Is Iron Chef for real?
I am new to the chowhound boards so please excuse me, but I would like to know as lovers of the food and dining realm, what are we actually learning from a show like 'Iron Chef.' How is it possible for the chefs involved not to know what the 'secret ingredient' is in advance. We don't ever see them running down a quick menu with their staffs. (I don't believe it for a second.) How is it possible to maintain such an extraordinary 'mise en place', just about every thing in the food chain and equipment arsenal is available to the participating chefs. And to make a long blog short, why do the chefs involved feel compeled to prepare a dessert dish out of any secret ingredient involved...fish foam brulee, anyone? And some of the judges...please! What happened to those second rate Asian actresses?
I do, however, find the show fine as a form of entertainment, only after the host is finished with his opening bite bit. What is the true mission statement here?
-
-
i worked for a chef who did the iron chef battle and they knew the 3 possible secret ingredients about a month in advance. they did all kinds of practice runs. they were also allowed to bring in certain ingredients of their own that would've been impossible to make in one hour, like stocks, as well as order the supporting ingredients to be stocked in the pantry.
the iron chefs are also guaranteed a certain percentage of wins, like bobby flay gets to win 92% of the time or something like that. it's in their contracts. cat cora gets the least guaranteed wins. it's kind of funny, if you pay really close attention to the editing sometimes you can tell they cut off some of the judges gushing about the contender's food so the iron chefs look better.
›2 Replies-
re: tastycakes
"the iron chefs are also guaranteed a certain percentage of wins, like bobby flay gets to win 92% of the time or something like that. it's in their contracts. "
OK, now that just sucks, IMO. Guaranteed wins? Give me a break! If they're so good, they should put their stuff out there and allow their food to be judged for real. But I guess that wouldn't help their restaurants' bottom lines or TFN's merchandising deal(s) if they were beaten by more challengers.
-
-
-
I've never watched this show before and I have a quick question/comment. If the chefs get a list of three possible secret ingredients ahead of time, wouldn't they cook trial meals? I thought Jamie Oliver looked genuinely taken aback by the fish. He also said that he'd never cooked with it before. I find it hard to believe that he'd lie. Am I naive?
›3 Replies -
Recently I caught an episode that was basically 'inside iron chef', hosted by Alton Brown. I wasn't taking notes or paying all that much attention, but what I caught about what 'really' goes on was interesting. I believe the episode was done nearly 4 years ago, but it was shown fairly recently and will most likely air again. The episode number was IANS05.
-
Perhaps it's just part of the circus atmosphere but I was taken back by the match between Oliver and Batali last night on Iron Chef...Apparently Oliver's assistant is some sort of a clown with bad hygiene...why would I want to see him remove sweat from his forehead with his knife in the midst of cooking then lay it back down on the counter? There were overturned garbage containers, throwing of ingredients and splattering all over the place...By the way, the episode itself combined the talents of two of the worst dressers on 'food tv'...Not very appetizing at all in my opinion...Am I missing something here?
›7 Replies-
re: gutreactions
Oliver's sous-chef did wipe his brow with the kitchen knife, and at least wiped it off on a cloth before continuing, but yeah it was still kind of gross. Still nothing compared to what goes on in the kitchens of real restaurants.
As for dress, part of what the chefs wear is costume/wardrobe provided by the Food Network. Mario's crocs were originally designed for chefs before all the kiddies started buying them.
-
-
re: gutreactions
I remember reading (on another message board, so yeah, consider the source) a while ago before Crocs were popular, that they were designed for chefs because of their good traction, and the smaller holes in the top (smaller skin exposure than open sandals) meant less likelihood of hot splatters hitting the top of the feet.
As for the shorts...longer apron is in order I guess!
-
-
re: gutreactions
Clogs - or crocs have been worn in the cooking industry for a very long time. They are made especially for industries such and cooking and nursing. They are much more comfortable and better for your feet than regular shoes. I have known chefs to wear clogs for years and I am sure with the advent of crocs that some of them have switched to them.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
OP,
Watch PBS if you want some cooking instruction. IC and ICA were/are all about entertainment. Yeah, the chefs are given a short list of possibilities for the "secret" ingredient. Yeah, they try hard to make all courses (including dessert) from that ingredient. Yeah, the Chairman doesn't live in a castle. What could have possibly caused you to think that you should be expecting to learn how to cook?
-
Here is another article about the inner workings of Iron chef. I found this article quite entertaining when I read it.
›1 Reply -
-
I can't even believe that America still making ' iron chef (America) '
I remember I was watching this show ( original ) when I was kid .( I was living in japan )
which is ? about more than 10 years ago or so ?I think ' iron chef ' is enough .even 'america' version.
I think chef morimoto's ' difficult ' look is just very old school Japanese style.
Japanese man who is chef ,they all have quite similar attitude.
and He is from south area of japan.
which is what Japanese call 'kyu u shyu danji '
the most stubborn very very old school Japanese style people.He look like one of them, & he is.
I don't surprise american people think he has 'difficult look'›1 Reply -
I too had the same question. I have not spoken to any of the chefs, but spoke to a judge and was told that the winner was not set in advance. The taste, presentation and if the dish was something that was created for the theme ingredient or was it a part of the chef's normal bag of tricks.
The poster that said that all the chefs are given a head's up on three or four ingredient is true for our Iron Chef and for Japanese program.
I love to see the dishes being prepared and look forward to trying to created something like the dishes myself.
-
This link will answer a bunch of your questions about the show. I hope it helps. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11500312/
›6 Replies -
I think the cooking is real, but as others have pointed out, not all of the set-up is real.
I think it would be hard to fake "kitchen stadium," with all the equipment and food. Most of the fictions are things that, if you watch the show carefully, you can infer.Some of the fictions include:
The chairman is an actor. He's not really the nephew of the original chairman.
The challenger doesn't challenge the iron chef right then and there -- it's prearranged, and the challenger probably doesn't get much, if any input into who to battle.
As others have mentioned, the contestants get list of possible theme ingredients in advance.
There's some fudging with plating. As you may have noticed, in the American version, the chef only has to plate one of each of his courses before the hour is up. They then have some time afterward to plate the rest for the judges.
None of these fictions bother me, since it seems obvious to me that there is a large element of spectacle in the show. Worrying about that would be kind of like being upset at a stage actor for using fake blood during a performance.
They have actully on a couple of occasions shown Mario Batali running down a quick menu with his assistants. But the fact that we usually don't see this happening doesn't mean that it isn't happening, since they can't show everything.
I treat the show as pure entertainment. Still, it's one of the last shows on the Food Network that ever shows any techinically difficult cooking.
›2 Replies-
re: jlafler
One of the original Iron Chef Japanese, Rokusaburu Michiba, ised to make a big show of writitng the menu out in Japanese caligraphy before he starts cooking. The original was also more of a goof than anything else with silly starlets making cute little comments as commentators and a know it all color guy who ended up challenging the Iron Chef once. The whole thing had a lot more schtick to it, the American show has more of an inside joke quality to it.
Its a goof.
-
-
-
I've actually spoken w/a chef who was on an episode of Iron Chef America and he said they were given 3 possible choices for the secret ingredient but were not told until they got there which one it was. It makes sense b/c not only do they have to figure out the menu based around the ingredient they also have to make sure everything is done w/in an hour.
›15 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: nc213
I met Morimot when his NYC restaurant opened. I thought he was incredibly nice. His English is fine. I think they dub over his voice because for some people, any accent makes the person difficult to understand. I've even encountered Americans that have trouble understanding Brits!
-
-
-
re: alkapal
I don't think he was difficult, I think it was more a culture gap then a language gap. The investors didn't seem to understand the significance of the giant sushi roll or the sake ceremony, and seemed more worried about the opening itself. Once the restaurant opened they were rolling along just fine.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I heard once that the chefs -- at least in the Japanese version -- are given a list of possible ingredients that the "secret ingredient" will be drawn from. Considering what we see in the "quickfire" challenges on Top Chef, I'm not too surprised that an experienced chef with some good helpers and top of the line equipment can turn out a meal like that in an hour.
The true mission statement is to entertain. Is there some reason to think it is something else?
-
Welcome to the boards!
I watched the old iron chef (from 8-9 years ago) the one that had English subtitles, and in the spirit of most things Japanese (I was born there) they do things so insanely over the top for people's enjoyment. Check out some of their crazy game shows!
Anyway, I think in the continuation of that spirit, it is for viewer's enjoyment, and for the spirit of crazed competition between chefs.
One of the critics of TV Guide actually thought the Chairman (the original guy) was a real person and went on and on in his column about the insanity of a man rich enough to fund a "kitchen stadium" and why, etc., etc. when there were so many other causes in the world worth helping. What a dingbat.
My jaw dropped. I couldn't believe this yahoo actually believed it was real. Obviously the chefs are the real deal, but anyone who was a true fan of the show knew that the whole "chairman" thing was just for show, and indeed, the actor that played the chairman was Japan's Jean Valjean of Les Miserables' fame.
So the old Iron Chef thing was retired, because Chairman was getting older and tired and they didn't realize it would be such a hit in the U.S. So Iron Chef America was born.
Sorry to digress. I totally agree with MMRuth. Fun to watch with occasional educational bits.
Chow!
›7 Replies-
-
-
re: zin1953
I always found it wildly amusing, though, how they'd give a heavily accented German voiceover, for example, if they had a German chef on the show. Totally tacky and silly, which I guess goes perfectly with the whole idea of Iron Chef.
I never found that the show taught me much, but it did spark my creativity. I'd find myself pausing each episode five or six times to scribble down ideas I suddenly had for my own dishes at home.
-
-
re: gloriousfood
And the permanent know it all, the cooking school owner is always the very patient older male voice of reason.
I always like the pretty female judges, there always seem to be some kind of double entendre going on due to their giggling and carrying on while there really isn't, at least in the dubbed version.
-
-
-
-
-

















