-
-
Grapeseed is good. The choice in the French Laundry is canola. I'd like to place a bet that no one who says they can smell canola in a blind taste can distinguish is from 5 oils (obviously I wouldn't put nut oils in the mix). Canola is probably the most neutral oil. Peanut, neutral??? You use it for its high smoke temp and but definitely not its neural flavor--it's the total opposite..
›2 Replies-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I agree with grapeseed being more neutral--rice bran I've been itching to try but haven't yet. My contention is that I highly doubt someone could pick out canola from five other oils. My guess is that maybe 1 person out of 100 could distinguish them in a blind test. The great wine critic Harry Waugh was once asked if he'd ever mistaken burgundy for bordeaux, his answer was, "not since lunch". It's great when people are put to a test on things they think they know a lot about. Like fine vodka--when they do blind tastings with premium vodkas, people prefer the cheap crap, if it's served a little colder than the high end stuff because the flaws are hidden by the chill. What's the answer, buy expensive vodka or just chill the cheaper stuff.
That might be a fun thing, an blind neutral oil tasting. Personally, I like using lard...
-
-
-
I usually use canola oil (cheap). What has more trans fat or saturated fat? Canola or peanut oil?
›3 Replies-
-
-
re: food_eater79
Smell may go away, but taste doesn't, and to me, canola tastes as nasty as it smells.
I think this whole fad for "healthy" oils is just that, a fad. Sure it makes a difference for laboratory anaylsis, but out in the real world, the way real people eat, I'm very skeptical there's a significant impact on health from using different oils.
Let's not forget that it wasn't that long ago that nutritionists were telling us to use transfat-laden margerine instead of butter because it was healthier. Just remember that like today's recommendations for canola oil, that was the recommendation based on the state of the art of nutrition science at the time.
Canola oil is not a natural product -- in the long term, I'd rather trust oils and other fats that have been part of the human diet for milennia than fats designed by agribusiness to be "good for us."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I grew up with safflower oil, though this high-monounsaturate stuff is a new twist. Otherwise, I agree with JoanN about grapeseed oil re greasiness but find that true of safflower as well but end up using whatever's around the kitchen. I used to be able to find grapeseed oil at a decent price but no more so I gave up on that. For deep-frying, I must confess I'm too cheap to use peanut oil only once and too lazy to filter with too small a fridge to save it so I go for soybean and corn oil in gallons when they're on sale and just toss the oil when I'm done....
It's a little interesting that no one's mentioned filtered olive oil. It can be virgin or extra-virgin but as long as it's filtered, it also has a high smoking point...
›8 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
re: food_eater79
Yes, I've always been told that EV olive oil in particular has too high a smoke point to be good for frying. But I'm not sure that's correct. And Batali seems to think that smoke point isn't all that matters:
"The smoking point of an oil is the temperature at which it will start to smoke and turn harsh or bitter. The oils typically recommended for deep-frying have smoke points of around 440 F to 450 F -- peanut, corn, and safflower oil are at the high end, grapeseed and canola are slightly lower. The smoking point of olive oil is quite a bite lower, around 375 F. According to logic, then, and a whole lot of "food science experts," it would seem that frying in extra-virgin olive oil would result in burnt flavor or soggy undercooked foods. But anyone who has ever eaten an artichoke "alla Giudia" in Rome knows this not to be the case, and olive oil is my oil of choice for deep-frying."
-- Molto Italiano, p. 24I hasten to say that I don't do high-heat frying with olive oil myself, but I thought this was interesting. I tend to trust Batali on these things.
-
re: jlafler
Well, the clue is that the type of frying Italians tend to do is in the mid-300s and often is not long in duration.
I would not do American fried chicken in EVOO, for example.
The other things is that EVOO is frightfully expensive for deep frying in quantity, and that's waste. Batali can pass those costs on to his patrons. I can't....
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Peanut, bought by the gallon in Chinatown for Asian cooking and all deep-fat frying, and grapeseed for just about everything else.
›2 Replies -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: foodsmith
Coconut is not healthy - it's got the bad fats. Nutritionist on one of the PBS cooking shows I watched just yesterday said to avoid foods containing coconut oil and noted that when shipping regulations changed so that it was no longer feasible for the (Swedes, I think - or possibly Norwegians) to import a lot of coconuts, their rate of heat disease dropped 25%.
-
re: greygarious
I believe that is based on outdated research and depending on the processing it can be the healthiest kind. I will double check this, the research on these things changes. The kind I buy is in a jar and is a congealed white solid that you have to scoop out with a spoon and it melts on the pan. It is not liquid form like the kind you buy at the supermarket. It's hard to find anywhere but at health food stores.
-
-
-
-
-










