Notes from IMW Champagne Tasting in San Francisco
- Melanie Wong Sep 20, 2006 07:46 AM
On Monday I placed an excited call from the Ferry Building, "Richard, I'm in Champagne heaven! You gotta come by this afternoon, three different Krugs are open, Bollinger RD, Dom Perignon Oenotheque . . . " The public tasting included 35 houses and nearly 90 different wines enjoyed from Riedel crystal flutes. Now totally guilt-ridden for not telling more of my friends in San Francisco about it, I'll post my "quick and dirty" notes so that they'll remember to come next year. And, hopefully the New Yorkers will catch the event next week in Manhattan (hint: www.localwineevents.com)
The styles represented included non-vintage, vintage, rosé, blanc de blancs, prestige cuvée, and sweeter (dosé). Concerned that some of the top bottlings might disappear, I started with the vintage, then prestige cuvees, and then b de b, nv, rose, and dose. I mention it because this may have had the effect of underrating the non-vintage wines. As one of my tasting companions quipped, "We'd be happy drinking just about any of these in a lounge somewhere, but compared to Salon, well..." Anyway, here goes, in order of tasting (with * next to my favorites) -
Bollinger Grande Annee 1997 - EXCELLENT, bold, robust, creamy, toasty vanilla, smoke-filled rooms, earthy Pinot Noir dominating, very long, soft finish
Nicolas Feuillatte Cuvee Speciale 1999 - VERY GOOD minus, fruity, youthful, lacking complexity
Piper Heidsieck 1998 - EXCELLENT, very creamy and lavish mousse, green apple snap, refreshing personality
Lanson Gold Label 1997 - VERY GOOD minus, frothy bead, zingy unripe acid, touch metallic
Bruno Paillard 1996 - GOOD plus, disappointing for the year, steely, lean, vegetal, very tart, unripe character
Taittinger Brut 1999 - VERY GOOD plus, flowery nose, quit pale, somewhat coarse in the mouth, slight astringency in finish
Vilmart Grand Cellier d'Or 1998 - EXCELLENT, very ripe and rich biscuity nose, medium toast, touch sweet in the finish overshooting the acidity
*Bollinger RD 1995 - EXCELLENT plus, full-blow biscuity nose, thick textured, floral high tones and earthy Pinot Noir depth, harmonious, very good length
*Veuve Clicquot La Grande Dame 1996 - EXCELLENT plus - vivid nose with white flowers and chalky minerals, intense yet light, statuesque and graceful carriage, most feminine of the lot, years to go
Comte Audoin de Dampierre, Family Reserve Grand Cru Ficelee a l'Ancienne 2000 - VERY GOOD, too young, hollow middle, lean and mean currently
Nicolas Feuillatte Cuvee 225, Eleve en fut de chene 1997 - VERY GOOD minus, not integrated, gangly impression, citrusy, green streak
Nicolas Feuillatte Palmes d'Or 1997 - VERY GOOD plus, restrained, closed in, very good length and weight, but little expression now
Krug Grand Cuvee NV - EXCELLENT minus, creamy, toasty, shrieking acidity, needs time to integrate, slight vegetal notes in aftertaste
Krug 1995 - EXCELLENT plus, fat with vanilla and autolytic character, medium straw yellow, almost waxy in texture, touch of honey, somewhat clipped finish in relation to volume, bit low in acid, but so deliciously complex
*Krug Rose - EXCELLENT plus, the palest of the pale with the faintest blush of pink, sweet floral nose, exquisitely delicate, mineral-driven, excellent length, clean and crisp ending
Lanson Noble Cuvee 1997 - VERY GOOD plus, bit of tannic etch, full-bodied, crisp acidity
Lanson Noble Cuvee Blanc de Blancs 1997 - VERY GOOD, very floral and sweet nose, less intense and interesting on palate
Perrier-Jouet, Fleur de Champagne, Blanc de Blancs 1999 - VERY GOOD minus, verging on overripe, low on acidity, flaccid, dumb?
Perrier-Jouet Fleur de Champagne, Rosé 1999 - GOOD plus, skunky, bitter aftertaste
Dom Perignon 1998 - EXCELLENT, lithe, graceful, great carriage, seems sweeter than the others
*Dom Perignon Oenotheque 1990 - OUTSTANDING, disgorged in 2003, full-blown winey nose, extremely complex and generous, toasted nuts, autumnal smoke, baked fruits, full and weighty, fat finish, vibrant acidity, truly majestic
*Philipponat Clos des Goisses 1996 - OUTSTANDING minus, my first encounter with this bottling for a wonderful discovery, great nose, perfect for drinking now, brioche, chalky minerals, floral, layered and long on the palate, great presence, creamy rich finish
*Salon 1996 Blanc de Blancs - OUTSTANDING, tiny pinpoint bead, light silken texture, higher acidity for many more years in the cellar, snappy verve yet remarkable refinement, great persistence
Taittinger Comtes de Champagne Blanc de Blanc 1998 - EXCELLENT, very pale, backward, youthful and undeveloped, sizzling acidity, sugar protrudes in the end, very long
Taittinger Comtes de Champagne Rose 1999 - EXCELLENT minus, prickly personality, not integrated enough yet for drinking, very flavorful, excellent length
BRUT BLANC DE BLANCS VINTAGE AND NON-VINTAGE:
Besserat de Bellefon Cuvee des Moines NV - GOOD plus, dirt, earth, clunky
Chartogne-Taillet NV - EXCELLENT minus, rich vanilla-laced nose, bread dough, very complete and satisfying
Comte Audoin de Dampierre Grand Cru NV - VERY GOOD, basic, fruity, not much complexity or individuality
Delamotte 1999 - VERY GOOD minus, correct but lacking personality, bland-ish, lacks depth
Pascal Doquet Grand Cru NV - GOOD plus, green streak, awkward
Pascal Doquet Grand Cru 1997 - GOOD plus, green, vegetal, more body
Pierre Gimonnet Cuvee Gastronome 2000 - EXCELLENT minus, young, good potential, very good balance but needs time to integrate
Pierre Peters Cuvee de Reserve NV - VERY GOOD minus, pretty nose, briny/bitter aftertaste
Charles Heidsieck Blanc des Millenaires 1995 - EXCELLENT minus, toasty, full-bodied, dripping with autolytic character, well-detailed, very creamy texture, goes down easy
A. R. Lenoble Grand Cru NV - VERY GOOD minus, slightly funky, awkward
A. R. Lenoble Grand Cru 1996 - VERY GOOD minus, lacking sufficient precision
*Ruinart NV - EXCELLENT plus, bold nose, full-on richness on the palate, power and intensity, creamy mousse, remarkable depth, surprisingly vivid b de b personality despite size and volume
Besserat de Bellefon Cuvee des Moines - GOOD minus, overtly sweet, overly oxidized, gummy finish
Bollinger Special Cuvee - EXCELLENT minus, house-style to the max
Veuve Clicquot Yellow Label - VERY GOOD plus, mouth-filling, strikes a happy medium
Delamotte - VERY GOOD minus, again correct with good balance and no flaws, but little character
Rene Geoffroy Cuvee Selectionnee - VERY GOOD plus, lavish bread dough and toast, twingy acidity
Gosset Grande Reserve - EXCELLENT minus, low pressure, fuller and deeper with more aged character, missing a little lengthwise
Charles Heidsieck Reserve - EXCELLENT minus, flashy, very forward but falls off in finish
Lallement - VERY GOOD minus, minty, herbal notes
A. R. Lenoble Nature - VERY GOOD plus, fuller fruit and much more character than the b de b's, good balance, crisp and full ending, bone dry
*Jean Milan Cuvee Speciale - EXCELLENT, very complex, rich, forceful, deep and penetrating
Bruno Paillard Premiere Cuvee - VERY GOOD minus, bland and boring but without fault
Perrier-Jouet Grand Brut - VERY GOOD minus, high-toned, modest finish
*Philipponnat Royale Reserve - EXCELLENT, creamy mouse, layers and layers of flavor, seamless blending, great harmony, very pleasurable
Taittinger La Francaise - GOOD, skunky, metallic clink
Taittinger Prelude - EXCELLENT, has it all, great richness of fruit and autolysis, powerful yet polished
BRUT ROSES VINTAGE AND NON-VINTAGE:
Besserat de Bellefon Civee des Moines - faulty, dirty, microbial taint
Veuve Clicquot NV - VERY GOOD minus, muted and sulking
Veuve Clicquot 1999 - VERY GOOD plus, lovely nose, intense fruitiness, light step, good length, refreshing
Delamotte NV - VERY GOOD minus, gummy aftertaste
Pascal Doquet 1er cru NV - GOOD minus, brandy aromas, harsh alcohol, out of balanced hotness
Nicolas Feuillatte NV - VERY GOOD minus, very fruity nose, but lacking finesse, chunky and clunky
Piper Heidsieck Rosé Sauvage NV - GOOD, darkest purple-maive hue, metallic, marred by rotten eggs aroma
Lanson Rosé Label NV - VERY GOOD plus, crisp and steely, light body, bright flavors
Moet et Chandon Imperial NV - VERY GOOD minus, sweeter, gummy finish
Bruno Paillard Premiere Cuvee NV - VERY GOOD minus, coarse, some tannin etch
Perrier-Jouet Blason NV - VERY GOOD minus, clean, precise, pleasantly boring
*Philipponnat Reserve Rosé NV - EXCELLENT, full-flavored yet not ponderous, good carriage, mellowed acidity, harmonious
*Ruinart NV - EXCELLENT plus, great breed, plenty of fruit supported by minerality, creamy texture, precise, great persistence
*Taittinger Prestige NV - EXCELLENT minus, well-fruited in a restrained way, chalky minerals, elegant
Veuve Clicquot Demi Sec NV - GOOD plus, sweetness overtakes other elements, not much else
Moet et Chandon Extra Sec NV White Star - GOOD plus, coarse
Moet et Chandon Demi Sec NV Nectar Imperial - VERY GOOD, steely minerality, sufficient acidity to balance sweetness
Moet et Chandon Demi Sec Rosé NV Nectar Imperial - VERY GOOD minus, pleasant, simple
Taittinger Sec NV Nocturne - VERY GOOD plus, toasty, some complexity and backbone for interplay with sweetness
. . . and that's all I can type.
Heheh, and you're sounding Clive Coates-ish, indeed yourself!
For Champagne, the ratings band is pretty narrow as the overall quality of the region and also what gets imported to this county is quite high. There was one wine in this bunch that got no rating as it was too defective for consideration, and no second bottle was open for comparison.
For those who like numbers, the scale is approximately
96 to 100 points - Outstanding
90 to 95 points - Excellent
85 to 89 points - Very Good
80 to 84 points - Good
re: Ruth Lafler
All of the wines are available at retail in the US. I have the list of distributors for California, but pooped out from any more typing! No pricing information was provided so without a bunch of research, I can't give you a thorough answer on QPR (quality price ration). But, I've just checked winesearcher.com for the Riunart blanc de blancs, and at $52 at Wine Club, that's would be way up there.
re: Ruth Lafler
Yes, that's exactly what creamy means. The difficult trade-off though is that the creaminess comes with bottle age and/or extended time on the lees, and with bottle age, you get more of the toasty and honeyed character. If you want to avoid yeasty and toasty (aka brioche, bread dought, autolysis, biscuit (which is shortbread-y things to Brits), etc.), then I suggest rosé champagnes.
The very chic and trendy things these days is to DECANT champagne. Not my idea of a good time, but maybe you'll like the wine that way. It takes an excellent bottle to still taste good flat.
Hope those within striking distance of NYC take advantage of the opportunity on Monday. Same tasting, actually more wines as some of them didn't make it to SF in time. Initially was crabby that I didn't have access to the Pol Roger line-up (including Winston Churchill), but it was indeed an embarssment of riches for a measly $35.
In a similar vein, K&L is holding a Fete du Champagne -- Champagne Tasting -- in San Francisco, on October 21.
I know nothing in addition to the info on the website, but they are clearly pouring wines currently available from the Champagne region (no Cali/Spanish/etc).
Wish I had known about this event, but I'll cross-check Melanie's ratings against my own for any that are poured at the K&L event.
We attended the 3-5 tasting so we missed Melanie. I don't really have much to add except that it was absolutely awesome and a screaming deal. We didn't get through nearly as many wines as Melanie did, but then we're not as laser-focused.
Two things stood out for me:
1) Over the past few years, I've been focused on the small grower-producers so I haven't had many big house champagnes lately. There were a lot of big names at this tasting and it was great to taste them. I'll definitely have to make room for them in my champagne budget (especially the Bollinger RD and my old love, Ruinart).
2) We noticed was how important the "serving condition" of the wine is to our personal enjoyment....
First, since we were the second tasting, the initial wines had been open an indeterminate amount of time and seemed flatter. On several occasions we tasted the "bottom" of bottle and then retasted the same wine when a new one was opened. We vastly preferred the "fresh" bottles, I can't even begin imagine decanting champagne.
Second, the wines were in buckets with ice & water. Some of the buckets had more ice/water than others and once a bottle was half empty (or so) so that all the wine was under the ice/water level, the wine was much colder. On multiple occasions, we held the wine to warm it up slightly, and on a couple of occasions we went back to a wine that needed cooling down.
I think it was more noticeable because we were able to compare these conditions side-by-side. Certainly at home my champagne starts to go flat and varies in temperature as I drink it, its just a gradual process and thus less noticeable.