLD, it's coming from the snow bound midwestern and central USA.
Any slight breeze puts a windchill on the air that can be really miserable.
There's thermometer cold and then there's what it feels like cold.
-
-
-
-
-
-
i think this season's cast is a really enjoyable to watch (minus the leah and hosea thing) but seriously how cute is it that stefan visited fabio when they were on break- and when fabio left his departing words to stefan. they treat eachother with respect and help eachother out in the kitchen. interested to see what happens in the kitchen between stefan and hosea next week. definitely bummed fabio was sent home!
›1 Reply -
Interesting - survey at Bravo's TC website asks who viewers will think will win. So far, the results are:
Who do you think will win Top Chef?
Carla - 57%
Hosea - 8%
Stefan - 35%›20 Replies-
re: LindaWhit
I am officially a Carla fan because:
1) I can see eating in her restaurant & having her pull a chair up at my table & having her say: "so, what did y'all think?"
2) I can see having her over for dinner & not feeling intimidated by her at all. As a matter of fact, she'd probably help with some of the cooking & probably offer to help with the dishes.
3) She is SO not full of herself; she is gracefully confident, with just enough of a touch of insecurity to make her attentive to detail in ways that the others are not.
4) She came back with a very cool new 'do.
5) She is by far one of the most "normal" people I have ever seen on TC, and I would be honored to have her as a friend. Even if she weren't cooking, she is still be one very cool lady.
6) She never seems to feel compelled to "blow her own horn" or puff herself up.
7) She is FUNNY!!!! Not over-the-top funny, or funny at someone else's expense, she is just funny.
8) She seems to be more mature than most of the others. I'm not talking about her youthful quirkiness, I'm talking about her maturity in the face of pressure, and her ability to approach her work in a mature way. Is that because of her prior life experiences? I don't know, but it's noticable.
9) She seems to focus more on the people who will be eating her food than the others do. She wants them to have a good experience and "feel the love" in her food -- the others seem more focused on making themselves look good, and if the person eating the food doesn't "get it", then it's that person's fault, not theirs.
10) I like the fact that she THINKS about her audience. It was a stroke of genius to do a non-alcoholic drink. All those people in costumes, in a crowd, sampling all kinds of food? You'd better believe I'd want something I could just chug down & quench my thirst with instead of another drink to get me wasted.
And lastly, she is the only cheftestant whose restaurant I would go out of my way to visit. I'd make a special trip. I might watch Fabio on TV, but I'd go SEE Carla and pay to eat her food.
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Totally agree on the editing of Carla. She's more personality and those great facial expressions, less talk of her "spirit guides". I thought she was just going to be a wacko at the beginning, but now I am rooting for her because she really is bringing it now!
And my wife and I are totally doing the "hootie hoo" thing when we're looking for each other..
-
re: LindaWhit
I love Carla's cool in the kitchen, and how she tells it like it is. I love that she's not over-confident at any moment, but confident enough to express in her interviews that she's relied a lot on her french training to get her thru this (appreciating her roots). I like how excited she gets with her successes - she's just a great person, and I agree, I'll definitely eat at her restaurant, and be her best friend if she'll have me.
-
-
re: PattiCakes
You put this very well, PattiCakes, but we're going to have to fight over her as our BFF! I noted that several episodes ago, and my admiration for her ability and temperament has grown week by week.
For all of the posters who claimed that Stefan wasn't as arrogant as he seemed, I wonder what they made of Tom's comments about Stefan's attitude. I think that his sense of entitlement and arrogance were in full bloom in last night's episode, and given Tom's comment, no one can claim that what they were seeing was strictly a function of editing!
-
-
re: roxlet
"For all of the posters who claimed that Stefan wasn't as arrogant as he seemed, I wonder what they made of Tom's comments about Stefan's attitude. I think that his sense of entitlement and arrogance were in full bloom in last night's episode"
I have been defending Stefan allot, but I have NEVER said said wasn't arrogant. He is definitely arrogant, but he is not a bad guy. There is a huge difference.
I find it funny that most people are annoyed by Hosea's obsession with Stefan - but yet are all believing his hype.
When you re-watch the episodes, look for Stefans warm side - and you will see it.
I have read many posts about him being sexist - I have NEVER seen him say anything derogatory about women so where is that coming from???
In fact I loved the bit when the eliminated chefts were doing the QF and Stefan was talking about what a good chef Leah is...it was lovely...and don't forget - he is the one who helped Carla with her oysters.
Arrogant - yes (and in fact WAY TOO arrogant in the last 2 challenges) but he is not a bad guy!!-
re: NellyNel
I was watching for how the greetings outside of the airport went and Stefan and Hosea definitely had a big hug. Not a 'man' hug, but a genuine, happy to see you hug.
I don't doubt that some of Hosea's supposed obsession comes from the producers. I have read interviews with reality show contestants and in the one on one interviews, the producers ask leading questions and ask and ask until they get the desired reaction and their sound bite.
-
-
re: Sooeygun
Right. Viewers should always remember that the sound bites aren't being heard in context -- in addition to the fact that you never hear the question that prompted the remark, sound bites can be moved so that they appear to be in response to something completely unrelated to the situation they were made about, they can be repeated to create the impression that someone is obsessed/harping on something, and they can even be manipulated so that they aren't actually what the person said (not in a direct interview, but in a voice-over comment).
-
-
-
-
re: NellyNel
I've got your back, NellyNel. I like him, Sure he's cocky and he seems to enjoy taking the piss out of people, including himself, it would seem. I don't think that's deeply unpleasant, nor does it suggest 'entitlement'.
If he were nasty, or a bully, I wouldn't defend him. But that's not what I'm seeing in his playful cockiness. As some others have noted, there seems to be a warmth and affection on display. He may not be easy, but no one there hates him-- and we've seen contestants hate each other on this show in the past.
-
re: NellyNel
I can jump in there and defend Stefan too. The general impression from this thread is... Fabio we like, Stefan is overconfident.
I see it exactly the other way around. I interpret "overconfident" as being more confident than the skills you really have. Stefan is confident but, at least from what we can see, he can really cook. Fabio is overconfident, thinking, it would appear, that he can cook much better than he actually can. Maybe it was just the pressures of the competition. Of course his personality, humor, and drive to succeed will take him very far. But aside from some cool olives in the beginning and a perfect roast chicken at the end, his cooking never raised to the level of his repeated claims about it. Maybe he will surprise us in the future. I actually don't think it's a good thing that he might be getting his own show. Our media is saturated with great "tv personalities" who aren't really bringing the cooking chops. Maybe he will be different, we'll see.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Can Carla win it all? I am over Stefan, pretty much the same way I was over Hung, and he still won it all. But Carla has really stepped up to the plate, hasn't she? I think the judges want Stefan to win, though.
›19 Replies-
re: jeanmarieok
I loved the judges' comment that Carla's food was sophisticated and thoughtful. She does seem very calm and focused in the kitchen. I would love to see her win this thing. I thought that the preview of the final with Hosea and Stefan going at each other makes Carla's calm seem even more crucial to success in the final. If she can just stay above the fray...
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
Emeril didn't even start talking, just made an involuntary contradictory noise -- a great moment indeed ;-)
I hadn't noticed that Carla hadn't been drinking with everyone else, but her abstinence probably helps her be an adult in the midst of the chaos. (Well, plus her relative age and general centered personality, of course.)
-
-
re: TampaAurora
As a non-drinker, I was a little annoyed that they added a mandatory cocktail to the competition--I don't think that you have to be a mixologist to be a top chef. I didn't know that Carla didn't drink, and it was so cool that she just seemed to take the challenge of making a cocktail in stride, and turn it to her advantage instead of getting freaked out about it. And I totally agree with her--it's so disappointing to go to a nice food event, and all that there is to drink is soft drinks, which don't go well with food, or water.
-
re: Nettie
Nettie, I'm seriously with you. I thought her decision on the cocktail was an extremely good one.
I'm a drinker, and like nothing better than a good belt at an event like that -- except for those times when I'm the designated driver, and find myself relegated to soda, seltzer or some nasty non-alcoholic beer. I'd love something more interesting.
And since the judges keep telling the cheftestants to put themselves in their food, Carla did exactly that. How in the world could anyone ding her for that?
-
re: dmd_kc
it made me think of an earlier episode, where she'd wanted to make a vegetarian dish and then second-guessed herself. Here, she had more confidence, and the judges wound up appreciating it more than they would have, had she tried to do what she thought that they wanted her to do.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: jeanmarieok
I think it's her game to lose. Maybe that's just because I think she's awesome and I want to be her best friend. But seriously, she's cooked some amazing looking food.
I thought she was toast when she was having problems with the oysters. I was also worried when the judges visited her next to last. I do think that her calm demeanor can come in handy when faced with a stressful situation. A lot of people would have caved under having to serve food to 100 people in formal wear with big appetites (after an oyster problem). Being congenial during a frenzy is a tremendous skill to have.
I also liked her non-alcoholic cocktail. I'm not a non-drinker by any means, but there are times when I don't want or can't have alcohol, but am not thrilled by the idea of water or soda either. I like that she provided an option.
-
re: rweater
In the end, her difficulty with the oysters may have made it a better dish. Gail (I think) commented on how plump and perfect the oysters were and that was probably because they cooked at the very last minute in the stew. If she had steamed them to get them open, they might have ended up over-cooked.
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I just found the recipe for the oyster stew: http://recipes.mt.bravotv.com/top_che...
It calls for poaching the oysters in a fish fumet, then straining the fumet and adding it to the stew, which would be where the stew gets the oyster flavor. But in the show she very clearly was poaching the oysters on-site to order, and wouldn't have been able to add the poaching liquid to the stew then finish cooking it. Plus it sounded like she only had 100 oysters (one for each guest) some of which were not shucked when they went to the event space, so she didn't have other oysters that she used to add to the base...very mysterious.
-
re: Nettie
As is obvious in this case, the recipes they publish on line are not exactly what was prepared on the show. I noticed in the side bar it says you can use clam juice instead of fish fumet -- maybe she used some oyster juice. It's also not clear that she only has 100 oysters -- she said she had to shuck 100 oysters, but that doesn't mean she didn't have other oysters that she prepared differently to make stock from. Since Jeff also used oysters, clearly there were many oysters in the kitchen!
The fact that she said she only shucked oysters for the first time a week and a half prior makes me think this was a dish she had developed in advance for use in the finale. They knew they were going to New Orleans, and from past shows they knew there was a strong probability they would be asked to cook "New Orleans" dishes for at least one challenge. Besides, this dish was too complex to have been perfected "on the fly." I think what threw her was that she was having to shuck oysters for 100 instead of just enough for judges' table.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Good points, all. There was a scene where Jeff took out a big box of oysters and mentioned something about "if anyone else wants oysters, there's no way I'm using all of these" and Carla responded that she definitely needed them. Obviously there were plenty of oysters to go around.
I was quite worried about her oyster shucking and whether she'd be able to get them done--I was wishing that she could have brought back Brian Malarkey from season 3 to help her out.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Very nice to see Jeff back... bummed he didn't make it.
Carla won! Wow! She's doing really well. The love is showin in her dishes.Can she win it all with Hosea and Stefan butting heads next week?
Also, where's Lee Anne's blog? Ever since the redesign, her blog has dropped off.
›4 Replies -
Does anyone have the exact wording of how Emeril is the typical Creole chef?
I can think, Tom, of at least ten chefs who are both photogenic and are more authentic NOLA than Emeril.
I like Emeril and some of his cookbooks, but a Portuguese from New England is neither Cajun nor Creole.›23 Replies-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I saw no disrespect. The chefs thanked him for dinner, almost all of them said how "honored" they were to cook for him in interviews, and compared notes about the seasonings used in their dinners.
This Emeril is the one I remember from the old Julia Child's TV show. Gracious, soft spoken and a bit shy.
-
-
-
-
re: ChefJune
Everything I have heard indicates the same. However, he's down in Miami for the Food & Wine and MCed a cookoff between two radio personalities this morning. he was surprisingly engaging, with a sarcastic sense of humor. This was a very loose Emeril, digging on the contestants without being mean. Gail was there, too. I think they were both having a blast. I wonder if their appearance together had anything to do with a friendship fostered at the TC final, or if that's a longstanding relationship.
-
-
-
-
re: sugarsnapp
I saw no disrespect toward Emeril at all. I thought the contestants were extremely respectful of Emeril. In fact, I thought it was ironic that Jamie seemed more in awe of Emeril than she was of Eric Ripert and his food. It seemed at every exchange the chefs had with Emeril they accorded him great respect. Jeff even called him "Sir" at one point. And the other judges seemed to look to his opinion on the flavor profiles of the food.
I enjoyed seeing Emeril as a judge. He in turn was very respectful and gracious toward the contestants, and made thoughtful comments (unlike Toby Young in the past -- btw, is he gone for good??). And even though Jeff was eliminated he said he was grateful for Emeril's compliments.
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
There was a short video last year on Wine Spectator where they pitted Emeril, Wolfgang Puck, Mario Batali and Charlie Trotter to create a dish and pair it with a wine of their choice.
Emeril won. I disliked him for some time due to oversaturation and underwhelming restaurants in Miami and Orlando, but he seems a good guy and a heck of a chef.
-
-
re: Sooeygun
I was never an Emeril fan either, but I did get to see his show live at Chelsea Market a few years ago. I was incredibly impressed with the guy. During commercial breaks he engaged the audience and had a low key and very humble demeanor.
At one point he invited all the childen up to grab a treat out of the fridge, and he took the time to speak with every single child, and it was genuine. (The friend I was with had also been to a Martha Stewart taping - and said she was the exact opposite - hiding out of the way during commercial breaks, and never made any attempt and being friendly to the audience)I did not notice any disrespect toward him, but did anyone else think that the chefs were NOT impressed with the food at his restaurant??
-
-
re: pisang goreng
Years ago, long before he'd made it to TV, but after the initial success of Emeril's, he was one of several NOLA chefs who cooked at a fundraiser that the company I worked at put on. He was so incredibly nice, humble, gracious -- absolutely everything and more than you could ask from someone who was already rather famous. Agreed -- that larger-than-life persona is a character. Gotta be.
Unfortunately for me (fool!), I was vegetarian at the time and didn't taste a bite of the stuff he was making that evening. It was a hit with the party-goers, though.
-
re: dmd_kc
had the pleasure of sitting at a table for 8 in the kitchen w/Emeril cooking at a fundraiser 10 yrs ago. I can still taste it:
Truffle Stuffed New Potato w/Truffle Emulsion
Prosciutto Wrapped Gulf Shrimp w/Roasted Garlic Aioli
BBQ Chicken & Andouiile Sausage Strudel w/Onion Marmalade & Green Onion CoulisTruffle Potato Soup W/Crabmeat Timbale, Braised Leeks & Fresh Chervil
Nocello Glazed Duck w/Foie Gras Wild Mushroom Bread Pudding, Spiced Fall Squashes, Watercress & Cider Reduction Sauce
now that's Top Chef!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: shallots
The man may have had a long stint of being obnoxious and his restaurants may not be the cream of the crop anymore, but to pretend that he isn't NOLA or doesn't know Creole is ridiculous. As someone else said, he was the head chef at Commanders! How in the world could he have been that and not know Creole? Or are you implying that he isn't Creole himself? That's true, but also totally irrelevant. Besides all that, he is most well-known for his NOLA days. He came here, fell in love with the city and became famous while here. It's easy to associate him with the city. And his being from Mass. originally is also irrelevant as NOLA is probably more made up of transplants than locals at this point.
-
re: shallots
That's kind of a wow.
He's also big enough to turn his back on the city when it got nailed by Katrine.
Emeril was run over by FoodNetwork and his empire of products and restaurants, a mixed blessing. The truth is he has a good heart and it belongs in New Orleans and the kitchen.
-
-
i thought , in an mostly unexciting season, this was an excellent episode. all the dishes were tight and well made. no one screwed the pooch.
why fabio, over stefan? because the food is more important than the attitude. mostly because, i think, fabio's food wasn't as mardi-gras to the judges.
-
-
re: Evilbanana11
you know - and i am prepped for the slams here - it's just an IDEA :) but i'm wondering if hosea will have a dale season 3 (i think) moment. where he was underperforming and distracted for personal reasons and then got focused and came back and was great in the finals. i mean hosea has annoyed me too but we've always known he had potential. i wouldn't put it past any of them at this point.
i'm always afraid carla's going to choke but i was SO happy she didn't here.-
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
It's becoming harder and harder to watch Hosea because all he does (or all the editors show him doing) is bitch about Stefan. Stefan knows Hosea is threatened by him and purposely gets under his skin. I'm embarrassed for Hosea because his obssession with Stefan makes him look weak and insecure. (I was glad that the judges made it clear at JT that Hosea's gumbo was better than Stefan's though. HA.)
I hope Carla wins, but Gail's interview about the finale on the Bravo blogs gives me the feeling she doesn't. Then again, who knows?
-
re: pisang goreng
I hope Carla wins, but Gail's interview about the finale on the Bravo blogs gives me the feeling she doesn't. Then again, who knows?
~~~~~~~~~~
I just watched one of the bonus clips of Emeril Lagasse at Bravo's site, and he says at the end of "Emeril's Top Chef Experience": "If I could give a little tease, I think the folks at home are going to be very, very surprised with the outcome. Because it's *not* (emphasis Emeril's) who you think. It's not who you think. That's all I can say."So - is he leading us to believe that Stefan does NOT win and it's either Carla or Hosea? Or is he suggesting that it's not Carla?
-
re: LindaWhit
Hard to say...but just about every commetary I've seen (including most opinions expressed here) has felt Stefan is going into the finale the one to beat, despite last week's overcooked salmon (and Stefan certainly seemed to concur!). So, though Emeril came in only at the finale, he may be aware of that perception and is addressing that - or, on the other hand, as you suggest, he could be suggesting the opposite, given we just saw Stefan in the bottom two of the final five.
(Typing "the final five" leads to flight of fancy of cheftestants as cylons...but that's off topic.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Random comments:
One season of Project Runway (the one with Laura Bennett, et al), had a comeback moment well into the season -- they brought back eliminated contestants who had won a challenge, then gave them the same qualifier -- they had to win to stay in. So as soon as they brought back the 3 to give them a chance to be one of the "final five", I guessed they would have to win to go forward.
Great contribution to the JT conversation from both Emeril and Gail. I didn't catch a single bam or kick it up a notch ;-)
Did I see Hubert Keller and Rocco for next week? What about the John Besh rumors? Will he show up?
I hope Jeff can cut short his anticipated decade-long pout with such glowing praise from Emeril and the rest of JT!
-
-
Well, Carla showed them! She can cook and isn't distracted by the boy's pissing contest. The past contestant cook-off was certainly a surprise. I was rooting for Jamie or Jeff. Quite a twist for the sequester house chefs.
Jeff seemed so much older. Not in a bad way. More focused and more aware of what he wants. This maturity should serve him well.
I am sad to see Fabio leave. He is rather entertaining, and I suspect it was a bit of a toss up between Stefan and Fabio. When the blogs go up, we can get Tom's viewpoint. But Fabio just hasn't been delivering up to his potential.
Loved both Padma and Gail's dresses. Classic long black works for me.
Yea Carla!!!!
›12 Replies -
-
-
re: LindaWhit
i've rewound & replayed about 15 times to try to figure it out.
i know, i have a problem :)
it looks like the one on the far right is Blais! and i almost want to say Hung is in the middle. the one on the left is obscured by a plant. i guess it could be Marcel since everyone is talking about him having been spotted at the taping...
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
Last month or maybe longer on blais's blog he had a note that he "couldn't say where he was going on X and Y dates" but we'd be excited to find out, or something like that. And than there were pictures of Marcel on his blog from the same block of dates.
I remembered because I found out the day he was doing a presentation, about an hour from me, and couldn't go, wanted to see if he was there the next day.
I assumed they filmed something to do with the finale but didn't want to add to the spoiler until it was closer to the end. :)
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I thought Stefan did much worse than him! I wonder if I was the only one who thought this.... I'm sad. I really enjoyed Fabio and thought he was a good chef. The last couple of episodes it has seemed like (through intense editing naturally) that Stefan hasn't really been into the whole thing. Too confident.
-
re: Pujielikesmacarons
I agree on his overconfidence - even Colicchio said that at JT. His comment about Hosea's gumbo was obviously completely wrong, as everyone seemed to think that Hosea nailed his gumbo with the dark roux.
But based on what the judges said, Fabio did seem to have a few things more "off" than Stefan. I'm thinking it was a close vote, as they did seem to settle on the Top 3 immediately (still (wish Jeff could have been in the Top, but I understand the way they set up the requirement that he had to win the challenge to remain in the competition), but struggled with who to go home.
While Stefan was wrong in that he had won 10 competitions between QFs and ECs (it has been 8 - 4 each), he has done better than Fabio overall. I think this probably had something to do with why they picked Stefan - although the judges will say they don't count past performance in decisions. I have to believe it sticks in their minds who's done better overall.
-
-
-
re: Sui_Mai
I usually find him very entertaining but based on the last two challenges I think I was overrating his chef skills.
Prior to a couple of weeks ago I thought if he lost it would be because of a self-inflicted meltdown but now I see him as very beatable. Both Hosea and Carla are capable of beating him straight up.-
re: tofuburrito
I do agree that he somehow has lost his mad skillz.
But I do find it interesting that that has co-incided with Carla kicking it up like a thousand notches recently. They just want an interesting finale. Something's cooking for sure.
If you think this show's not getting more and more into the hands of the producers, just ask yourself why Tony Bourdain hasn'y showed up yet.
-
-
re: tofuburrito
Hmmmm. And the plot thickens.
Why is it that I KNOW I'm being manipulated by the producers/editors, but I continue to watch & tell myself that it's "reality"? I have a nephew who would be dynomite on that show, but he (and his colleagues) all agree that the show is too much in the hands of the producers to risk being made "the dumb one", or "the nasty one", or the whatever one.
-
re: tofuburrito
Maybe he was busy/out on the road with one of his own shows. Or maybe *his* producers/network don't want him on the competition.
I don't get why the producers would be against having Tony Bourdain on -- seems to me he's great for attracting viewers/ratings, which is bottom line what's most important to them.
-
re: tofuburrito
To quote Miss Anne Elk, " This theory, which belongs to me, is as follows... This is how it goes...
The next thing that I am about to say is my theory.
Ready?"When he eliminated Dale instead of Lisa in Restaurant Wars season 4, Tom was pretty ticked off. I think we've seen the last of Anthony Bourdain on Top Chef and Toby Young was brought in to fill the witty observation void. Sadly that casting missed by a mile.
They won't find anyone else who could come up with lobster possessing “the consistency of doll head.“
-
re: MplsM ary
Well, one problem with that theory is that no one judge can eliminate a contestant. There are four judges and you have to have a majority (or at least, a plurality, if the vote split 2-1-1), so if Tom was "ticked" about the decision he'd have to be ticked at both of them. In addition, if two people both feel a contestant was the worst, it's hard to argue that their belief is completely baseless.
I never really thought about the fact that there are four judges before, but that must be one factor in some of these long judges' tables we hear about, as I imagine there are ties fairly frequently that have to be resolved through much more discussion.
-
re: MplsM ary
When he eliminated Dale instead of Lisa in Restaurant Wars season 4, Tom was pretty ticked off.
~~~~~~~~~~~
And you know this how? I've never read anything about Tom being mad at AB for eliminating Dale. Disappointed, perhaps, but mad? That goes against the grain of everything that Chef Colicchio saying that viewers don't taste the food, whereas the judges do. If he (Colicchio) hadn't tasted the food that Dale prepared, how can he know whether or not he was worthy of remaining on the show?And as Ruth said above - no one judge can be the person to decide to eliminate a cheftestant. It's a consensus brought about by a LOT of discussion. We've read many times that JT can go on for hours...last season's finale in Puerto Rico was a perfect example - birds were chirping when a decision had been made (I think Ted Allen said they talked for FIVE HOURS to determine who was going to win).
-
re: LindaWhit
Ok, to "ticked off" was a bit strong but I remember reading Tom's blog entry that it seemed to him as a viewer (and how he now sympathized with the viewers who disagree with the judges) that simple math dictated that Lisa should have been sent packing with two bad dishes to Dale's one. I can't find that blog entry, but I do remember he seemed at least a little miffed.
-
re: MplsM ary
But we (those who post here on CH and other viewers on blogs and other websites) have used the "simple math" method in the past (NOTE - based on what we've been ALLOWED TO SEE by the editors). And regardless of what we say, if we don't taste the food, we cannot know whether it was the right decision or not.
I'm fine with Chef Colicchio being miffed at Dale's exit when he wasn't there to judge the food - but at least he now knows how us viewers feel when we see what the editors choose to show the audience.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
OK, i'm *thrilled* for Carla, but so sad for Jeff! :(
shit! Fabio got screwed.
Carla NEEDS to win this thing.
›7 Replies-
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
LOL! I've been noticing it throughout this season....she *always* looks at someone else, and then turns her head slightly. So when she eyeballed Stefan and he gave her the raised eyebrow (yes, I know it's editing and perhaps he didn't do that right at that exact moment!) - I kinda figure it was Fabio who was the goner.
-
-
-
-
-
-
OK, we're at the commercial. Jeff didn't do well enough to win -- he gets a moral victory by being top 3 but he didn't win. So he's out. He didn't beat Carla or Hosea.
So all the editing has Stefan out, overconfident and nothing special. Bad drink. But they need to keep the villain in. So Fabio is the other one eliminated, and we all spend the next week crying foul and reading the blogs for rationalizations.
›24 Replies-
-
re: JanPrimus
I am hoping to see more Fabio in this life of mine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Tom's blog on Bravo's site says that he got to spend some time with Fabio just after this elimination. He was quite impressed with what Fabio has accomplished professionally thus far and implied that there was some big news, which he could not reveal, coming soon from Fabio.
-
-
-
-
-
re: Hurner
Since when is likability irrelevant in a TV show?
Maybe it isn't supposedly a consideration for the judges -- except when they want it to be. Radhika was essentially sent home for her attitude, when you get right down to it. (Of course, I don't think Restaurant Wars is a very interesting or relevant challenge in the context of this show anyhow.) They've weighed whether others have "acted like a chef" before, though they do seem to be pulling that out less often.
But to the home viewers, likability is an enormous part of it. The cheftestants' personalities are the main thing that makes me watch. I don't mind Ted Allen's "Chopped," but since we don't get to know those people, it's far less engaging television. (It's also pretty annoying to people who like food, because the challenge ingredients are so insane. Wonton wrappers, ground beef, banana and cream of mushroom soup? It's like a whole series based around the "Top Chef" vending machine/convenience store challenges, which are really about making gross prepackaged stuff remotely palatable. Well, that and schoolroom lunch table "dare you to mix those two together" games. Ted, fewer gimmicks, please.)
In the four winners of this show so far, they've had two decent human beings in Stephanie and Harold. Hung was a pompous technician who executed boring standards well throughout the competition (hrm, who does that remind me of?). Ilan was a reprehensible person, though no worse than any of his final competitors. That was the season I quit watching before the end because I honestly didn't care which one of those last four nasty jerks won. The personalities are a key factor for me, and I'd bet the same goes for most viewers.
-
re: dmd_kc
I thought this part of Gail's blog at Bravo was rather telling (speaking of Stefan): "....and there's no question he doesn't have the skill, but it's that little piece of thoughtfulness that he's lacking. He's sort of on auto-pilot. It's more of an assembly line with him and with Carla you can really see her mind working with the dishes she produced."
Auto-pilot. Perfect. That's exactly what I see Stefan doing. It's all by rote with him and there's not a lot of thinking about it. That and his dismissiveness of others is what turns me off about him (as he was with Hosea's gumbo, which turned out to be far better than his). I have noticed he hasn't much said anything (or we haven't been shown anything) about Carla and/or her food, other than the brief comment about her meditating a few episodes back.
-
re: LindaWhit
I found it interesting that last night Stefan said Leah is a good chef during the QF. Also, in a Bravo interview posted on the blogs a few weeks ago after Jaime was eliminated, Stefan said he thought Jaime would be the one to beat in the finale. On the other hand, he acts like Carla doesn't exist.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Icantread
I thought it seemed closer between Jeff and Carla when I watched it but then I realized they HAD to make it seem that way for suspense. If it was clear that Jeff's wasn't as good as Hosea or Carla, then he'd definitely be going home and then only one of Fabio or Stefan would have gone. The way they approached it, it could have been Carla or Jeff who would win and so it could have been Team Euro who went home. It's all in the editing because the show made it seem like everything Jeff did was amazing but the blogs show otherwise.
-
-
re: Nettie
I think it almost plays against the judges because when they let someone go, with all that false suspense, people think the judges have made the wrong decision. It's only those of us who overanalyze the whole thing, read the blogs, etc. who figure it out. Or, who care to figure it out.
-
-
-
-
-
I never thought I'd ever say this, but I am glad to see Gail back.
Also, no comments about Padma's outfit?
Sounds like Carla is top two at least.
›8 Replies -
oh, SNAP! did Stefan really just do that???
ok, so i say Stefan is going home...and if Jeff somehow wins, so is Fabio!
›32 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: lisavf
I adore Fabio but is anyone else having trouble believing his “seeck MAma een Eetaly” and the “peees of poop car” stories? His restaurant in Moorpark looks pretty nice: http://www.cafefirenze.net/page.cfm?P....
-
-
-
re: rweater
Yes, true, I've known people like that too. Since my post I've read several interviews with Fabio posted on amuse-biatch in which he states that the editors made it seem like his mother is dying, when in reality she has to have surgery on her hand every six months (which sounds strange to me) and can no longer work. He also said that he sold his three(!) restaurants in Italy to come here.
In true Fabio fashion, he also said this:
"[Bravo:] Is she [his mom] proud of how far you got in the competition?
"[Fabio:] You know what? She doesn’t even know what’s going on. She know I’m on the show, but it’s hard to realize your son is on national TV because in Italy we don’t have these things. In Italy, if you are going on TV, it’s because you killed a whole family somewhere or you robbed a bank."
and
"[Bravo:] Do chefs make good lovers?
"[Fabio:] Chefs make great lovers, 'cause if you don’t please them while you’re having sex, you please them while you’re making dinner. I please them in both cases."
http://amuse-biatch.blogspot.com/I *heart* him. lol
-
re: pisang goreng
In Italy, if you are going on TV, it’s because you killed a whole family somewhere or you robbed a bank.
~~~~~
ROFLMAO!!! This guy cracks me up - he SO needs to get his own show!ETA: Oh WAIT! It looks like Bravo is giving him a show!
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hope you liked my face, because unfortunately, you’re going to be seeing a lot of it.ANOTHER TV SHOW? TELL US MORE!
Aaah, I can’t say yet, but let me just say - Watch What Happens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~Interesting!
-
-
-
-
re: roxlet
Somehow, curses are the first thing that sticks in the head of anyone learning a new language especially as a culture immersion. Even traveling, I tend to pick up the idioms along with the basics such as where is the bathroom. The grammar is secondary, the basics come first and cursing is a very expressive way to get along.
-
re: TampaAurora
As I think someone else said here, part of the charm of a lot of foreign speakers of any language is how they use jargon and cursing. I lived in France and finally got the hang of their marvelous wealth of profanity. But now I understand why some of the things I said at first were hilarious to my peers.
It's also why you sometimes blanch at a foreign speaker of your tongue using a particularly bad curse inappropriately sometimes. It's one of the very hardest things to catch on to in learning a new language -- hence some people's taking great offense at Fabio's "Top Pu***" joke. Or how a Brit friend of mine cleared a room by laughingly calling her new father-in-law the C-word at the wedding reception.
Oops!
-
-
-
re: ChefJune
Actually, Yogi's first language was probably Italian as well; he was born to Italian immigrant parents, and grew up in a neighborhood of Italian immigrants. He only went to school through the 8th grade. The things Yogi said DID make sense - to Yogi - and were part of his "charm", just as Fabio's use of idiomatic English is a part of his charm.
-
-
re: thew
And I would be willing to bet you weren't born in 1925. Very different time, particularly for immigrants: very limited means to go outside of the confines of the ethnic neighborhood, limited access to radio and, of course, no TV. Believe me, I am not knocking Fabio's linguistic accomplishments, nor yours, but the continual bombardment of and exposure to the sound of English through TV, radio and movies today makes picking up English easier than it was back then. My daughter-in-law taught for several years in a school in Queens where the student population was heavily Guyanese/Indian. In addition to the English spoken at school, the other primary source of English education for the kids (as well as for many of the parents) was what they got from TV.
-
-
re: Phaedrus
Very true. DH and I were born in the US and are children of immigrants. We speak English without a foreign accent. However, we didn't grow up in a Chinatown or a Koreatown, and a lot of our friends were not Chinese or Korean. But I know many Chinese-Americans who were born in America (or came here at the age of 2 or 3) and raised in Chinatowns and were not allowed to stray far away. If you listen to them speak, one would probably think they came to America as a teenager even though they've been living here for almost all of their lives.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: pisang goreng
Be careful visiting his web site, after I landed on his home page I clicked on a link to the "blog" and a new page opened up, but simultaneously my security software alerted me: "About this Trojan
Detected: Exploit-IFrame.gen.c (Trojan), Exploit-IFrame.gen.c (Trojan)
Location: C:\Users..."I am not saying that the restaurant is purposely sending out a trojan, just beware if clicking through.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
If I was betting now, at the commercial, Jeff didn't make it -- didn't win. From the editing, you gotta think Stefan is vulnerable -- they have been making him out to be so cocky and the last cut showed him making a f-u motion at judge's table, but as we all know the editing is meant to deceive. From the comments they loved Carla's and Hosea's dishes, and thought Fabio's was good but lacked heat.
-
-
-
-
Roux doesn't have to be black. Walnut colored rouxs work with lighter gumbos. Too dark a roux overwhelms the finer protein flavors.
›3 Replies -
Carla is glowing about the dresses and outfits. An Fabio thinks the masks reminds him of a porno movie. He's hilarious! He is definitely Italian.
›2 Replies -
-
re: The Chowfather
only (to be honest) if they don't make them do food this limited the whole time. i am NOT knocking cajun or creole food but i actually think it would get kitschy really fast if they stuck to that. and i'm also not saying that in NOLA they'd have to stick with that. just that they shouldn't
-
FYI Tom Radicchio, Corn Maque Choux is Creole.
http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/em... -
-
-
re: LindaWhit
love her. and i LOVE that she helped even in the finale. i mean that's awesome.
although to be honest it almost looked like if he had time stefan would've helped her back - just not hosea or jeff.
i can see helping people you like but not those you don't. my guess is carla likes more people than stefan - and that makes her happier. more love to put in her food. :)
-
-
-
-
-
And to wade back into the fray, I really do think the Jeff and Jamie are deserving of another chance, but Leah? Oy!
Her dish was kind of ...eh.
I liked Jeff's and Jamie's though.
Interesting twist. he has to win the whole challenge to get back in.
›4 Replies -
-
agreed that i'd be pissed if i was a contestant...but as a viewer, i LOVE it! unfortunately i want Jeff to win, and i think it's gonna be Jamie...
HAPPY DANCE!!!! but damn, that's a tough qualification. sheesh.
›4 Replies -
-
-























