Cookbook of the Month: In Search of a New Organizer Who Can Start in March
I hope the new year finds you all well and busily enjoying the fruits of the season. Here in the Bay Area, I am preparing for a return to a full-time job-- a second full-time job, that is, in addition to caring for two young children. Although I've been happy to see how many people have participated in the Cookbook of the Month threads, I've been disappointed in my own contributions. I simply haven't had enough time, and now I expect to have even less.
This is a new year, though, and I'm hopeful that I'll be doing more cooking and less organizing. As part of this, I'd like to ask if any hound here is interested in taking over the cookbook of the month project. If you've read the threads I've posted, you've seen the work involved. I'm planning to tally the voting and post the threads for February but then step down.
This is certainly an evolving project with many voices eager to contribute. It could be the purview of several hounds with distributed responsibilities-- but I'll leave this to someone else to decide. I plan to turn this over to one person primarily and let that person decide where to go.
A caveat here: once the chowhound mods see this post, they may step in with their own ideas and suggestions. They've been very lenient with me and pretty much let me drive the car. I'll let you know if I hear from them about this, or they may choose to post here, too.
Thanks to all of you for your enthusiasm and participation. This has blossomed into a much larger effort than I thought it would all those months ago. You've introduced me to some great cookbooks and given me great notes on recipes to try. I hope to be cooking alongside you more in the months to come--
The original comment has been removed
hats off to you and much gratitude for your brilliant idea of us cooking together and then spearheading organizing the cookbook of the month project. It's been great fun -- some months better than others -- but hey, that's part of just jumping in and see who joins in!
I'd like to see the cookbook of the month project continue on, if others are interested and motivated. Since no one yet has volunteered, I am willing to step in to volunteer to organize for the next 3-4 months. But I want to know: do fellow hounds want to see this project continue, and also is anyone interested in colaberating w/ me on this?
I would also be interested in continuing this project. I've discovered cookbooks that I wouldn't have seen otherwise. This project has definitely given focus to my cooking. It's also helped me become more organized in planning my meals. And, it's forced me to cook things that I wouldn't generally gravitate to. Plus, there is always something to learn.
I see Candy's point about the verbose cookbooks. Me, I just skip the stuff in the beginning (or the end) and jump right to the recipes.
I can do that. I am just usually diametrically opposite to what the group wants. Been cooking too long I guess. I don't want overly verbose books. Too much intro (60-80 pages makes me nuts) over explaining also makes me close a book and not buy. I am a fan of the very straight forward and elegant book
Yes! Continue. First, a great huge thanks to RWB!
Now I'm wondering if there can be a couple of choices for cookbook of the month. I mean running simultaneously. How much work is it to keep this going and would it be that much more difficult to add a second cookbook?
Especially if the book chosen is a specialty - like desserts only. If that's the case, couldn't we have another cookbook for savory dishes?
Thanks so much for spearheading this project, redwood2bay. You have done an amazing job of organizing. I'm not in a position to help coordinate right now, but I just wanted to go on record saying that I hope the project continues in some capacity. I haven't consistently participated in cooking as much as I would have liked, but I'm always reading right along.
I agree w/ those who suggest that we keep it at one book a month. I feel like the months go by so quickly that trying to cram two books in would be overwhelming (at least for me).
That said, I've thought that people might want to start "unofficial" cookalongs if there's a book they'd really like to cook from that probably won't be considered for COM anytime soon. For instance, since Martha's cookbook didn't get chosen, there was still a thread that got started that I and others were able to share notes about.
I personally like to have threads organized by cookbook; it fits w/ my little brain. Thanks again for all your efforts!
re: Carb Lover
When I said 2 cookbooks, I wasn't saying that folks should cook from both (unless they wanted to). I tend to be much less interested in single theme books (Baking, canning, braising, etc.) and would have really liked an alternative since two of the chosen books have been single topic-esque.
If it's overwhelming, of course we won't do it, but the work would only be for the Captain of the Ship who set up the thread posts. 2 books would be no problem for any participant, since she/he could choose one or the other or neither.
this method of looking at cookbooks makes me want to have *lots* of simultaneous books up -- like the Rose bakery thing we were talking about, oakjoan
I'm not asking for anybody to administrate that -- just enjoying the way of interacting on different books/recipes
I'm also really fond of old threads from previous months still being "in play"
both for when I'm not cooking at the same rate
or I'm not into whatever is up that month