Indian in the Annex: Mt. Everest vs. Nataraj
For many years I was a big fan of the Nataraj, on Bloor St. in the Annex. But 3-4 years ago I stopped going - the food and the service had gone downhill, and it just wasn't a good experience anymore.
The other day, I finally tried Mt. Everest, the North Indian / Nepalese place across the street. What a revelation! The Aloo Tama Bodi ("very popular mountain dish," says the menu) was especially good, and the various curries we had were superb
Anyone else have thoughts on Mt. Everest vs. Nataraj?
-
-
-
I didn't like Nataraj the one time I ate there, last summer. Mt. Everest tastes much fresher, and it's worth going just for the tandoori sizzling platters, especially the tandoori vegetable. I think I remember paneer on that platter (yum!), but it's not listed on their online menu.
-
An update as I finally got to try Mount Everest. I agree that it tops Nataraj, but still put Trimurti slightly ahead - for most items.
Overall, I found the spicing at Mt Everest very mild. The lamb dishes also featured rather tough lamb, although it was still tasty.
The Onion Bhaji (my standard test for Indian restaurants) was OK, but didn't zing. The batter was a little soggy and the onions didn't taste as sweet as those at Trimurti. It was served on a bed of lettuce with carrot and tomato at the side - not coincidentally an identical presentation was used for 3 of the four courses we ordered. They were also finished with a too-liberal application of salt (probably garam masala salt) - and the identical finish was used on the 'Indian Fries' - which were also a litle soggy.
The chicken was a great step up. Juicy and tasty - as good as I've had in Indian restaurants. But the highlight was the Onion Kulcha - absolute medley of textures and flavours. Crunchy sweet onions, well-spiced, wonderfully greasy. A must! The naan, on the other hand was unexceptional. But as the sauces were bland, it didn't really matter as I didn't bother mopping them up.
Prices are about the same at both Trimurti and Mt Everest.
For the future, if I want more spices I'd choose Trimurti, and their lamb is better too. The chicken at Mt Everest is really good and the Onion Kulcha is outstanding.
But tipping the scales for me is the Onion Bhaji - Trimurti wins hands down on that item and so that's still my #1. -
-
Nataraj is still good (we especially like their murgh sai korma, the chicken dish with cream and fruit). It feels like home because it's been there so long and we always used to go.
But Mt. Everest is now the better of the two, I'd say. Try their chicken tikka masala -- really complex flavours and moist cubes of chicken. IIRC they had an awesome rice pudding too!
-
-
-
-
re: hungryabbey
Rashnaa is on Wellesley, just east of Parliament, in Cabbagetown. It's Sri Lankan, hence similar to south Indian, and thus very different from Trimurti. If Trimurti is run by the old Nataraj guys as mentioned above, their strength is north Indian. It's a matter of preference, really.
-
-
re: hungryabbey
You're probably better off with north Indian, then. More hearty meat curries. But check out the menu at Rashnaa and see if it appeals: http://www.rashnaa.com
-
-
re: hungryabbey
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in responding but I had to uninstall Explorer 7 in order to use the Reply feature here.
At Trimurti I recommend the Onion Bhajia appetiser (big enough for two) and try one of the cashew paste entrees such as Lamb Pasanda (although have to admit that the lamb was tough on one recent visit). Also the stuffed breads are excellent.
If (when?) you do try Rashnaa, then for sure try a Masala Dhosa (sort of a spicy potato wrap/crepe) and then pick from, say, a String Hopper and/or Kottu Roti. Rashnaa specializes in vegetarian food, but meat options are also available.And I don't 'do' buffets, especially if they have chicken (long story, but the Toronto General Hospital was involved) so can't compare Trimurti with Mt Everest (but do plan on trying Mt Everest sometime for a meal if it's as good as people say).
-
-
-
-
re: hungryabbey
so I went to Trimurti and my feelings are kiiiiinda divided. First of all, we went pretty early so at first it was just us and one other table of ONE person.. yet still, the service for taking orders both for food and drinks was pretttty slow, like I kept trying to get his attention and he would just walk by us over and over. But thats not too big of a deal. They served us some really crunchy thin bread (Im sorry I dont know what its called) with a couple different sauces/relishes which were really good I thought. To start we got some subzi samosas (2.95 for 2 HUGE samosas) and they were reallly good, some of the best Ive had I think, though I still think Queen Mother has some of the best.. and we also got the garlic kulcha roti which was EXCELLENT, I mean I could live off it.. so we ordered a couple rice dishes (to tame the spice haha one just plain basmati (2.50) and basmati with veggies (4.50). We all got our own mains we couldnt really agree to share so two of us got the gosht kadai which was lamb with potatoes, onions, tomatoes, red peppers and spices at medium spice (9.50). It was really good though a BIT too thick a curry for me, I like a litttle bit more sauce. One of us ordered the murgh kadai which was chicken, potatoes, red peppers with fried onions and spices, and I think I liked hers better (9.50 also). And one of us got the seekh kabab with beef (9.50) which was done in the tandoor. I tried this too and it was very very flavourful, I really have never tasted anything like it, and Im not sure if its a taste i LOVE or dont really like at all haha. All in all, even though its been a while since Ive been to Sher-e-punjab, I still think I like it better. Though for 85$ for all that, 4 pops and 2 beers, you really cant beat it! Thanks for the rec, I did enjoy it, next time Im gonna have to go to the lunch buffet to try out some more dishes.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-



