Creative Director of Chow Thinks Your Comments are "Worthless"
Apprently Jeremy LaCroix (creative director of Chow) spoke at a panel last night and had this to say about us:
"LaCroix noted that advertisers were terrified of commenters, and didn't want to be positioned anywhere near the chatting. They prefer chow.com to chowhound.com—Chowhound is the chattiest. "Do I think most of the comments are worthless? Yes, I do," LaCroix said."
Quote is from the Radar Online recap of the event.
oh, very nice.
and advertisers are terrified of being near thread posts? well gee, they must not be too afraid, 'cause the ads are ALL OVER the freakin' screen!
and do more people actually *read* chow vs. chowhound?
i do believe mr. lacroix owes this community a big, public apology. maybe HIS job is worthless, too. (i'm sure he'll think this thread is *especially* "worthless." )
No, alkapal, that part's true: advertisers do indeed prefer placement amid static, controllable content. It's not a function of how good an online forum is....they're scared of them, period. That's one reason why after Chowhound was acquired by CNET they brought on CHOW...to provide the sort of static, controlled editorial content that advertisers prefer.
- The original comment has been removed
It certainly doesn't sound like Jeremy. I texted him about it -- he's on his way back to SF from NY -- and asked him about it. He's stunned by this recap. But I'll let him respond. He's getting on the plane, so it will probably be around eight hours.
For what it's worth, we've had many, many discussions about how to encourage MORE feedback and comments.... "Worthless" is about as unlikely an opinion from him as I can imagine.
re: Ima Wurdibitsch
"They prefer chow.com to chowhound.com—Chowhound is the chattiest."
that is -- the advertisers prefer chow because chowhound commenters are [too] chatty. the advertisers are afraid of being near the commenter's comments. comments are posted on the blogs" and "reviews." the "comments" referred to are those made by chowhounds. the only "comments" on chowhound are, in fact, posts and replies on threads (unless i am missing somewhere on chowhound where "comments" are solicited).
unless mr. lacroix was misquoted, it would seem clear that he is characterizing chowhounders' comments as "worthless."
i tell you what, some of those things on chow that allow comments --- THOSE are the "worthless" things. like that ridiculous "table manners."