If You Could Have One Bottle... Any Bottle
Thought it would be fun to ask what wine you'd want if you could choose ANY wine in the world for free. Perhaps you had it once and were blown away by it... or a wine that you've never tried but always wanted to.
Price is not to be a factor... it must be a wine you'd drink... not pick a wine that's super expensive just so you can say you'd sell it.
I don't want to influence the replies so I'll wait a bit to add what I'm thinking of...
-
to be brutally honest, and I don't want to sound like a nutcase... but I would love to have a glass of wine from the sermon on the mount.
›2 Replies -
SCARY THOUGHT:
There are, if I counted correctly, 41 specific wines mentioned as of 10 January 2009 @ 6:30 pm PST.
For example, I am counting "1931 Quinta do Noval Nacional", but NOT "[t]he "Rochioli" bottling from Wliiams-Selyem" as it lacks a specific vintage.
I think I've had 31 of them . . . that's just sick!
›8 Replies -
-
-
I'd choose a Magnum of 1870 Chateau Lafite Rothschild from the Glamis Castle.
I've included Michael Broadbent's notes from a NY Christies listing for a magnum that was up for auction in 2000... it sold for $32,000.... today it would bring more.
Château Lafite-Rothschild--Vintage 1870
This was unquestionably one of the most famous and dependable of all pre-phylloxera clarets. The wine was purchased by the 13th Earl from his wine merchant, Coningham, and binned in the cellars beneath the raised courtyard of the castle in 1878.
Of the forty-eight magnums originally purchased, forty-two remained untouched until packed and removed prior to the sale. The reason for this extraordinary situation is that Lafite 1870 was an unusually tannic wine, virtually black in colour and so tough that it took a full fifty years to become drinkable, by which time subsequent members of the family had lost interest. Forty-one magnums were sold in lots of three and six, the first lot including the original bin label inscribed "1870 magnums Lafitte (sic) Coningham", with the meticulously maintained Glamis Castle cellarbook open for inspection.
One magnum was opened at a pre-sale dinner in Christie's boardroom early in June 1971 attended by a dozen of England's most erudite Bordeaux connoisseurs. The wine, happily, was perfect. My note made at the time : " perfect cork and level; remarkably deep and richly coloured; faultless - indeed exquisite - bouquet and flavour; beautifully balanced, mouthfilling, still tannic but velvety. Perfection". MB›9 Replies-
re: WineAG
NB: Mention of the power of the wine is lacking. Having tasted some high-end, 1925-1928 Burgundies recently, I can understand the careful wording of the note. Wines fade and lose their power with time. Wine is born, lives, and dies. It reminds me of the 1989 Lafitte. It is now perfectly balanced and very refined, but it is not a truly great wine because is not as powerful as the greats, nor will it ever be. But I certainly woud have liked to have tasted it 60 or 80 years ago!
-
re: Joebob
I've had the 1870 Lafite on 3 occasions. The first time was on the occasion of Napa pioneer Barney Rhodes' 70th birthday party at the Ritz Carlton in SF when Gary Danko was the chef (FYI, Barney passed away last year at the age of 88). It was, and still is, the greatest wine I've ever had. It was from a Glamis Castle magnum that was purchased at auction many years prior. It was still youthful, dark in color, had perfect balance, great fruit, amazing depth, as smooth as silk mouthfeel... a finish that was never ending. So perfect words really cannot describe it properly. I had never had anything that remotely came close to this masterpiece. For contrast, It was also served along side the 1959 and the 1876 Lafites. The 1876 was very light in color... it was opened to show how very special this 1870 was... the 1876 was very mature, drinkable, but had certainly past it's prime. The 1959, another legendary Lafite, was still a young wine... fantastic, youthful, intense. What was amazing to see was that the 1870's color was as dark and vibrant as the 59.
The second time I had it was from another Glamis Magnum, and equally as good.
The third time, about 7 years ago, was from a Magnum that a friend brought to a special dinner.... when he bought it it was billed as a bottle that was "believed to be" from the Glamis Castle. This wine, while very good, was in no way even remotely close to the other mags. Obviously not from the castle.
Yes, there's a reason the Glamis Castle bottles are so prized. It was a combination of perfect very cold storage along with a fantastic wine that was built for the very long term. There can't be many of these mags around still.
-
-
-
-
-
re: Joebob
Interesting. Actually some people prefer to keep their cellars at a lower temp than the traditional 55 degrees... say 50 - 52. Some keep them a little warmer. Personally, Im a fan of 55 (if anything a degree or 2 warmer). These minor differences really don't make that much difference. The most important factor is that the temp is CONSTANT.
Here's the main thing to consider. The COLDER the temp you keep the cellar, the SLOWER the wines will age. This was dramatically shown with the Glamis Castle bottles.
Another aspect that's important for collectors to consider is the humidity level. If it's too low the corks will dry out and the wine will oxidize. It is believed the humidity level at the castle was 75%, ideal.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
In the late 1960's Mason Williams (Classical Gas, Smother's Brother's writer, etc.) published the "Mason Williams' reader.) In the book, he outlines "how to enjoy crackers."
It seems appropriate to use a variation on his theme for this subject:1. Rent a dive motel room.
2. Place 10lbs of salad mix in a large trash bag in the room
3. Have a 1 gallon jug of ranch dressing also at the bedsidePick up your girlfriend or wife for a "date." Take her to the motel room, have her completely undress on the bed. Cover her with the salad; she will be protesting as you slowly add the ranch dressing, but assure her everything is fine and as planned.
Then shout: "I forgot the crackers!"
Leave the dive motel, take a cab to the finest 4-star hotel in town. Rent a room, go upstairs and order crackers and--for this posting--the bottle of wine you've always wanted.
When the wine and crackers are delivered, get undressed, climb into bed and savor the first taste. It will be the best wine you've ever tasted....
›4 Replies -
-
Taurino, "Notarpanaro" Rosso di Salento 1988 - I was in college and just discovering wine. This wine was the first that fully revealed itself to me. I will never forget it, and oh, to be 20 years old again, at 34th & Hamilton in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at my friend Shola's apartment, listening to Deadcandance and This Mortal Coil and The Cocteau Twins and The Smiths, while finishing at Drexel University.
Thank you to all that remember
-
-
1982 Chateau Prieure Lichine Margaux. We had one bottle, given to us, by a co-worker and friend of my husband, the year we were married (1995). My husband helped the guy remove the burner from his boiler in his basement because the river was rising and his home was threatened by flood. He was most appreciative he gave us a bottle of his most treasured wine. He had brought a case of it home from France years prior. My understanding is that 1982 was a legendary year.
We kept the bottle for several years and when we opened, decanted and drank it on our anniversary - well, it was exceptionally good. The deep, ruby color I have never seen before or since. I later googled it and found that same vintage was being sold for $800+ back then.
-
-
1961 Latour -- cuz I was born in that year. And this is pure fantasy. I don't expect I'll have a Bordeaux from my birth year when I turn fifty (or any other age, for that matter).
›4 Replies-
re: Brad Ballinger
This is my choice too. Around 30 years ago -- when I was just beginning to learn about wines -- I was privileged to attend a tasting of the 1961 first growths. Latour was my favorite then and I expect would still be today. I've never had any of the 61s again and don't know that I ever will. But the nostalgia factor plus the quality of this wine would make it my first choice.
-
-
-
-
re: whiner
90 LT is a phenomenal wine... one of the greats. My greatest La Tache experience was the 71 from magnum (incredible sweet fruit and a finish that never ended... followed by the 78 (mostly great bottles with a few that didn't live up to what it should be). The 78 is more powerful than the 71. Good bottles are insanely great. Another great vintage, the 1962 is one I've always wanted to try. The 1990 is a powerhouse. Last time I had it was about 7 years ago... still a baby. It does seem to fit the mold of legendary LTs and will be long lived.
Another point... the 1990 vintage may be the greatest "across the board" (all types of wines from all countries) vintage of our lifetime.
-
-
-
-
re: mengathon
Another legendary wine. I've been lucky enough to try it on a few occasions. Appropriate that it comes right after the mention of the Quinta National... as this Bordeaux is almost port-like. Very a-typical... incredible concentration. I remember the finish lasting forever.
Since you mentioned the 47, for those who may be interested... I recently received notice of a wine dinner centered around the 1947 Cheval Blanc to be held in Boston at Troquet Restaurant on Jan 14, 2009. Also pouring the 1985, 1983, 1982, 1990. Expectedly, not cheap. For anyone interested, contact Troquet or email me directly and I'll send you the details.
-
-
re: WineAG
my absolute favorite resto in boston, for precisely that reason... wine dinners like that. i happened to be there on a night where there was a collector's dinner featuring Unico from 13 or so vintages... and was lucky enough to get to taste some phenomenal old wines. and the food is magnificent.
-
-
-
-













