why isn't Good ever any good?
this is a great spot, good beers although a bit overpriced, but the food is just gross. it's no better than denny's. i keep wanting to like it because it's close, and who doesn't like having a beer on the patio with your dog? but the only thing that's edible is the onion rings, and i suspect those are from sysco.
Some posters on the board call this the Silver Lake restaurant curse, although I suspect every neighborhood has spots like this that seemingly last forever with the most boring possible food. It somehow fills a niche for people who want to smoke or bring their dog, and when it comes down to it, there's a large percentage of people who don't really care that much about what they eat as long as the place is convenient.
You could ask the same question about Casita del Campo, Rudolpho's, Fritzie's, El Conquistador, Home, etc. They all need a visit from Gordon Ramsay.
I agree. I visited a few Sundays ago and everything my friends and I shared was dull, tasteless and the service was so so.
I had a pretty good breakfast there when the place first opened but it was expensive.
I am surprised the place has lasted as long as it has!
I presume it is because the emphasis is on the beer and not the food. It is the same problem at Lucky Baldwin's in Pasadena. Maybe they don't know why people want food when you can drink a Belgian Triple and get the nutritional equivalent of a meal?
I also think that the decor is a good reflection of the food. Feels like it doesn't know what it is, dining establishment or beer hall, and the result is poor food and a strange ambiance saved by the grace of a cold beer.
The original comment has been removed