-
-
Others apparently disagree, but I've eaten at all of the restaurants mentioned above in the last several months (except Taylor's), and did not think any of the steaks were as good as Capo on Ocean Ave. in Santa Monica.
In terms of a place to have a birthday dinner, this is easy. STK or BLT is your call.
›1 Reply -
-
-
-
re: feedthebelly
I ate at STK last night and thought it was more sizzle than steak. High celeb quotient. The duck was good. The shrimp appetizer, too. The steak was OK, but nothing special.
-
-
-
I have had good steaks at BOA. Not as good as Cut, but tasty nonetheless. BLT also got a nice review in the LA Times this week. I have only attended a cocktail party there with appetizers, but I ate a great meal at the BLT in D.C. Taylor's has a cool, retro vibe, but the food quality is not quite at the level of some other places I have been to in LA.
›3 Replies-
-
re: lakeshow318
have not been to cut or wolfgang's, but i enjoy boa (santa monica) and jar conistently and significantly more than mastro's. depending on your mood, boa in santa monica can be a bit of a scene, and jar more relaxed, but i find both to have great steaks, drinks and sides consistenly. maybe he "massive" steak is what i don;t like about mastro's it's always more chewy than tasty to me.
-
-
-
-
-
If Cut offers the benchmark steak in Los Angeles, then we're in trouble.
Since you ask for "best steak," not "steakhouse," I have to say that the finest I've had in my home town in a long time was the excellent juicy, flavorful, and rosy-red piece of beef at the far end of the Water Grill tasting menu recently. Unlike a few of the other dishes on that predominately fish and seafood menu, it was delicious and cooked perfectly. I assume that they offer the same cut (small "c") a la carte. By the way, one of the several desserts -- was it a tropical-fruit sorbet? -- was so delicious that my plate went back to the kitchen shelf unwashed. Honest.
›3 Replies-
-
re: barno
Hate to disagree, but took my mother in law and the family to the Rosecrans Flemings about a month ago and was deeply disappointed. The food was overpriced and mediocre at best. The porterhouse special -- and a pricey special at that -- was a very poor quality of meat and almost tasteless. My wife's filet: maybe okay, but again, for the money, not a very good cut of beef. The mashed potatoes were glooey and too salty. And the cheesecake dessert was a complete rip off. A tiny, tiny, cube of something vaguely like cheescake for $10!! Sorry, I don't mind paying a lot for a good meal or a good dessert, but in this case we got neither. I would never go there again and would strongly advise that you go someplace else if you want a good steak, decent sides, and anything close to value for your money.
-
re: barno
I had a bad experience with El Segundo Fleming's as well. Waiter spilled sauce on one of the diners and not even an offer of free dessert or other effort to make up for ruining a pair of slacks other than half-hearted "sorry." Didn't even offer to pay for dry cleaning. Weak. Steak is OK, but falls below top end steakhouses in LA (Cut, Wolfgang's, Palm, Mastro's). Wine list horribly overpriced.
-
-
-
-
Wolfgang's, Wolfgang's, Wolfgang's. It's all abot the beef -- and this is as good as it gets in town. Mastro's steak not quite as good as Wolfgang's (but still a great steak) but one helluva scene upstairs at the bar.
›3 Replies -
-
-
-
-
re: SecretHeadquarters
Just got back from Taylor's in La Canada and can't complain. There have been many better steaks, but for about $100 for two with a good bottle of wine, this experience is hard to beat. The steaks are fine if not great. If you are out for a good steak dinner and a nice experience, rather than a religious foodie revelation with the disappointment potential that involves, this is a no frills, no complaints, comfortable place.
-
-
-
-
Jar on Beverly: Kansas City Strip or Rib-Eye...unf@#*ing believable...hip room/gr-8 service.
Taylor's on 8th St. : Filet Mignon like fist; delicious and groovy room.
›2 Replies-
re: DeePocketChopra
I used to love Taylor's on 8th St., for their great old-school atmosphere (leather booths, dark bar), stiff drinks, and eminently edible steaks (not the best, but definitely well-priced compared to Musso's et al.; I always get the Culotte, with the occasional bone-in rib-eye). But after some 8 years of fandom, I may have made my last trip to Taylor's. It's bad enough that the Molly salad is no longer free with the meal; now the meat is sub-par and the service mediocre at best. I went last week with some friends, and not only were all our steaks overdone (a steakhouse should know the difference between medium-rare and medium), they tried to charge us for four extra drinks. It took arguing with four different people to have the erroneous charges removed. And as we noted, the guy at the bar was new and the older female waitresses were nowhere to be seen on this busy weekend night. Adieu Taylor's... we're back on the hunt.
-
re: AliLovesLA
Wow, so sorry about your experience. I love it, too, and have never had such a time there. While I wish the molly salad was free, I still get it every time and love it. And my bill still runs much lower than any steak place in town. I tend to get the filet (I was never a huge fan of the culotte) and the filet always is very good. Sorry it chased you away, though I understand.
-
-
-
-
re: stevenclaire
I Second Maestro's. I went to the BH location 2 weeks ago and had the most amazing bone-in ribeye and bone-in filet (shared by 2 of course) i've ever had. The sides were incredible: tuna tartare and lobster mashed with a spicy ceasar salad.
If you want romantic get a spot on the entrance floor. however if you want some music and a crowd sit in the second.
-
-







