reservations and charging
this happened to friends of mine at a Chinese restaurant in NYC. They made a reservation for 30 people and only 22 showed up on the night. The restaurant however, told them at the end of their meal that they would have to pay for 30 places and that this was their policy. They were not told this on booking the table but only after the meal.
Is this valid and has this happened to anyone else? They all coughed up the extra money but were obviously not happy with the arrangement and would not return.
I think it's valid but only if they were advised beforehand. It's common for hotels and caterers to do it for banquets, and for very popular restaurants to charge a no-show fee for reservations. It's not unreasonable, either the food has been prepared and will be wasted, or there are empty seats that could have been filled, Either way it costs the establishment money.
Charging without advising beforehand is likely not enforceable, your friends could probably have refused to pay it, but maybe they recognized that they were inconsiderate to reserve for so many more than they really required.
I am starting to wonder. There is another thead on this same thing happening at a sushi restaurant. The consensus seems to be that the fish was bought and prepared with the original number in mind and, caveat emptor, they had to pay for the original number of people, even though some didn't show.
Now you're saying it happened at a Chinese restaurant? I'm not so sure I can accept this one. This just sounds like highway robbery to me. The only difference with the Chinese restaurant is that the food not eaten but forced to be bought could be taken home as leftovers.
Wow, is this yet another question that has to be asked in advance of a reservation?
"your friends could probably have refused to pay it, but maybe they recognized that they were inconsiderate to reserve for so many more than they really required"
That seems rather harsh. They had 22 people show... only 8 short of the reservation which is modest. Yes, they could've called ahead and adjusted the reservation # but really... it's not that big of an offense and they still brought alot of money into that restaurant w/ their party of 22. I don't get the impression this was a high end fine dining establishment where the table real estate is extremely costly.... b/c if it were they surely would of advised of their policy at the time the reservation was made. Quite honestly, the restaurant should have taken the name & tel. # of the guest making the reservation and then confirmed the # in the party that day. That's what we do at our restaurant.... to avoid this issue.
I, personally, would've refused to pay it. That's just poor management b/c now most of you will not return. They basicly cut off their nose to spite their face.
I think it was a similar situation to the other post, they didn't know that some wouldn't show until the reservation time had come and gone. You know how it is, a large group agree to get together, someone makes a reservation, then a few people can't make it for whatever reason and don't bother to let anyone know.
>the restaurant should have taken the name & tel ... then confirmed ...
perhaps it would have been smart for the resto to do that, but it
doesnt make sense for that to be the rule. see e.g. "(Learned) Hand Rule".
the obligation should be on the party in a "better position" with an eye to
efficiency ... meaning lower cost or more information. obviously the patron
has better knowledge of the changes to his RSVP. should the restaurant
call twice ... once one day in advance and again for any last minute changes?
on the flip side, say a restaurant "has a problem" and cannot honor the
rsvp ... obviously they ought to call the customer and say "they are closed
due to emergency". it is not reasonable for the customer to call and verify
"you guys havent been hit by a landslide, right" [see SF: Helmand].
advanced law and economic analysis:
since the RSVP charge is usually less than what a typical patron would
run up, they may face some cost for not reallocating the table space
for those guests who dont appear, so presumably they still would rather
have you honor your rsvp than hope for no-shows and to collect the
penalty fee ... so the incentives are reasonable on both parties and it
is not unreasonable for the restuarant to call, but it is also clear that is
not where the obligation should be. now of course it is true that if a resto
stiffs you, there is nothing you can do ... i.e. you cant say "if you seat me
+30min after my RSVP, you will have to give me a free dessert" ... although
you can bad mouth them in the via the Google Cache.
Coming back to this case: i think this 100% turns on whether their "policy"
was adequately disclosed or not. So it turns on issues of "contract formation",
before getting into issues about obligations to mitigate damage or the amount
the resto can concsionable charge for each no show. you could in the pathological
case find n people on the street and offer to buy them a plate of fried rice :-)
It sounds to be like it was not disclosed ... and in that case I suppose my view is
"the obligation of the patron to call is a moral one, not a legal/$ one". So OP's
associate is a "bad person" but not liable for money damages.
But he in turn may have a "moral claim" on anybody who flaked without notice.
"perhaps it would have been smart for the resto to do that, but it
doesnt make sense for that to be the rule."
-It makes perfect sense for a resto to do that. They will then have a clear idea of what to expect and will not be faced w/ a situation like this: pissed off guests that did show for the large party and now will never return b/c of an unreasonable and undisclosed policy. It's a sensible business practice to confirm large party reservations. Besides, that's what hosts do. Particularly with large parties.
It makes perfect sense.
but this is not always possible. You know how it is, an informal gathering on an evening, possible work colleagues or club or sports friends, someone says let's all go out for a meal, 30 say yes and only 22 show. Even if they had all replied in writing things come up, someone doesn't feel like it, someone can't get a sitter, someone gets a date instead and suddenly your numbers are down.
And then the poor person who said they would make the reservation gets stuck with the charge on her credit card.
Yes, I know... but it's the nature of the beast when you're business involves the public. Good customer service is what drives this industry and the ones that fail in that area, fail period. I watch time and again an owner kiss ass, apologize and give away gift cards to folks, many of whom don't deserve it. But in town which is one of the fastest growing cities in the U.S., he's got a very successful restaurant where so many have failed b/c of the competition. It b/c people like him and he bends over backwards for them. Don't get me wrong, I hate how inconsiderate folks can be... drives me crazy. But knowing how to finesse it pays.
The original comment has been removed
Here's a thought. What if the patron had called the restaurant ahead of time, either the sushi place or the Chinese restaurant, and informed them that the number of people was being decreased?
What would the restaurant do? Tell the patron on the phone, 'oh sorry, we already ordered ahead for you and you have to pay for the original number'?
Then what would happen if the patron, as I would, told them to go fly a kite and that they weren't coming to dinner at all?
Would the restaurant send the bill to their house for no food eaten?
Nah, I'm not buying any of this.
It's highway robbery and I wouldn't stand for it.
As someone said, don't hold a reservation with a credit card and don't pay for food not requested.
When I owned a full service Korean Rest the only time I would charge for "no-shows" was if the party had ordered in advance and then failed to reduce the order prior to the reservation.
The reason I would charge in this case was that the food for XX people had already been prepared.
If it was a simple reservation with no pre-order, no charge for the "no-shows" because I could re-arrange seating to have the tables available for other guests.
this is an interesting topic that has been coming up with some frequency lately.
i have some general comments about the assumptions being made by customers.
when you make a reservation, the restaurant organizes the restaurant around you, especially if you are a large party. when you have less people than you said you would have, it's no big thing to you, but to the restaurant, it represents chairs that could have been sat with paying cutomers, but instead were waiting for you. it's disrespectful not to call. having a third of your party not show up is a big deal for the kitchen, the dining room, the staff. it costs them money. they offer reservations as a convenience to you, and then you abuse this by not honoring the reservation you made. if the restaurant is busy, you're costing them table space that could have been used. if they're slow, you're costing them food they prepared and now can't use, as well as extra staff they kept on, uneccesarily.
they should warn you, of course. but you should honor your reservation, or call ahead - it's really not that hard to do.
it's not a grocery store, you're not just paying for food - you're paying for service, preparation, atmosphere, dishwashers, blah, blah, blah. and it's not your living room, you can't just invite a ton of people and not concern yourself with how many will actually show up.