Bourdain in London
Ok, I'm watching "No Reservations" in London and I'm frustrated. I'm enjoying the show foodwise, it all looks good and the Marco Pierre White segment was very interesting. But the show would have been well served by utilizing english sub-titles. I could not understand most of what was being said, between the din of the background noise and the heavy cockney accents, very frustrating. I would think when reviewing the show during editing, someone would have picked up on this. But perhaps it's just me? Bloody 'ell!!
-
While the "chippie" is very much a standard in almost any British town, the show did the Scottish palate a great disservice by shooting at one instead of exploring some of the more unique and substantive meals/delicacies that are common there. An inquisitive segment on haggis (not the deep-fried variety!), blood pudding, etc. would have been far more interesting to watch...
Edinburgh is a great city rich with historical, architectural, and possibly even culinary significance. It's too bad this part of the show felt so rushed, like it was done on the fly as an afterthought to a show on London...
›1 Reply-
re: Jaxie Waxie Woo
Jaxie, I have to agree, it did seemed a bit tacked on. I think it was more a result of wanting to hang out with buddy Ian Rankin and showcase Tom Kitchin rather than evaluate the whole of Edinburgh. That said, would there have been much to seeing TB munch on Haggis, etc and go "yum"? I think the show functions first and foremost as entertainment. Unique and informative at best, but still entertainment.
I DO think that the Edinburgh segment showed that there was a renaissance starting there as well as London and that it dealt with using the local ingredients and traditions in a very attentive and inventive manner. In THAT, it was very thematically tied to the rest of the show.
-
-
Hi everyone, just watched this and have a stupid question. When they were in Scotland and showed shots of Kitchin's kitchen, there were two shots of this weird looking seafood, obviously still alive, and neither me nor mr. rockandroller could identify what it could possibly be. Not so surprising since I am not a big seafood eater, but mr. has worked in a lot of kitchens and he's never seen it either.
All I can tell you is it was a tied up bundle of what looked like about 20 long, gray, thin legs with white wiggly parts sticking out about 2 inches off of the end of the legs. Can someone tell me what this was?
›3 Replies-
-
re: mnosyne
I'm pretty sure that's what she's taking about.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:En...
DT
-
-
-
I undertstood everyone except the Fergus guy, and I'm convinced that that's because he wasn't actually speaking English -- or any other language. He'd twinkle behind those thick glasses and smile impishly and bather something about birds flying overhead. I think he's bonkers. (Not that I'm bashing him, I'm sure he's very talented.)
I have to say that I'm getting tired of the offal and dead deer and the pigs' heads. Meat comes from animals. I get it.
›3 Replies-
-
-
re: Glencora
Glencora, I wouldn't feel too bad, you didn't know and Henderson is speaking very softly with a pretty solid accent. As for his personality, I think that playful eccentricity that everyone seems to enjoy about him (he is universally liked) is probably more of what you saw rather than the Parkinson's. Yes, he IS bonkers, but in that marvelous way that any really fun genius gets to be!
-
-
-
-
Most of the NR shows have at least one segment where Tony is eating in someone's home. It usually involves an older generation cook preparing time-tested dishes from the past. 99% of the time, these seem to be his favorite food experiences of the episode. London/Scotland did not have any of this.
I would love to ask Tony why that was. Are there no British staple dishes, handed down over centuries, that are worthy of a home cooked dinner segment? Or, do the Brits only do take-out?
›1 Reply -
-
Remember, England and the US are two nations separated by a common language.
I turned the subtitles (closed captioning) on as too much Jefferson Airplane, Rolling Stones, Grateful Dead and 20 years of classroom teaching have taken a toll on my hearing - and I find that my wife (who's hearing is fine) likes them too.
-
Hate to be the dissenting vote, but...No one has enjoyed watching Tony Bourdain as much as I have from the beginning, but - if I have to see him kill one more animal or watch endless footage of pig's heads and other pre-butchered meat in the name of manliness and authenticity, I'm going to stop watching! Am I the only one who finds this upsetting? Yes, I know that the meat I eat looks like that before it's cut up, but I really don't want to see it! I'm trying to exist in a state of denial here...
›7 Replies-
-
-
re: The Librarian
I grew up in Europe and seeing half a pig or cow in the corner butchers shop was everyday, even today if you went to a market you'd see poultry with had and feet intact, and quite possibly pig heads too. The term "manliness and authenticity" makes about as much sense as "meatless meat". No, it's not a ploy to shock you, they are simply showing thing the way they are, instead of censoring it for the squeamish.
-
-
-
Wow, Really? I thought it was one of the best episodes ever. Focus on Food not travel. Not a bunch of wasted film on drinking and smoking. I thought they did a great job on focusing on traditional food. Great chef profiles. Fresh venison. Overall I thought it was an excellent show.
›3 Replies-
re: Docsknotinn
>>Not a bunch of wasted film on drinking and smoking. <<
I personally thought the whole rock n roll/poetry recording stuff was a waste of time. For me the "artier" they try and get, the less I like the show. The multiple screens, the scripted episodes like Tuscany, all "not my cup of offal".
Susan
-













