Bruni Does Penthouse
I don't think I've ever read a more surreal review - Bruni finally ventures out of his personal comfort zone and we get this? I think this may be one of the biggest wastes of print space in the history of restaurant reviews!
http://events.nytimes.com/2007/02/28/...
-
I thought the review was an embarrassment, and I'm a big fan of Bruni.
His reviews have gotten really wierd lately, however. Considering he started off so well, with a thoughtful and cogent piece on why Babbo was a 3 rather than 4 star restaurant, it's odd that a few years later he would award 2 and 3 stars to places that have good food (Momofuku Ssam and The Modern Bar Room) but nothing approaching the level of service, attention to detail, and setting that a 3 and even a 2 star place should have. Yes, stars are already vague designations, but it doesn't help at all to have 3 stars awarded to WD-50, Eleven Madison Park, and the Bar Room.
I wonder if he knows how popular he is now and feels empowered to write whaterver he likes about whereever. Sure he can do that, but I think he's running the risk of becoming completely frivolous, and that would be a shame.
›1 Reply-
re: jasmurph
Two stars means "very good" as regards "the reviewer’s reaction to food, ambience and service, with price taken into consideration."
So a two-star rating for relatively inexpensive places such as Momofuku Ssam and Joe's Shanghai means something quite different than it does for expensive places such as Aureole and Le Perigord.
-
-
A fun review to read that effectively told me what I wanted to know: surprisingly good steaks, totally bizarre ambience; the description of the "buttery nipple" dessert was worth the whole article. Reviews are always about the critic as much as they're about the restaurant; at least Bruni is transparent about this.
-
-
-
The puns were monstrous- the whole thing was much better suited to his Diner's Blog, not for print space- I read it online- was the article in the actual print NYT? Not really a food article- the revenge/hidden agenda theory makes complete sense, given it's surreality.
›3 Replies -
-
-
-
I too think it's surreal, eye-rolling, and silly, but in a good way.
But here's my take:
this review is Bruni's way of exacting revenge on Chodorow. I mean, how often does Bruni do two separate reviews of steakhouses in the same month?By giving Penthouse / Robert's one star and a fairly favorable review, he's telling Chodorow that even STRIP CLUBS have better steak than Kobe Club.
You can dangle all the blade-down samurai swords you want (btw, this probably the most un-feng-shui thing imaginable), but the place with a functional broiler wins.
›1 Reply





