Mermaid Inn - ho hum
I needed a place to have a late dinner after a movie in the east village last night. so I did some research on this board and on Menupages. Mermaid has lots of positive reviews and no serious negatives, so we gave it a try. Judging by the seemingly happy mob of customers, I can only assume that no one cooks at home or has a clue how to do it. Is it too much to expect that a restaurant should be able to provide an experience that I would have difficulty duplicating at home? The food was not bad but was totally ordinary and lacking in creativity. I can buy a beautiful piece of fish from Citarella and with a simple preparation make a much more interesting and tasty meal than I had here. We started with fried oysters (tasty batter but tasteless oysters) and sardines (well-seasoned but in a bland broth with white beans and carrot bits), for main course skate with a blood orange emulsion (this sounded promising but was bland compared to the skate dish I make with lime, basil, capers and parsley) and the lobster sandwich ($24 for a small amount of lobster on a roll with fries) that was perfectly edible but also rather bland. The freebie chocolate pudding had little chocolate flavor. Overall a totally underwhelming dinner.
Mermaid Inn is a decent neighborhood restaurant but I certainly wouldn't go out of my way to eat there.
I had a few great experiences at the one in the EV...Love love loved the pasta with salad on top...ALso thought the mussles were the best...
So, when i heard they were opening an upper west side locations i was psyched...
I think they did a great job with the place...our waitress was awesome...But my pasta on the salad on top was not as enjoyable as the one as i had eaten in the EV...I was also disappionted with the mussles...I hope they get their act together...
i just went once a few months ago...had the lobster sandwich which was pretty meh...the bun was terrible...kind of stale. the fries were good though.
"Is it too much to expect that a restaurant should be able to provide an experience that I would have difficulty duplicating at home?"
Well, actually, yeah, I don't think that's a fair standard in general, at least if you're more than a barebones, get-food-on-the-table cook yourself. Lobster is * always * expensive in restaurants - it's juts a given, like it or not. And in my experience it's absolutely not something to order just because it happens to be on a menu. (I order lamb very rarely for the same reason. I shudder wondering how neighborhood Chinese restaurants manage that when maybe two dozen people order the dish in a year...
Unless a place is on the pricey side or puports to offer particular specialties, why would you expect a "noteworthy" meal every time you eat out? I think that's one definite downside of the latter-day food-as-lifestyle thing - everyone expects every dish and every meal to provide some sort of "experience" rather than just being a decemt/pleasant/whatever "meal."
Now, poorly prepared food is another thing, but that's different from your opening salvo, as it were and it's not entirely clear to me what your standard is when you call things tasteless or bland...
So you apparently don't expect much from a restaurant where a dinner for 2 costs upwards of $120. I do. There are restaurants that for this much or less (Crispo, Punch, Nice Matin, just to name a few) manage to produce dishes that make me say "mmm, this is really tasty food". Yes I am more than a barebones, get-food-on-the-table cook, and that is exactly my point. That the only people I could imagine praising this restaurant can't or don't cook at home. If a chef in a not-cheap restaurant can't or won't bother to come up with flavorful, interesting dishes, I hardly think that says anything good about the chef or the restaurant. If your only purpose in going out to restaurants is to be fed, you can do it for a lot less money. I was not expecting "noteworthy", but I was not expecting dull either.
As for the lobster, why put it on the menu if it is not worth ordering? We ordered it not "because it happens to be on the menu" but because we expected that if it is on the menu it should be worth ordering. I can't imagine what the confusion is about the meaning of "bland".
"So you apparently don't expect much from a restaurant where a dinner for 2 costs upwards of $120"
No argument there, though these days in Manhattan that's scarily close to many places beyond diner if you get a "full" meal with alcohol. (sigh) I've never eaten at Mermaid Inn, nor been tempted, so I didn't have their price range in mind. From the way you said "looking for a late dinner after a movie", I guess I was thinking more middle-of-the-road since the rest of your post seemed to be a more general complain. My bad. ;)