HOME > Chowhound > Washington DC & Baltimore >

Fogo (DC) vs. Chima (Tysons)

j
johanson Jun 23, 2008 05:39 AM

We love Fogo in DC and have been several times. We'd like to try Chima -- but have heard some negative things about it. Anyone been to both and care to compare?

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. b
    bordeauxfan RE: johanson Jun 23, 2008 05:58 AM

    There's a VERY recent thread about regional Brazilian steakhouses on this board. I'm pretty sure this comparison is discussed.

    1. BigEats RE: johanson Jun 23, 2008 06:20 AM

      And don't forget Texas de Brazil in Fair Oaks Mall. I've been to all three and it's a toss-up. Good "salad" bar and good meats, neither one great, too much of both, and not a dieter's destination.

      1. d
        dcskinsfan RE: johanson Jun 23, 2008 06:52 AM

        I've eaten at both numerous times and would say that Fogo's meats are much more flavorful. Their cold bar and rice and beans selections (feijoada) are more extensive and also tastier. They're both about the same price so I think for the money, Fogo is the way to go. Can't comment about Texas de Brazil since I haven't been. Either place you choose, make sure you're hungry.

        1. a
          AlexDer RE: johanson Jun 24, 2008 12:33 AM

          Beef ribs at Chima are much better than Fogo's in my opinion. All of the other meats were better at Fogo is better in my opinion including the dessert options. Chima offers swordfish and some other seafood for one of the selections during Dinner and Fogo does not. Chima has a much more modern/trendy setting.

          1. m
            MikeR RE: johanson Jun 24, 2008 04:37 AM

            What kind of differences are you looking for, or are important to you? Neither one has bad food. Chima is slightly less expensive and the parking is free. General opinion is that the meat at Fogo is better but it's not like day or night, and besides, you go to those places at least partially to stuff yourself slightly beyond good taste.

            If Chima is really out of your way and Fogo is convenient, I'd stick with Fogo. If it's no hassle to get to Tyson's Corner, give it a try. It won't suck, as long as you don't find something that bugs you you'll enjoy it, and you can make up your own mind.

            Me, I go to Malibu Grill when I feel like stuffing myself. The meat isn't as tender as the high priced churrascarias but for this non-gourmet, a satisfying dinner costs half as much as if I went downtown and it's just 3 miles from home with free parking. I recognize the better quality at twice the price, but when I think of Argentine cowboys and what they might eat, the more homey quality somehow seems more authentic. Your tastebuds and jaw muscles may differ. <g>

            2 Replies
            1. re: MikeR
              e
              Ericandblueboy RE: MikeR Jun 24, 2008 05:31 AM

              Nice way to put it.

              1. re: MikeR
                f
                FoodieGrrl RE: MikeR Jun 24, 2008 02:26 PM

                "It won't suck..."

                Hehehe.

                FWIW, I like the Chima space -airier and lighter and funkier than Fogo. But in general, the food at Fogo is slightly better.

              2. l
                lidi b RE: johanson Jun 24, 2008 08:56 AM

                I happen to live in the Tysons area and just got a 2 for 1 coupon in the mail for Chima--so that'd be my vote (at half price!!) We got the same coupon about 6-8 months ago and the server was very gracious when we used it, even though it was a Saturday night (the coupon had no restrictions)

                1. l
                  lcool RE: johanson Jun 26, 2008 06:00 AM

                  Texas in Brazil is in front of Chima . If you care about SERVICE / WINE LIST & PREMIUM MEAT,stay with Fogo.It is way out front in every way.

                  The service we have had at Green Fields & Chima has without exception been poor,the size of party was not a factor.We won't return.

                  Show Hidden Posts