HOME > Chowhound > Austin >

Discussion

Who serves a good black & blue steak in Austin?

Does anyone even serve black & blues in town? I love 'em but never see it as an option. In fact the last time I got a steak in a restaurant the waiter didn't even know what I meant.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. Austin Land & Cattle has it as an option on their menu, but I've never tried it.

    1 Reply
    1. re: ftf

      It wasn't a bad steak but overdone for my tastes. I think I'm just gonna have to get a cow and a flamethrower.

    2. I bet if you called ahead to your favorite quality steakhouse they would accomodate you. The meat has to be well chilled to get the black and blue you are looking for.

      1 Reply
      1. re: rollledspleen

        Never even thought of that...good thinking.

      2. I've had an EXCELLENT black & blue (aka Pittsburgh) at Gumbo's in Round Rock. The first time we went and ordered it the waiter told us the kitchen staff cheered when he put in our order and the manager gave us free dessert. Most Austinites like their meat tough and grey, IME.

        Anyway, get their Steak Yoli and you won't be disappointed. The steaks have been perfectly cooked every time we've gone.

        1. Austin Land and Cattle, and it's very good.

          1. Curious, black and blue means blackened on the outside extremely rare on the inside?

            8 Replies
            1. re: adkim

              Bingo. And "Chicago" means blackened on the outside w/o being cool on the inside. Black & blue can make you a little queasy if you're eating a huge piece of beef, in my opinion. Hooliganyouth, what cut of meat do you usually order for the black & blue?

              I love me some steak. If you find an amazing steakhouse (sadly, Austin Land & Cattle defintely doesn't qualify), please let me know.

              Is Gumbo's Round Rock related to Gumbo's Downtown? If it is the same place, I can plan a visit immediately.

              1. re: tom in austin

                I don't know if they are still related, but I've had the steak Yoli and the steak George at Gumbo's downtown and they werre both exceptionally good.

                1. re: Rene

                  I tried Gumbo’s recently, after reading about it on this board. The tenderloin St. George was a well-cooked, good-quality steak, essentially served with a crabcake on top of it. I don’t like their crabcakes (see below for details), so that was one problem with the dish for me. The other was that the red-wine pepper sauce that came with the tenderloin was terrible. Plus, the accompanying potatoes and vegetable of the day tasted like afterthoughts.

                  There's a deeper issue with Gumbo’s sauces and stocks. The flavors just aren’t bright. You can usually at least taste the butter in sauces, but Gumbo's sauces are thin and flat. Even ones that contain Cajun blackening seasoning and raw garlic are oddly bland. Plus, no restaurant with “Louisiana” in the title should produce such a dismal version of béarnaise sauce. It hardly seems possible, but all their sauces taste canned.

                  Given the restaurant's name, I had to try a bowl of gumbo. It, too, tasted like it had come from a packaged brown-gravy-like soup base (maybe too much raw flour used when making the roux). It had no seafood flavor whatsoever. I understand why sometimes seafood gumbo isn’t made with seafood broth, because the broth plus the seafood could be overwhelming. When the seafood itself imparts no flavor to the gumbo, however, using a seafood broth would be better than nothing. The best-tasting part of this dish was the rice, which is not a good sign. I wanted to spit out the one bite of gumbo that I took.

                  Personally, I don't like the dry, stringy crabcakes that are served at Gumbo's, which are an essential part of the tenderloin St. George. I liked the ones at III Forks better (http://www.chowhound.com/topics/336638 ), though I didn’t like much else there. At Gumbo’s, the crab was simply not that flavorful, and the curiously mild sauce did not help matters.

                  The other dishes sampled all had their problems. The "grilled shrimp Robert” featured shrimp of poor quality. Like the frozen seafood you find at many grocery stores, these shrimp were watery, tiny, and tasteless. [I didn’t try the shrimp cocktail at Gumbo’s, though. Maybe they save the “good” shrimp for that.] Gumbo’s crawfish Eddy in a creamy tarragon sauce was better, if only because the crawfish were of better quality than the shrimp. The sauce was faintly spicy, but this dish was also pretty bland. The cornmeal-dusted fried oysters from the oysters Rockefeller appetizer were quite good: crisp and well-fried. However, the oysters traditionally served underneath the fried oysters in this appetizer were doused in a very sweet spinach Pernod sauce. The sauce was very rich from all the butter and bacon, but it tasted like they’d added sugar to it.

                  The one thing that I really liked at Gumbo’s was the New-Orleans-style custard. It was rich, eggy, and good—like a very custardy flan. One of my dining companions ordered the bread pudding and didn’t care for it. I'm afraid I can’t remember details. I was too busy scarfing down the custard.

                  I can see why people who work downtown would like Gumbo’s, especially if they're dining on an expense account. In my experience, however, their chow didn't seem worth a special trip. Given their high prices and flavorless sauces, stocks, and appetizers, I can't imagine going back, except maybe to have more of that custard.

                  1. re: MPH

                    I have to wonder if they have changed hands. My expereiences are absolutely nothing like yours ... and I do respect your oprinions. The George was a crab and crawfish or something sauce, rather than a cake. Hmmm... something must have changed!

                    1. re: Rene

                      Rene,

                      It's always possible. Or they just had an off night. When was the last time you went? I was there for an early dinner on a weekend, sometime within the last six weeks.

                      I should have been more clear. The crab on the tenderloin St. George wasn't exactly a crabcake, but it was an unmolded version of one. In other words, it was the same kind of crab, with the same flavoring. Since I'd just had the crabcakes as an appetizer, the similarity between the two was very obvious. The steak itself was well-charred, with pretty good texture and flavor for a tenderloin. It's just that the crab topping and the sauce were not; neither were the sides or the appetizers.

                      Best,
                      MPH

                      1. re: MPH

                        MPH,

                        It's been several months but not even close to a year. I googled the restaurant and this link to the Round Rock restaurant has a photo and description that supports my observation visually:

                        http://www.gumbosroundrock.com/about.htm

                        I found the tenderloin to be outstanding - tender and cooked to a perfect rare side of medium rare. I loved the Oysters Rockefeller. I think that something must have happened with ownership as I have been a somewhat regular customer for more than ten years... back when the original was near Wells Branch Pkwy. I think that Yoli has opened a couple of other places. If I recall correctly, they franchised a Gumbo's in Dallas but I don't know how that worked out.

                        I'm going to put the RR location on my to do list as I have not been in a couple of years. I think the location in the Brown Building is absolutely beautiful and always want to go there.

                        Best to you!

                        Rene'

                    2. re: MPH

                      MPH, I've never been to the downtown Gumbo's, but have not had a lackluster meal yet at the Gumbo's in RR. In fact I've been impressed (for Austin). Different management?

                      1. re: sweetbasil

                        I’ve been trying to unravel this, based on information from the Austin Business Journal, the Gumbo’s Round Rock website (http://www.gumbosroundrock.com/about.htm ), and general investigation. The first Gumbo’s was opened in 1994 in rural north Austin, by Michael and Yoli Amr. Michael Amr is also described as the “founding chef.” That original location was then moved to Round Rock and “upscaled.” In May of 1999, the Spicewood-based restaurant-company Fired Up, Inc. (the parent company of the Johnny Carino’s restaurant chain), bought the Round Rock location and opened the downtown location in the Brown Building.

                        In 2003, St. Gumbeaux, Inc., bought back the Gumbo’s locations and the Brown Bar. SGI is owned by Michael and Yoli Amr, the creators and founders of the “Gumbo’s concept,” to use their own marketing jargon, plus someone named Mike Quigley, whom I would guess is the investor who made the buy-back possible. That year, ownership passed from Fired Up to P2Q Enterprises LLC, in which Quigley is a major investor, to SGI.

                        In 2005, Shuler and Denise Page purchased the Round Rock location from SGI. Thus, the current Round Rock location is owned by totally new people. The chef at the Round Rock location is David Gore, who has “been there since the beginning.” This implies that he worked for Michael and Yoli Amr, in some capacity, starting in 1994.

                        I don’t know who is doing the cooking at the downtown location. The Amrs (plus Quigley) may own the place, but that doesn’t mean that Michael Amr is back in the kitchen.

                        It’s certainly possible that the chow at the Round Rock location, owned by completely new people, is better than that served at the downtown location, owned in part by the founders. Has anyone recently tried both? Perhaps some 'hound can compare their respective strengths and weaknesses.