HOME > Chowhound > Pennsylvania >

Discussion

Morimoto minus sushi?

  • 8

Was thinking of hitting up Morimoto for the Omakase. Is it worth it if you aren't a sushi person?

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. depends on what you consider "sushi." (And I'm guessing that there's an official definition, but I do think that the word evokes different meanings from person to person).
    I had the omakase once, quite likely the best meal i've ever had, at least in a restaurant.
    there was only one straight-up sushi course, but there were other courses that involved raw fish. including the first course, the tuna tartare, which was *awesome*.
    they will ask you if there's anything you don't want - when i went, i was with my GF who doesn't eat beef, so there was one course where I had beef and she had fish (cooked, I should note).

    1. The first 4 courses were raw when I had it so if by "not a sushi person" you mean you won't eat raw fish then its a pass.

      1 Reply
      1. re: mddletown

        IMO if you aren't a "sushi person" I don't think the Omakase is worth it. Going a step further I don't think that Morimoto is worth it if you don't eat sushi.

      2. I think that if you go in there and say you want an omakase but don't want sushi that they will be more than happy to accomodate you. What restaurant is going to turn a customer away that's ready to drop $80 to $120?

        1 Reply
        1. re: Philly Ray

          Ray, I'm sure that you are right and that they would definitely accommodate a non-sushi eating customer. The question at hand, however, is whether or not an Omakase worth it if you don't eat sushi, and I think the answer is no.

        2. yea...i dont know...im not into raw fish, thats just me

          1. Actually, if you are really into sushi, Morimoto is not the best place, try Fuji in NJ instead.

            If you are *not* into sushi, then have them sub a few dishes for say the rock shrimp tempura.