<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<topic>
  <id>506874</id>
  <title>North Berkeley Imports?</title>
  <published_at>Mon Apr 07 00:22:34 -0700 2008</published_at>
  <post_count>2</post_count>
  <board>
    <id>34</id>
    <name>Wine</name>
  </board>
  <posts>
    <post>
      <post>
        <level>0</level>
        <id>3568606</id>
        <content>greetings oenophiles, we went to a North Berkeley Import tasting yesterday (highlights for me, the '06 red burgundies from the vineyards one expects to find something to like, an '06 Meursault Genevrieres, and an '05 Chat. Jean Faure St. Emilion). One of their staff gushed about an '06 Cote Rotie that's one of their company's 'cuvee uniques', i.e. put together to their preferences often after barrel tastings. My response was that it seemed to lack a definite 'northern Rhone syrah-based wine' character, granted in my limited experience, recently biased by an excellent bottle of '99 Guigal Hermitage. Seemed like it could pass for a premium Calif. syrah. Of course the usual excuse of the youth of the wine was offered, but to me it wasn't really the qualities I associate with youth (tannin, unruliness), which I found moderate in any case, that I was questioning.

I've read comments on the web that North Berkeley's cuvees in effect take the wines toward the new world or international palate and away from the uniqueness of their original terroirs. Most of the wine I've had from them aren't their cuvees, so I really have no sample to confirm if that's true. What do the experienced palates on this board have to say? Thanks to you all, you've taught me much.</content>
        <published_at>Mon Apr 07 00:22:34 -0700 2008</published_at>
        <parent_id></parent_id>
        <user>
          <id>11012</id>
          <name>moto</name>
        </user>
      </post>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>3568820</id>
      <content>North Berkeley likes new barrels... but then again so does Marcassin?</content>
      <published_at>Mon Apr 07 05:48:34 -0700 2008</published_at>
      <parent_id>3568606</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>181391</id>
        <name>vinechild</name>
      </user>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>3568862</id>
      <content>&gt;&gt;&gt; Of course the usual excuse of the youth of the wine was offered &lt;&lt;&lt;

For years, the "knock" on NBI was that their wines were too oaky.  I have yet to find a mature Burgundy that comes off that way, and I am not a big fan of oak (i.e.: I am sensitive to its over-use).  

That said, let me add I'm not the biggest fan of their Rh&#244;nes, but I do not think they are "internationalist" or "New World" in style, and -- yes - the oak DOEs show more in the wine's youth.

Cheers,
Jason</content>
      <published_at>Mon Apr 07 06:09:48 -0700 2008</published_at>
      <parent_id>3568606</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>28122</id>
        <name>zin1953</name>
      </user>
    </post>
  </posts>
</topic>
