Gramercy Tavern or Blue Hill (NYC) for dinner?
I have reservations at both restaurants for dinner next week, and I'm trying to decide between the two. From what I've read on CH, it sounds like both restaurants emphasize the use of fresh ingredients and solid (but not very creative) cooking.
In terms of our tastes, we actually tend to like more modern/creative cooking (Jean-Georges/EMP) a little better than traditional (Telepan), but since these two places are highly rated we wanted to give the latter style another shot.
If you've been to both restaurants, I'd appreciate your advice on picking between the two. Thanks in advance!
- The original comment has been removed
As much as I love Blue Hill, I'd give the nod to Gramercy-in my book, they are one of the best restaurants in NY at this time...Michael Anthony's cooking is inspired. And the chocolate bread pudding is the best dessert in NY.
I ate at Blue Hill last week and Gramercy in the past few months. Both are excellent, you can't make a mistake. I would lean a bit towards Blue Hill as there was something fresher about it... but if it was winter I'd pick Gramercy
Agree that you couldn't go wrong with either choice. My most recent experience was Blue Hill and everything was top notch.
If atmosphere is important, GT is much bigger and tables spaced a bit more. Blue Hill is small, dark and tight tables.
re: kim e
Thanks everyone. I'm also looking at the price difference and it looks like Blue Hill's tasting is about $70, while GT's is around $110. Anyone have any thoughts on the price difference, ie while both are "equally" good according to the replies so far, is Blue Hill just a much better value than GT, or is it just reflective of the fact that you get fewer courses or less food?