<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<topic>
  <id>313259</id>
  <title>Coke ...</title>
  <published_at>Fri Jul 28 23:06:19 -0700 2006</published_at>
  <post_count>1</post_count>
  <board>
    <id>31</id>
    <name>Home Cooking</name>
  </board>
  <posts>
    <post>
      <post>
        <level>0</level>
        <id>1774502</id>
        <content>I've never posted on this board, because I don't cook much.

But I came across this recipe for Coke (yep, Coke) and I thought I'd share it:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/food/Story/0,,1832135,00.html</content>
        <published_at>Fri Jul 28 23:06:19 -0700 2006</published_at>
        <parent_id></parent_id>
        <user>
          <id>10914</id>
          <name>PaulF</name>
        </user>
      </post>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>1775141</id>
      <content>Hmmmmm... interesting.  I could see how acacia might have tripped them up as there are so many grades of it.

As much as I find it an interesting experiment, I'm more than a little skeptical that it tastes anything like coke.

I'm quite certain that companies with more resources than these two women and their friends have attempted to duplicate coke. If a company with access to vast taste testing focus groups and laboratory equipment can't re-create coke, I don't see how a handful of people can.

This type of "if I think it tastes like the real thing, then is MUST taste like the real thing" runs rampant through the copycat community. And it doesn't do it much service. Re-creating commercial products is a lot more complicated than throwing a few ingredients together in a kitchen- with or without the presence of a scientific advisor.</content>
      <published_at>Sat Jul 29 12:25:51 -0700 2006</published_at>
      <parent_id>1774502</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>13805</id>
        <name>scott123</name>
      </user>
    </post>
  </posts>
</topic>
