Are these wines good to drink now?
Im totally uneducated when it comes to wines. I just wrote down a list of wines we have in the basement and wanted to see if they were good to drink now (had bought them a while ago and/or received them as gifts)
Anyway, here is the list:
--Ravenswood Vintners blend..2000 Cali. Zinfandel
--Beringer 1996 Chenin Blanc
--Beringer 1996 Napa Valley Chardonnay Private Reserve
--Rosemount Estate 2002 Shiraz
--RH Phillips 1997 Chardonnay
--Robert Mondavi 1995 Chardonnay Reserve
--Chalk Hill 1996 Chardonnay
--J. Strub 1996 Neirsteiner Hipping Riesling Spatlese
--Meursault 1995 White burgundy
( also discovered 4 bottles of champagne left over from parties (unopened)...would those still be good as well? The Perrier & Jouet is dated 1990, Im not sure about the others)
Thanks so much!
Yes, with one or two possible exceptions, they're all ready to drink. Some may even be past peak. The possible exceptions are the Riesling and the Meursault, which, depending on the producer and assuming good storage conditions, may have plenty of life left in them. On the other hand, they may not and they're probably drinking well now, so seize the day.
Carswell is being quite diplomatic, I think.
-- Ravenswood makes their Vintners Blend Zinfandel for current consumption. That doesn't mean it cannot age, but it does mean they are ready to drink as soon as it hits the shelf. This 2000 was released five years ago. It may be fine, but I'd have a backup handy just in case.
-- Beringer makes their Chenin Blanc to drink now, and it generally doesn't age well. For an off-dry California Chenin Blanc, 10+ years is pushing it.
-- Beringer's Private Reserve Chardonnay can age a bit, but this is a 1996, and that's a very long time for 99% of all California Chardonnays.
-- Rosemount Estate 2002 Shiraz . . . this istheir "black diamond" label, I presume. Should be fine, but I wouldn't hang onto it for much longer.
-- RH Phillips makes wines, again, ready to drink now. It is one year younger than the Beringer, and its aging potential is is far less.
-- As for the Robert Mondavi, this has a slightly better change than the Beringer, IMHO, but . . .
-- When it comes to the Chalk Hill, their Chardonnays typically have better structure, better acidity either Beringer and/or Mondavi. Still, it's nearly 11 years of age.
-- J. Strub 1996 Neirsteiner Hipping Riesling Spatlese may work.
-- Meursault is a region within Burgundy, and you don't mention the producer, but this, too, may be fine.
As far as the Champagnes are concerned, the 1990 Perrier-Jouët should be fine. Without knowing the names of the other bottles, it's hard to hazzard a guess.
For the Ravenswood VB Zin, I usually pick up a case/year for cooking and for the cook. I often have a few that languish for a year, or so, in the cellar, and they are still good, for what they are, but I'd wonder about seven years in the cellar. They should not be "bad," but worry that there will be much left in them.
As for some of the domestic (US) Chards, I think that it'll depend on exactly what one likes in a Chard. I've had some great domestic Chards with 10+ years on them, but rather like a well-structured Chard with some age. My wife likes 'em younger, so one's MMV on these.
I agree, regarding the Meursault. Depending on the producer, it should be great, or very good, if one likes an aged Chard.
In very general terms, I'd plan on "drinking up," and hope for the best with most of these.
Remember, your "prime" might well be my "over the hill," or vice versa. If stored well, none should be "bad," just a little flat and one-dimensional now.
None of those is too young. Some may be too old. The Perrier Joet should be consumed now and should be very good.
All but the shiraz and possibly the Meursault & riesling are probably past peak... the Zinfandel is probably peaking now...
That said, assuming it's true, it's still interesting to try bottles that are supposedly over the hill... often you discover that they've matured quite nicely and retain alot of their drinkability despite a bit of decay... it would be very interesting to get your tasting notes on these bottles, please report same.
There's lots that I like about cellatracker, but the drinking windows are often pretty arbitrary in my experience. I believe they are just based on community averages, so if you have a wine that only one person has entered a drinking window for, and that person has put "from 2005 thru 2099", that's the window you'll get. If a second person then puts "from 2010 thru 2019", you will presumably end up with something like "from 2007 thru 2049". Not terribly helpful. It's a bit more reliable with more widely purchased wines (assuming you believe in the wisdom of the herd).
You don't say what the basement conditions are like (exposure to light, temperature.) If they've just been sitting on a shelf exposed to room lighting at temps comfortable to people, they're probably all toast; the cooler and darker the conditions, the better your chances; reasonable humidity too is even better. Some lesser Riesling can age very well but that particular one is unlikely to be anything "special" (good-ish producer, OK year) and prematurely aged Riesling, if that's the case, is a bit unusual, let's say. But as everyone else is saying, it can't hurt to check 'em out, just don't make dinner party plans around them...