What is the statute of limitations before a restaurant visit is outdated
- Firenza00 Aug 14, 2007 03:16 PM
This came up after talking with a fellow ChowHounder. In a recent thread, people were giving opinions on a restaurant when they hadn't been there in over five years, and in the meantime, the restaurant actually changed its name. I just this minute saw someone commenting on a place that they hadn't been to in EIGHT years. Given the ebb and flow of the restaurant business, that seems like an eternity.
I'm just trying to see if there's any type of consensus on how recent a visit needs to be in order to still remain valid.
I know exactly what you mean. I just saw a message where the poster hadn't been to a restaurant since it first opened about fourteen years ago. S/he encouraged people to go!
My own rule of thumb is two years. So much can happen to make a recommendation or review obsolete that even two years can be too long.
I also tend to avoid restaurants where the posted reviews are all 5+ years (unless of course I have some positive, recent recommendations from friends).
The original comment has been removed
my personal take is 6 months. maybe that's because i'm in phoenix and the whole city changes in the summer, with people leaving to escape the heat, etc.
but if i comment on a place i hadn't been to in at least 6 months, i think its appropriate to mention it. but saying something regarding a place you hadn't been in 8 years? COME ON!!!