Las Vegas Dining Dilemma
I am heading to Las Vegas at the end of the month with my brother and father and I am having trouble deciding on the diner reservation for our first night. Currently, the line up is as follows:
1. Carnevino or Guy Savoy
On my previous trip to LV for two nights, I ate at B&B Ristorante and L'Atelier. Although I did not encounter the same oversalting issue that is apparent in many of the other posts about B&B, I thought the food was good but not great. I live in the Bay Area and consider the pasta dishes served by Michael Tusk at Quince superior to the offerings at B&B. While each dish was very appealing conceptually, the execution lacked a certain discipline and care that one would expect from a restaurant of this caliber. The wine list was very interesting (although marked up a bit high in my opinion) and the atmosphere was a welcome respite for the hustle and bustle of the casino. Based on this experience and the few posts regarding Carnevino, my concern is that the same execution issues exist at Carnevino. When you couple this issue with the prices that they are charging, I am not sure this is a good bet.
As for Guy Savoy, Frank Bruni's recent review in the New York Times as well as several posts on this site as well as other blogs have made me reconsider this option as well. Since I will be dining at Alex the following night, I would need more persuading that the experience at Guy Savoy is so different and worthwhile that the price tag is justified. As someone you had the good fortune to experience a 21 course diner at the French Laundry recently (I went with a regular), the $290 price tag at Guy Savoy is troubling given the feedback. Since I was introduced to Robuchon's cooking ar L'Atelier last time (he was there that night and had a chance to speak with him in broken French (his English is not so good and generally has one of his staff with him when he walks around to interpret customer's comments), I want to try something new and would prefer to save a meal at the Mansion for a trip with my wife.
Alas, this is my problem: I wanted to structure the meals so that we had a different dining experience each night: steak (Carnevino), tasting (Alex), seafood (Bartolotta). Although Guy Savoy would have put two tastings on the list, I don"t think I have seen enough evidence that it is worth the trip. Other possibilities I have considered are Cut, Louis's (although the whole mall idea bothers me) and Restaurant Charlie (yes, I know that would make two seafood choices). Rosemary's is not a possibility and Lotus of Siam would not fly with my father. If anyone has any insights that could help me resolve this dilemma, I would greatly appreciate it.
loved alex and bartolotta. haven't been to the other two. what about l'atelier? it certainly would be different from alex and bartolotta.
Like you, I had a very similar experience at the French Laundry and it is the gold standard for any meal I will ever have again.
With that being said - Guy Savoy was the 2nd best meal I've ever had. I do have to say that we were completely styled out since me and my buddy are friends with the then-executive-chef of GS. So my experience there will unlikely be like anyone else's but it still was some of the best food I've ever tasted. My only complaint is that the room seems cold and sterile at first. I warmed up to it in the 3 1/2 hours that followed but it was slightly uncomfortable at first. Personally, I would choose GS over anything else in Vegas if I had the money to spend because that type of dining experience is what I like more than anything else.
I've never dined at Carnevino but if you want to do steak, let me make two other suggestions for you. Craftsteak at the MGM is my hands down all around favorite restaurant in the city. Their foie gras is AMAZING and the beef is always top notch. I could eat there 4 times a week and never get tired of it. Also think about Stripsteak at Mandalay Bay. Another great choice of steakhouse with an upbeat atmosphere and some killer food. Both places are really good and each have their own uniqueness to them that I've always said steakhouses need in order to separate themselves from one another.
Thanks for your thoughts. Your comment regarding Guy Savoy raises an interesting issue that I have found with many high end restaurants: frequent guests or those with a contact at the restaurant have a very different dining experience than many first time visitors. Although this makes perfect business sense, it can be rather frustrating for a first time visitor to a restaurant such as Guy Savoy or the French Laundry where they are spending serious money. While I was on the receiving end of the generosity at the French Laundry (that was a six hour meal), I have also experienced the jealousy of watching as a six course tasting menu is turned into a sixteen course meal for an adjoining table. It is a fine line the high end establishments have to navigate to maintain loyalty while not alienating first time visitors who may become regulars.
As for steak, the reason Carnevino is on the list is Adam Perry Lang. The guy is a zealot when it comes to beef. Unfortunately, prior to Carnevino, his steaks were served in Robert's, a steak restaurant in the Penthouse Club in NYC; not exactly where I want to spend an evening. Again, I love the menu conceptually but it seems that they have not executed on that concept. I don"t know the executive chef but he is now in charge of three restaurants, including two high end places. It is one thing to have name chef's like Batali associated with multiple ventures but does it make sense for the guy actually in charge of the kitchen?
Now this is a great thread!
I've been to Alex, Bartolotta but not Guy Savoy (yet).
Alex has become my gold standard the way you speak of French Laundry(another place I have not been yet). Their tasting menu really is amazing and has not disappointed in 3 trips. In fact, they seem to get better each time. On my trips to Vegas (usually 4/year) I have to force myself to not go to Alex in order to try different spots.
Bartolotta is up there with both the best seafood and Italian restaurants for me. I would highly recommend the family style tasting menu. I was a bit skeptical of it being that the name implied gluttony. I tend to seek out tasting menus like Alex with multiple small portions rather than places most folks consider great values. That said, I've never left a tasting menu hungary. The family style tasting gave small samples of multiple different aspects in which the chef obviously excels. They served an amazing array of different and exotic seafoods impeccably prepared. The whole fish was served as well which was also quite an experience. Most threads on this and other sites focus on the whole fish which was great but would pale in comparison by itself to the tasting. The tasting is spendy, but that does not seem to be an issue for you based on your itinerary.
I am most excited to try Guy Savoy. Hopefully on my upcoming trip in June it will work out. I was not aware of the bad press you brought up, but enough folks whom I trust (real and virtual) have raved about the food, service, ambiance, wine and overall experience. When dining at places like Guy Savoy I typically don't think of value in my decision to dine there. There are many more practical things to do with the $1500 it will cost my wife and I to do the Prestige Menu with the wines that do it justice. Fine dining experiences like Alex, Kai, Bartolotta and hopefully Guy Savoy enrich my life to where the cash laydown seems inconsequential. Just my take.
That said, I don't think I would choose to do 2 major meals like Alex and Guy Savoy in the same trip. I like to save the high end places for future trips.
I can't remember who said it on this site, but Picasso at one time was the class of Vegas but has been pushed a bit back into the pack by places like Alex, Joel R. and Guy S. From my Vegas experience, Picasso was top-notch but still not up to the experience I had at Alex. If you enjoy the Bellagio fountains though, Picasso is your spot. Their foie gras was among the best I've had anywhere.
I think that Picasso is too similar to Alex to warrant its inclusion. Although Alex is mentioned in the same group as the Mansion and Guy Savoy, I think they take different approaches to fine dining. Robuchon and Savoy use innovative dishes to demonstrate their mastery of technique, refining disparate elements into a cohesive whole. I think that Alex takes a more straightforward approach, using more identifiable combinations but ensuring that the chef's mastery of technique is expressed by coxing the most out of each element. If Stratta has a french counterpart, it is Ducasse. One thing I wonder is whether the prices at the Mansion and Guy Savoy reflect both restaurants over reliance on French sources for their ingredients. The U.S. presents a bounty of artisnal products that neither chef seems to embrace. When I hear that they import even the most basic elements such as butter, I shudder. Do they not know of such great American producers as Animal Farm and Adante dairy? I would be more impressed by both chefs if their U.S. restaurants embraced local providers and demonstrated that such sources can still provide a compelling experience, if not greater.
As for Picasso, I think it is too similar in style to Alex to warrant inclusion. I appreciate the recommendation but please keep them coming.
This will be a long musing so please forgive me if you think it is irrelevant or long winded. I was curious about Carnevino as I have not heard of it before. And before you read on I am not writing to review Carnevino as I have never been. I originate from the NYC metro area and have always been passionate about food and wine. I visit Vegas approx. 4 times a year and am a regular reader and occasional poster. Prior to 2 years ago I had been very down on Babbo for a several dinners there that were, IMHO, below the standard for which the restaurant was being held. However after not being for several years I had to give it another shot and I was changed. It is a great experience and I consider a top destination. I have been to B&B twice in Vegas and I will have to say that I will not go back for several years (if it indeed makes it that long) because I think it is a far cry from Babbo and will take a while to work out its issues.
I believe the team of Bastianich/Batali is quite the empire. They are marketing gurus that have far exceeded even the most optimistic in terms of success. And this quite evident at Carnevino. Again, I HAVE NEVER BEEN. But I have to question a couple of glaring points. 1st the prices. HOLY GOOD GOD!!! Pasta dishes fetching $40!!! Fried Calamari $23 for an appetizer. Then we get down to the "BBL" beef. "BBL beef is often beyond regular USDA prime standards for marbling and flavor and is hormone and antibiotic free." Then they go on to tell you the rub it with sea salt , black pepper and rosemary...big deal! And so what if you don’t want those things? Ok so maybe I am wrong. Maybe they let you ask for it to be rubbed your way. $150 for a bone in rib eye and $175 for porterhouse. I will tell you what...that rubs me the wrong way.
C'mon folks. I know this is Vegas. I know you spend more just to eat in places. But when is enough enough? Would I spend this type of money in a restaurant? Absolutely. Would I spend this type of money on a steak? Not a chance. Even at the highest end retail place I can think of in NYC the price of beef has not gone above $30 a pound (and NO I do not buy it. Just using as a reference.) And that is for Prime (real USDA prime I may add) dry aged (for a min of 21 days) grass fed beef. Maybe because the USD$ has gotten so weak and places like the Palazzo cater exclusively to Europeans who are not shocked by prices like this. But at some point there will/should be a backlash against prices as egregious as these.
If people are willing to pay the money then why shouldn't restaurants offer steaks for astronomical prices. Vegas is full of those situations. $500 drinks, $100 burgers, $175 steaks. People are buying them and if they don't these "bargains" will likely fall off the menu. People are more likely to pull the triggor while in Vegas and rationalize these seemingly frivolous purchases.
Your rant is confusing to me. Most folks who complain of prices are the "value" types who want to have large plates of food and pay very little for it. They are unable to appreciate that perhaps multiple small courses of immaculately prepared food can be an amazing experience that will leave you satisfied. They relate to the TV commercials equating fine dining to eating "elf" food. When the check arrives they are in utter disbelief at the "gaul" of someone to charge so much for so little food. Then they will likely throw in the obligitory comment of how they headed straight for the golden arches to pack down a big mac and large fries to fill up.
From reading your posts, the previous paragraph does not describe you. It seems like people experienced in fine dining will know what is worth spending their money on and what are the gimmicks to avoid. I must admit that I've fallen for some of those gimmicks like the $80 burger at the burger bar with foie gras, truffles and short ribs. Was very good but won't do it again. I probably won't bite on the Carnevino porterhouse, but I may go for the $120 tasting of different New York steaks at Cut (Nebraska, American Wagyu, Japanese Kobe).
I tend not to take rants about Vegas prices real seriously because usually I do not relate to the reasons for the rant. Yours is different however and I continue to be confused by it. Why not just avoid the place and go elsewhere where you won't feel ripped off? The choices in Vegas are endless.
I think the pricing at Carnevino has triggered a wave of of frustration and I think that the opinion of LVI on such matter has some merit. We can all agree that Las Vegas has moved beyond a gambling destination and can now lay claim to being a full service entertainment mecca where many people venture who will never set fut in the casino unless it is on the way to a show or restaurant.
For many visitors, including myself, choosing among the wide variety of restaurants is one of the most enjoyable parts of my trip. Unlike the old days where large buffets were subsidized by the casino to bring in more gamblers, the new restaurants are also profit centers that can exist on their own and have their own customer base. Moreover. I have come to accept that such fine dining establishments will charge a premium for the experience since they will have to rely on a higher cost of goods in Las Vegas (e.g., see my previous comment regarding the Mansion and Guy savoy and their reliance on French ingredients). Nevertheless, I think the pricing at Carnevino has gone beyond economics and is simply testing how big of a profit margin they can get their customers to swallow. Since opening, the porterhouse for two has been reduced from $160 to $140; unfortunately, the rest of the menu has not followed.
As climberdoc mentioned, Las Vegas is the land of $500 drinks and $100 burgers but these are usually novelties on an otherwise appropriately priced menu (e.g., see Boloud's menu as an example). The problem for Carnevino is that it has applied the novelty concept to the whole menu. For places such as Guy Savoy and the Mansion, they are serving a small number of diners a very complex menu and utilizing a large number of employees. The cost of such an experience is going to be high and it is hard for diners to say that they can go to many other similar restaurants and get a similar experience for a better price. On the other hand, you don't have to leave the Palazzo to find a reference for Carnevino: Cut. Cut is not cheap and its steaks are not "choice" yet looks at its menu. Prices on everything from appetizers to main courses are significantly lower (and as any person will tell you, pasta dishes have one of the lowest cost of goods around). The leads me to the question: What is Carnevino offering that will make me choose it over Cut (or Craftsteak, SW Steakhouse, Prime, etc.)? To date, I have not found a reason. Maybe if BBL beef is hand massaged by Mario using red wine from his Italian Wine Merchants, it is worth a try at those prices (this coming from someone who was almost willing to bite at the current prices).
In the end, the prices at Carnevino made me feel like I would be playing a part in a bet between Mario and Joe. It is one thing to charge high prices, it is another when people realize that the emperor has no clothes.
Stuckinsillyvalley. If there was an award for Chowhound of the Year, I would nominate you. Your posts are articulate and educated (imagine that).
In my opinion, Vegas has morphed once again and now it's definitely for the better. To me it is a dining destination and I consider myself fortunate to live within driving distance of so many great dining venues. I don't smoke or gamble and I avoid buffets like the plague. I don't find that an issue in the latest version of Vegas. In fact, I look forward to each trip with great anticipation. It's a place where I can indulge many of my passions, those being eating fine food, drinking fine wine, staying in fancy rooms, all in the company of my beautiful wife.
If a by-product of the "new" Vegas is emergence of novelties like those that have been mentioned, I think I will accept it. The educated diner should have the experience and knowledge to tease out the fluff from what is really worthwhile. If every so often I get stung by an $80 burger, that's okay. It only serves to make me a more educated and experienced diner.
stuckinsillyvalley you have made some excellent points. Trying to compare a dinner @ Guy Savoy or the Maison to one @ Carnevino is almost comical. There are some chefs that are way too obsessive about ingredients or how certain dishes are made. One example I can make is Charlie Trotter. People may bemoan his often overly obsessive compulsive kitchen practices (i.e. making an 8oz red wine reduction from 40 bottles of good Bordeaux) but you can justify the expense. Is it over the top? Sure. But after tasting 1 drop of that reduction will make you appreciate, not necessarily justify, his obsession. And the other point stuckinsillyvalley makes is about the reliance on French ingredients. If you want to argue the merits of such a practice that is understandable. However it helps justify the prices they charge. Not to mention kitchen/wait staff at Guy Savoy. For anyone who has been to GS, the wait staff is one of the most professional and numerous I have ever seen. And the kitchen...WOW! Is it necessary? It all depends. But it can be quantified. These expenses all add up. And in turn the consumer is the one who pays for it. But it all adds to the experience.
Carnevino is serving a steak. Plain and simple. (And as they proudly display on the menu, they serve "BBL" beef. I may be wrong by saying this but I would guess they are saving themselves a pretty penny by not buying USDA Prime beef.) Are there 20 classically trained French chefs in the kitchen preparing dozens of complicated dishes? Has the dining room been decorated by a world renowned designer while no expense was spared? (I personally think the amount of money that was spent on the GS dining room was preposterous given its almost stark appeal. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder though.)
My whole point is that places like Carnevino seem to be taking the "let's see how much we can gouge the Las Vegas crowd" to a new extreme. Do you think locals will frequent this establishment? Not a chance (at least not the ones I know.) I will continue to dine at places like Lotus of Siam for its truly magnificent Thai cuisine. Picasso for its combination of food and atmosphere. Tableau for its over the top breakfasts like the braised Kobe beef short ribs atop an impossibly crisp potato pancake topped by a poached egg and béarnaise sauce. In-n-Out burger, Rosemary's...the list will go on. I have my definitions of good food, weather it be a Hot Dog from Rawleys in Fairfield CT, pizza from Pepe's, or the triple decker corned beef/tongue/pastrami sandwich from the Broadway Deli in Santa Monica. But what I will not pay for is a $175 (...oops now marked down to $160 because the price of beef has fallen ;-) ) steak. I hope that is not too confusing!
Just had dinner at Bartolotta this weekend. Nice table outside and hostesses were very friendly switching us to a table outside. The private room was not what we wanted.
Food good. However, service was mixed. Our waiter seemed to have attitude, or at the very least, was not friendly. Our wine came late as well as an order of fish-- so two of us received our entrees about 15 minutes later than our party. Our waiter apologized but service was not "great." They did nicely bring us a bottle of dessert wine which was enjoyed.
Very good topic and very interesting remark everyone if you want enjoy GS for less pricy menu go in bar and ask for the degustation menu they serve the best speciality of GS on small version .
Gold standard for me still Joel Robuchon Restaurant compare to french laundry but is a question of different taste they very not far between them .
My first post here.
A little personal history. I now live in the Las Vegas area but have lived throughout the US. I eat out regularly (5-7 nights a week) at all ranges of restaurants and have eaten my way through Europe and Asia. I am single and usually go places with books (often in electronic form). I read between courses and just eat when the food merits my attention.
I went to Carnevino last night on a whim. It was very disappointing and certainly not worth the expense. I could have done better elsewhere. (One of my goals is to make it through all the steak restaurants at all the major hotels in Las Vegas.)
I arrived early (5:10) and was offered seating at the bar. When I indicated that I preferred a table, I was told to come back after 5:30. So, I took a walk through the casino area for a while and got back at 5:35.
I was seated next to the bar at a table next to the casino. There was no wall, no window, only a low balustrade. So, it was noisy and no different from sitting somewhere in the middle of the casino, or at the bar, for that matter. Please bear in mind that I was the second table seated and when I left at the end of the meal, each of the dining areas was less than half-full. There was - in my opinion - only one less desirable table and that was filled by another singleton about 15 minutes after I was seated.
They served an amuse-bouche of a small ball of fried cheese that was tasty. It was nice and crispy on the outside and soft and hot on the inside. It was excellent. The server muttered rapidly what it was made of, so I don't really know. The foccacio bread was excellent, though the butter was a standard, bland, and relatively tasteless butter. (They also had some sort of whitish spread that I did not care for. Again, the server muttered and I had no idea what he said, so I don't know what it was.)
I ordered the small order of "Black Fetuccini" with "Crab, Jalapenos, and Shallots." The presentation was about 2.5" in what looked to be a 14" plate. So it looked small. The pasta was two (maybe three) small bites worth. The flavor was very pleasant and enjoyable. Unfortunately, the linguini was soft, soggy, and had no consistency. There was no "bite" to the dish that I would expected from jalapenos. There were a lot of shallots that were cooked to a very mushy consistency. There were three bites of crabmeat (looked as if they were from crab legs). Each bite was tasty and had a nice clean crustacean taste. Unfortunately, the consistency was soft and mealy. A definite disappointment for over $20 as an appetizer.
I ordered the NY steak, rare. The waiter asked me if I wanted something to go with the steak and I ordered a sauteed spinach with hot peppers. I also asked for porcini bernaise.
The steak was a plain NY strip on the bone. It was cooked a little more than I like, but close enough that I didn't send this $57 steak back. The flavor of the beef was ordinary. Supposedly, it was rubbed with sea salt, pepper, and rosemary. Did not see any evidence of this and did not taste any evidence of this. There was supposed to be a charred crust. There might have been some on the bone, but no where else. Basically, it was a plain steak that is not in the top-10 category for steaks in Las Vegas. The spinach was cool-to-cold, greasy, and soggy. However, it did have a nice flavor bite with the hot peppers. The bernaise was delivered almost at the end of the meal (and it was "on" the waiter). It was cold and tasted like salty yellow goo with mushrooms in it. But it did enhance the flavor of the beef so I ate it all. (The beef was so ordinary that I was tempted to ask for salt.)
I decided on the panna cotta for dessert. It was rich and flavorful consisting of three layers. That was the best part of the meal - by far. The accompanying two thin slices of biscotti was utterly devoid of taste.
The espresso tasted like diluted regular coffee. It didn't have the bite of good Italian espresso or the more rounded tastes of French espresso. It was served with a choice of sweeteners (raw sugar on a stick - which I used, white sugar cubes, and colored bags of artificial sweetener) placed just out of reach.
I ordered a bottle of sparkling water. It was a pleasant water with a combination of tight and large bubbles. Again, I found it to be just ordinary, maybe a bit better than the more commonly available San Pellegrino or Perrier. The bottle was put at the other end of the table with the label turned away, so I really couldn't see what it was.
They have an extensive wine list, but I didn't indulge.
The waiter was okay, but disappeared for long periods of time. He put out the cutlery for each course separately and with some panache. I put my electronic book on the left and they served me from the right side (a nice touch). There were two people who acted more like cafeteria busboys than backservers. The only really weak service element (besides forgetting my sauce) was that at a two-top next to me, the gentleman got up to go somewhere (restroom?) and they brought out a salad for two while he was away and did not assist the couple with the salad after he returned 5-10 minutes after the salad was sitting at their table.
One interesting thing was that during much of the meal, a captain went to all the tables near me and pulled out chairs and looked under the table. He would then look at the tablecloth and on some tables he would flip up the table cloth over the table settings. At those tables, a "busboy" would come by, remove the table settings, change the table cloth, and put the table settings back. Maybe that is a normal check, but since I was one of the first at a first sitting, wouldn't that have been done beforehand?
As you might have guessed, I read through this meal. It was ordinary in quality, but extraordinary in price. The total bill (including 20% gratuity) was about $130.So, it was a "been there, done that, don't need to do it again."
Considering your goal of eating thru all the steak restaurants in Vegas I would love a bit of advice. I need to fill in a dinner on my upcoming trip with a steak dinner. I don't necessarily need the classic old school kind of place. We are staying at the Wynn, so I was considering SW, but I've seen mixed reviews. I've been to Craftsteak already... What’s been your favorites?
Been off this site for a while. Elsewhere, I had posted my list of top steak restaurants (to my taste). I am going to make a change to that.
Just got back from dinner at the new Wolfgang Puck restaurant in town, Cut, at the Palazzo. It was typical Vegas pricey, but it was excellent, making it into my top five steakhouses in Vegas. My new listing is:
5. Vic & Anthony's
6. Capital Grill
7. Del Frisco
9. Mesa Grill
The former, but no longer, top 10 restaurant was SW Steakhouse.
This is my experience tonight at Cut. This is the Thursday of Memorial Day weekend. Apparently, this weekend is considered one of the top weekends in Vegas this year.
When I got to the Palazzo Hotel (self-parked in their most convenient parking lot) and got to Cut at about 7:30 PM. The restaurant was apparently full for the evening and they asked if I wanted to be seated in the bar area where I could get a full menu. Being a singleton, I chose a seat at the bar - not a wise choice because short, dumpy me did not have the long, elegant legs for which those bar stools were designed. So, it ended up being quite uncomfortable by the end of the meal. Likewise, it was pretty dark, so it was difficult trying to read my book (wish the Kindle was backlit).
I ordered a bottle of sparkline water (Voss) and a glass of Spanish wine, which was quite good. They had an extensive wine list, but I didn't spend a whole lot of time going through it.
There were a variety of starters, all of which were interesting. I selected Maple Glazed Pork Belly that came with a small salad (some form of parsley?). It looks like the pork belly is a standard starter that they combine with different fresh vegetables depending on the evening. Since my doctor tells me I must eat vegetables, I did and they were typical vegetables with dressing. But, the combination with the pork belly was excellent. The pork was warm with enough fat that it was decadent (but not a greasy gooey fat, more of a firm, chewy fat). The contrasts in texture and tastes was very good.
They offer a choice of USDA Prime Illinois corn fed beef (aged 21 days), USDA Prime Nebraska corn fed beef (aged 35 days), American Wagyu, and Japanese Waygu. One fanciful dish is a "Tasing of New York Sirloin" (combination of Nebraska, American Waygu, and Japanese Waygu).
I chose Nebraska New York Sirloin (not a political statement), Bernaise sauce, and sauteed spinach. The steak came out perfect (ordered black and blue). The thing I hate most about many restaurants is that the steak feels cool to cold on the palate. Rare does not imply cold, that simply means that it hasn't been brought to a reasonable temperature before cooking (personal opinion). But, this was a perfectly cooked black-and-blue and not cold. It had a crusting of salt and pepper. The salt had enough of a bite to it that it was some form of sea salt, but I don't have a good enough palate to distinguish the type of sea salt. The pepper was relatively light. The Bernaise sauce was perfectly prepared. And the spinach was nice and warm, slightly crunchy, but fully cooked. To my tastes, just perfect.
There were also a variety of excellent sounding desserts and I asked the bartender to choose between two. She suggested a third - banana cream pie. It came with a shell with the texture and taste of filo. It was truly excellent - and I am not fond of bananas. However, I still think that I would have preferred the Vanilla Baked Alaska - that sounds just so old fashioned that it appealed to me!
The young lady who was the bartender at my end of the bar was very pleasant, very pretty, and very new. She tried hard, but service was a little lacking. I was not offered and did not get any bread (which actually is a good thing as I pretend to control carbs). I was also not offered coffee, tea, or other after dinner drinks.
All-in-all, a very credible restaurant. IMHO, it is the best of the Wolfgang Puck restaurants in town. Usually I dread the idea of going to "yet another Wolfgang Puck" restaurant, but for this one, I will make an exception and go back.
I have been to Craftsteak at MGM twice. The service was rushed (both times, the meal with appetizer/salad and steak were done in under an hour from the time we sat down), the place loud and noisy, and the food good, but did not have anything that would make me want to take notice.
Other friends have had great experiences there, but my two experiences didn't quite do it.
The first time I was at Craftsteak, I ordered a "black-and-blue" NY Strip and the steak came out with a light tan surface and cold (not cool) center (it came back out medium rare). The second time, I asked for very rare, but not cold, and it came out medium (sent back and it came out medium rare, which I then ate because the rest of my party was done). The quality of the meat was very good but had a more bland taste and less chewy (fiber-y) texture than I find in the other NY steaks that I like.
I would highly recommend the Fleur De Lys in he Mandalay Bay for their tasting menu. I am a local and enjoy the tasting menus and this would be my top choice. The service was impeccable and the food was excellent. They also have a fabulous wine selection.
If you enjoy foie gras, then visit Bouchon at the Venetian.
If you want steak, the Nine at the Palm serves an excellent Kobe beef, however the ambiance is a bit loud. The Palm at Caesars has one of the best cuts of beef as well.
re: Sandra Lambert
It's worth mentioning that the foie gras at Bouchon is torchon-style. That really doesn't appeal to a lot of peeps. Personally, I think it's fantastic as well but when I hear the words "foie gras" I immediately think of it seared and served savory but with a sweet component, namely some sort of cooked fruit ( compote, sauce, etc. ). See Craftsteak for the perfect example of seared foie gras.