Tired, Warm And Nondescript: A Birthday Dinner At Charlie Palmer Steak
- Joe H Dec 17, 2007 06:07 PM
Thirty minutes ago we returned home with over a pound and a half of nearly raw, gristled glistening beef which was left over from our dinner at Charlie Palmer Steak tonight. Dense woods back to our house in Reston with hungry squirrels, fox, deer, raccoons and the occasional emaciated turkey vulture looking for his or her next meal.
Tomorrow they will be fat. Or, at least I think, happy. I threw the entire plastic container as far as I could from our deck, deep into the woods, not wanting it to despoil our temperamental garbage disposal. The $84.00 porterhouse steak had been sadly, grossly undercooked. Looking at it in our kitchen I thought it was worthy of George A. Romero ending a fast or, at the least, a hundred or so of his famished zombies looking for their next meal. Frankly, my wife and I agreed: cannibalism would never have existed on Earth if this was all that was available for dinner.
Our birthday celebration could have been a bit tastier than it was.
Charlie Palmer operates one of the better restaurants in New York, Aureole. Several years ago he opened an outpost here at the base of Capital Hill catering to lobbyists and industrialists hoping to impress their clients. A luncheon visit several weeks after opening was promising: at the time I thought we were fortunate to have a talented chef think enough of us to open his first national outpost here.
Tonight I returned for the first time since his opening, perhaps three or more years later.
His restaurant was not what I remembered.
Walking in the door there is a nondescript bar that, for me, felt like it was adjacent to the coat room at the old American Legion hall off Sligo avenue in Silver Spring. There was nothing remarkable about it. Just nothing at all. It was, well, plain. Nondescript. Vanilla. Certainly not the manly, clubby arrived-at ambience of a Capital Grille. Not the faux leopard print/chrome/black leather and vinyl upscale tacky ambience of the mature adventurer's Prime Rib nor the stately oak and brass, caricatures whose personality spill over the walls of the Palm. This was a plain bar with dull colors which invited carrying one's drink quickly into the dining room beyond.
The dining room ambience wasn't THAT bad. It just wasn't that special either. Still, what this report is about is the food. Which, for $275 (including tax and tip) just wasn't that good. And we didn't even have dessert and our wine, an '04 L'Ecole 41 Merlot was about $60. Frankly, in retrospect, it's remarkable that meal of this presentation could have cost this much.
But I need to explain.
We had two appetizers: a very good butternut squash soup with creme fraiche. It was delicious. Flavorful, complex, a real credit to the kitchen. I had shrimp (well, some kind of thawed, mealy, head on crustacean-a prawn if you will) that topped a flavorful green risotto which had been baked and dotted with an emulsion that I, honestly, can't remember. (We did not take a menu with us nor does the on line menu describe this dish.) The flavor was excellent; in fact the potential was there for an outstanding dish. It's just that the prawn was mealy and the risotto had been baked, boiled and/or left to stand in a pot for an excessive time on a stove somewhere. What I was served was simply tired: this really could have been a signature app. But it wasn't. Somewhere in prepping for the evening's dinner freshness was overlooked, a theme that was to be repeated a number of times over our next courses.
We ordered a three inch thick Porterhouse to share. It was brought to our table in a cast iron skillet, a nice presentation before being taken back to the kitchen for carving. When it returned, on two eleven inch porcelain platters, we saw how frighteningly undercooked our medium rare beef was. The problem is that it had been sliced into quarter and half inch thick slabs. Both of us are veterans of Pittsburgh black and blue and we thought we could survive this with the interesting addition of an array of mustards which accompanied the nearly raw meat.
Sides included a goat cheese variation of mac and cheese along with "truffled twice baked potatoes" ($14! for one split in half.) and creamed spinach which incorporated light cream rather than whipping cream. The mac and goat cheese was OK, the twice baked truffled potatoes were warm. Well, ok, when I really hammered the fork into them the center was room temperature. At best. And the creamed spinach made me feel proud. Of what I cook for Christmas dinner every year which involves cooking down a couple pounds of spinach, nutmeg, Lewes Dairy heavy cream, etc. In fact I think any home cook could take a date or spouse or partner to Charlie Palmer's and leave feeling quite confidant in the next meal they will prepare at home.
It couldn't be much worse.
On a positive note the service was exemplery. Our waiter who hailed from Houston and knew Pappas Bros. Steak Houses couldn't have been a better representative. If only Pappas Bros. would open an outpost in the one hundred block of Constitution!
We skipped dinner and stopped at a Harris Teeter in Ballston where I bought a cheap, half frozen birthday cake. I sliced it apportioning all of the icing for us and a bit of the cake for texture. The dry, dark chocolate cake left over joined the gristled beef which the turkey vultures will have for dessert tomorrow in the woods behind our house.
This could have been a very good meal. But it was not. I feel that I threw away $275 for several courses that I would have been embarassed to serve in my home. Someone needs to tell Charlie Palmer that now that he has ten or more restaurants spread around the country he needs to climb on a plane and visit several of them: especially the one here. His recipes are intact; the preparation for us tonight was just awful.
Because of my business I typically take my vacation in December or January. In past years, when in town, we've gone to Maestro, the Lab or Citronelle. Overseas, we've been fortunate to have had wonderful experiences in restaurants that we've likewise returned to. Celebrations that we have spent a year waiting to relive.
Tonight, Charlie Palmer was a birthday without a celebration. In fact the only celebration will be in the woods tomorrow behind our house...
Joe - thanks for a descriptive and humorous review. I really wish more people would take the time to offer reviews. This kind of post is what makes Chowhound worthwhile. Just curious, though...why didn't you send the steak back? At a place like CP, the staff surely would have graciously accommodated you...at least, I hope they would...I tend to be pretty accepting when things go awry, but if I was paying $84 for a steak I'd expect it to be perfect!
Thanks, dcandohio for the very nice words. We thought about sending it back but it had been sliced into 1/4 and 1/2" thick strips with the bone left in the kitchen. Presentation included mushrooms layered over the steak with their cooking juice. We weren't sure how they would continue to cook the many strips; if they had it certainly would not have tasted the way it would have if cooked correctly and then presented. To be honest, asking them to replace an $84 cut of meat was daunting for me plus with the three sides already on the table I didn't want them to have to be replaced also. I felt that it would be ten to fifteen minutes before a "new" steak was returned and after a couple of bites of the lukewarm sides feared they would have been cold by then also. I've sent food back before but this was different. Literally everything for the main course seemed to have a problem of sorts; only the mac and goat cheese was really acceptible and that wasn't very good. Our dinner had been thrown together-there seemed to be too much that had to be replaced. Frankly, after a couple of bites and not even the mustard helping we knew that we had made a huge mistake with, for us, no real option. If this had been a single cut of beef that could be cooked for another minute or two it would have been different.
re: Joe H
Joe, you're too kind. I hope Charlie Palmer appreciates your money if not your bad press for his establishment.
I suppose that it might be a good thing to put into the mental filing cabinet for anyone going there for the same sliced steak you had to ask, when they brought it out whole in the skillet before taking it back for slicing, would be to ask the waiter to cut into it and check it to be sure it was done to your liking. It must be pretty tricky to cook a 3" thick hunk of beef, but spectacular when it comes out right.
In retrospect we should have asked for this. Afterwards, with the ten or twelve slices/slabs of steak served along with the three sides that had another 10 to 15 minutes on them (or in the case of the potatoes NEEDED another ten to fifteen minutes) it was too late to ask for a replacement (s). If, at the moment of initial presentation we had done that much of this could have been averted and the meal might have been entirely different. Now, I remember a presentation in Florence at diVinus on the far side of the Arno where a similar Bisteca Fiorentina was presented and cut by the server at the table, sliced twice to the bone over a bed of arugula. The presentation allowed us to see how the steak was cooked. Juice spurted out coating the wooden platter it rested on. There, the correctly charred and properly prepared several inch thick Porterhouse elicited anticipatory moans; at Palmer's upon clearing away the many mushrooms that obscured the beef we had a different reaction than we did in Italy.
Joe, I am sorry for both you and (with fond Birthday wishes) Carol. For what its worth, your dinner experience at CP is not much different from mine . . . except I did not have good service. After two sub-par dinners, I have crossed it off my list. One thought: is it possible that CP puts all of its energy into doing a good business lunch trade?
Hi Bonz! We wondered if the chef was off-it was Monday night and whoever was in charge of the kitchen just wasn't very competent. On my one visit several years ago it was for a lunch and the experience was different. This, as my first evening visit, was the first time that I saw the dining without light coming in the windows. I didn't really like the amibience either. Last, after a lengthy dinner at Aquila y Sol in Mexico City last week (arguably the best restaurant in the city) and an extraordinarily flavorful seared, then sliced steak with a chipotle salsa as one of the courses this was a huge disappointment. Literally in about 96 hours I had one of the best steaks I've ever experienced and perhaps the worst.
I've never had a good meal there, having tried several dinners and several lunches over the years. In fact, I've been served several inedible things, including corn soup that was thicker and chalkier than school paste. I've never had a good steak there. And I've never had good service there.
I believe they make all their money renting private rooms for lobbyists to host "receptions" or "stuff money in a Congressman's pocket". I see those rooms in use day and night.
Well written Joe! My condolences for a disappointing experience for you and yours. But thank you for sharing your experience. I feel your (burp!) pain.
Another reason to avoid eating out on a Monday. Quality of food is probably the last thing the capitol crooks care about when schmoozing.
Joe, Sorry to hear about your birthday dinner, but your experience couldn't be further from what I've experienced the 8 or 10 times I've dined at CP's. Whether it has been just a lunch for a couple of us from the office (my office is right behind the restaurant) or a wine dinner for 20 of us, the meals have always been excellent and the steak cooked exactly to my specifications.
Good post, Joe H., though sorry for your disappointment. One thing you wrote particularly struck a chord: Restaurants' varying definitions of what constitutes ``rare,'' ``medium rare'' and ``medium,'' etc. Used to be you could order what you like & be assured the steak served would be on target. I go to steak restaurants rarely but when I do, I tend to ask servers what ``medium rare'' and ``medium'' are like. Medium rare is my prefered outcome but sometimes I order medium because the server's description of ``medium rare'' is (in my mind at least) closer to ``rare.''
Wow I am incredibly sorry to hear this. We have only been to CP last year for restaurant week and I still remember how incredible our meal was. We ordered the twice baked truffle potato and got not one but TWO HUGE portions...and they were so perfect we still dream about them. That and the tuna tartar. So sad to see such a bad review...we had kept planning to go back,
I can say the bar area is bored....but we barely spent time there. Thankfully
So sad your experience was so subpar.:(
I should note as a followup Charlie Palmer has a new chef. I suspect our Monday evening visit was either "between" chefs or on the night the "old" chef was off.
Sorry your birthday bash got bashed.
I appreciate your reluctance to send back bad food.
However, since your steak was sufficiently awful to drive you here, I really think you should have sent it back while there. As for not wanting to make it worse with the steak already cut and the sides already served, that shouldn't be the customer's concern. If it is inedible, it is enough to send it back, and they must make good on it, even if it means they start from scratch, and deliver sides fresh and hot with a brand new steak.
It's funny, I have friends who are good at sending back food they don't like. To be honest, I am not! I can't remember the last time I sent something back. But in the scenario you describe, I think I would have. If it's that bad, and at those prices, and on that special occasion, I think I would have mustered the courage to request a proper order, cooked not raw, and with fresh sides. It's one thing to be a little off, but to miss the mark that much... you should have sent it back not only for your sake, but also for theirs.
Bad steak notwithstanding, happy birthday!!!
re: Joe H
Not being a red meat fan (in fact you have made me not want to get any for a year so thanks for that!!! :) i can't really relate to even wanting a 3 inch steak but i too would imagine it would be very difficult to cook it properly so that it would be nicely charred on the outside (but not over done) and MR on the inside. And dont EVER be afraid to send anything back, esp at those prices. I have had so many restaurant owners & managers tell me they would much rather have the chance to make it right and perhaps get return business than have a person such as yourself go away upset and share that with others. We eat at those types of restaurants every week and i share your feeling about not wanting to waste food that is that expensive, but given how much other food you ordered, as well as a decent bottle of wine, they would not have thought you were just being difficult (esp since it was a special occasion). In fact, what they should have done if you had spoken up is replace the ENTIRE meal so it all came out together and hot.
I have a suggestion: next time you have a special occasion, go to 1789. Hubby and i went last night ( that is our usual special occasion place if we are home) for belated V day and it was, as always, exquisite. They seated us right next to the fireplace at a 4 top (lots of room, realy nice) per my open table request. Hubby had NY strip (really tasty) and i had butter poached lobster over couscous and spinach which was as delicious as it sounds. We actually started with a cheese course (from the dessert menu!) and finished with a shared chocolate dome dessert. We had a 97 brunello since it was a special occasion and it was just like the butter on my lobster...SMOOTH! The waiter was wonderful, giving us another bottle of Fiji gratis after ours ran out and also sub'd the 18 year old McAllen hubby ordered for an after dinner drink with a 50 year old version. Hubby was in heaven! Then he brought us after dessert cordial glasses of port. it was a truly memorable evening. He took our valet ticket for us and had the car outside, heating up & waiting for us, after we finished (btw the valet is free there....always a bonus in Gtown). So please try that next time and i promise you won't be throwing dinner in the woods...and if there WAS anything wrong they would make it right immediately (but in probably 30 visits over the years we have never had anything be less than perfect...) Happy birthday!
Thank you, DCDoll: we love 1789! I've actually been going there for far too many years that I want to admit to! It's been home to a number of celebrations for us over the years as well as where we've taken visiting friends. It is, indeed, very special. Thank you for thinking of me in suggesting it.
And, the '97 Brunello sounds especially nice, too!!