Best Steakhouse in Boston? (Ribeye)
Just wondering what the general consensus was for best steakhouse in Boston. I plan on taking a steak-lover out and would love to show him the best Boston has to offer! I believe his favorite cut is rib-eye, but he may be willing to venture out to a diff cut if it sounds good ;-) So I guess this would narrow down to best rib-eye in town.
I did a quick search, and couldn't really find a topic like this, but if there is, please post the link!
Thanks!
-
-
-
-
Not a steakhouse but wonderful ribeye. My wife and I recently had dinner at Dante in Cambridge (outdoor patio was perfect at sunset and none of the steakhouses can compete on that aspect) and their ribeye was outstanding. Perfectly cooked and seasoned.
›4 Replies -
-
-
re: Gabatta
The Cajun Ribeye at Morton's IS weirdly good. Not sure why I even tried it. I think a DC had it and offered a bite. It's just some sort of rub or quick marinade that doesn't taint the beautifully marbled interior.
But for traditional, I'd say Grill 23 or Mooo are the best. Though I have a soft spot for Abe & Louie's.
-
-
-
No doubt about it, a bone-in Ribeye is my favorite cut.
My second favorite cut?
Why of course that would be a boneless Ribeye!
Pencil me in for the Oak Room, well actually, the Oak Bar's 20 oz. bone-in Ribeye above all contenders.
But I will give a big nod to rlh's rec for Grill 23's as well.Harp
›2 Replies -
I like the bone-in ribeye at Abe & Louis where you can also get some aged cheddar or blue cheese melted on top.
›4 Replies -
-
re: catsmeow
Ruth's Chris exclusively "Wet Ages" it's beef which is definitely inferior to the more traditional dry aging process. In wet aging the beef is aged in a plastic vacupac bag and thus the meat does not lose any weight as a result of moisture loss. Weight loss = money loss so wet aging is MUCH cheaper.
Dry aging concentrates the flavor of meat and results in a FAR superior complex beefy flavor.
-
-
re: wittlejosh
In conversations about steaks, inevitably Peter Luger's comes up. The dry aged Porterhouse for two that I ate there changed my view of what a steak could taste like. Beefy, Juicy, foie gras like, luscious.
I personally think wet aging makes steaks mushy and soggy, a bit like wet paper towels, and adds nothing to the flavor.
-
-
-
re: Infomaniac
I know more than a few people who prefer wet-aging to dry, citing the gaminess as the major factor. I don't, but I wouldn't consider it inferior per se. 99% of people will go through life without ever having tasted dry-aged beef. And 99% of people will go through life without really tasting beef that's any good, IMHO, since I think most of the beef out there in the past 10 years is pretty awful, prime, choice, dry, wet, whatever.
-
-
-
It is not Ruth's Chris - the bone-in Cowboy ribeye is fine, just fine, but not memorable. Smith and Willensky was far superior and it's been a long time for me, but I still remember an amazing steak from Grill 23 - and it's a truly local spot (I think), not a national chain - another plus.
›1 Reply -







