<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<topic>
  <id>530212</id>
  <title>Washington Post Restaurant Reviews</title>
  <published_at>Wed Jun 18 08:24:05 -0700 2008</published_at>
  <post_count>2</post_count>
  <board>
    <id>33</id>
    <name>Food Media and News</name>
  </board>
  <posts>
    <post>
      <post>
        <level>0</level>
        <id>3790501</id>
        <content>I'm not sure if this thread will be removed for not being exclusively about food, but here goes nothing...

I've been having a heck of a time trying to find things on the Food and Dining portion of The Washington Post&#8217;s website.  A few months ago they changed the site's appearance, and ever since then I haven't been able to quickly locate Tom Sietsema&#8217;s new (and old) restaurant reviews.  It seems like the page is cluttered with recipes I&#8217;m not interested in, blurbs about areas or groups of restaurants that aren&#8217;t specifically &#8220;reviews&#8221;, and miscellaneous articles that only get between me and the information I&#8217;m actually interested in.  

I think the problem is that the restaurant reviews aren&#8217;t listed under the name of the restaurant, but rather a brief sentence that summarizes the review.  That said, I still have a very difficult time actually finding Tom&#8217;s most recent reviews.  I&#8217;ve sent emails to the Post with the complaint that, in short, the newly designed website is extremely difficult to navigate.  Please tell me I&#8217;m not crazy and there are others who share my sentiment&#8230;  
</content>
        <published_at>Wed Jun 18 08:24:07 -0700 2008</published_at>
        <parent_id></parent_id>
        <user>
          <id>126991</id>
          <name>aburkavage</name>
        </user>
      </post>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>3791144</id>
      <content>you're not crazy and your complaints aren't limited to the food section...

its navigation is astoundingly counterintuitive.</content>
      <published_at>Wed Jun 18 10:48:27 -0700 2008</published_at>
      <parent_id>3790501</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>163722</id>
        <name>hill food</name>
      </user>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>3791280</id>
      <content>I've also sent a complaint about the food section redo when they first did it. I had the same issue, and had trouble determining what is an actual food section article versus miscellaneous filler.  </content>
      <published_at>Wed Jun 18 11:17:37 -0700 2008</published_at>
      <parent_id>3790501</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>13808</id>
        <name>Jason1</name>
      </user>
    </post>
  </posts>
</topic>
