-
-
-
I've been to 2 Ruth's Chris, NYC, and Long Island, and to Morton's in Chicago. I liked the steaks better at Ruth's, (I like the butter sizzle thing) and I liked the seafood better at Mortons. If I had a choice I would go to Ruth's Chris, I even liked it more then a recent visit to Keen's in NYC.
-
As you probably realize, the two are a bit different, and either one would be an excellent choice for a special dinner.
With Morton's, you have a very upscale atmosphere and they bring the cuts of meat to your table for you to decide which you want. They have some interesting "rules" (they won't cook a filet well done, for instance), and the preparation of the food is immaculate. There's no hurry for you to quickly eat your meals and leave.
Ruth's Chris is also excellent, but the atmosphere is a bit more casual than Morton's--Ruth's Chris is perfect for a typical business dinner and Morton's is better if you are really trying to impress a client.
Both places are expensive, but Ruth's Chris would probably be a bit easier on your wallet. Either way, you can't go wrong (unless your significant other is a Vegan...!).
›3 Replies-
-
-
re: lar3ry
My experience is limited to Ruth's Chris in Florida, Connecticut, and Ohio and Morton's in Ohio and Connecticut. My person preference is Ruth's as Morton's doesn't have french fries - so that implies the beef, service, and cost are essentially equivalent in my opinion. Also don't think you can go wrong at either.
-

