how can i quickly defrost a chicken without a micro wave any suggestions?
any suggestions on a quick way to defrost a quartered chicken for dinner tonight?
-
-
Agreed, the baggie in cold water method is the way to go, but I don't think the trickle is necessary, and it wastes water. Instead, use a metal pot or if using plastic or glass, put that on a metal pan, preferably setting the metal atop a cooling rack. The cold will dissipate into the metal, while the additional air circulation provided by the rack will remove the cold from the metal so it keeps on removing it from the water.
›8 Replies-
re: greygarious
Not disagreeing with you, but the reasoning behind the water trickle is to keep the water temperature from rising into the "danger zone" by constantly supplying a fresh supply of cold water. In the case of uncovered meats in running water (local Health District recommended), the running water also dilutes any forming nasties and rinses them down the drain.
-
re: hannaone
The thing that's never made sense to me about the running water advice is that cold tap water is likely to be warmer than the water with the frozen chicken or whatever in it. That lump of frozen meat takes the water temp way down (think ice water), definitely colder than tap water unless your pipes are nearly freezing.
-
re: Karen_Schaffer
I'm fairly sure that the health district came up with this recommendation because of those who let the meats sit in still water long past the defrost point.
These agencies are pretty good with developing policies and rules to protect us from ourselves and our unsafe ways. ;-P (said very much tongue in cheek)
-
-
re: hannaone
I don't think your assertion is entirely correct. While the trickling water may wash some nasties away, it's more about thermodynamics.
The movement of the water will pull the cold out of the food faster. Leaving it sit in water will thaw it, but not as fast. The air flow Grey mentioned is a similar concept, except that water will pull the cold much faster than air due to density. (The air is less dense, and takes less energy to change it's temp. Water requires more energy due to higher density, and therefor pulls cold faster.)
-
-
re: Pylon
In addition to the thermodynamics, though, the tap water will almost certainly be warmer than the water it's displacing, so it's working on two levels to thaw the food faster.
But if maximum speed isn't the issue, then I'd go with the still water bath because it keeps the food cooler, which is safer. It only takes 20 minutes in a cold water bath to thaw frozen shimp and doesn't waste so much water (says the drought aware Californian).
-
-
-
What they said, with these details: I'd separate it further than quarters. Keep them as flat as possible. Put in a plastic bag and smoosh out every bit of air you can, then use the cold water trickle in a big bowl method.
I've never had it work in 20 minutes, but 45 will do ya.
-
Place the meat uncovered in an aluminum pan.
Works like a charm.
Aluminum is a great conductor of heat.
›6 Replies -
Put the pieces in a ziplock bag, in a single layer. Put them in a tall, relatively narrow container (e.g., a pitcher) and put something on top -- a can of tomatoes, whatever -- to weigh them down. Fill the pitcher with COLD water, then leave it under the spigot with a tiny trickle of cold water running into it -- just a TINY trickle. Boneless breasts will thaw in 30 minutes, thicker pieces a little longer.
-
-
-
-
-






