-
-
There is some truth in it...at high temps compounds called heterocyclic aromatic amines can form on foods...burning fat (like from meat drippings) can also form polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons...but the good news is that beer, especially dark beer, can counteract any damage (according to Japanese researchers).
I have more details on one of my bbq pages...
Jim›1 Reply -
A chef I once worked with told me that a piece of meat can be rare in the center, medium farther from the center and well-done on the outside. His opinion, and I agree, was that if the meat is of sufficient quality, all three areas will taste good.
I say all that in prelude to my admission that I am extremely fond of carmelization. I like the taste of sugar cooked to 340 degrees. I particularly enjoy blackened ends of prime rib, the tops of muffins, the outside of bagels and anything that sticks to the bottom of the pan.
As far as Jewish-mother paranoia, all I can say is that My Jewish mother would not allow me or my sister to eat the carmelized onions that were cooked during the chicken fat rendering process. She daid they were not good for me. The only thing that I was unable to understand was, howcome she could eat them›5 Replies -
VERY TRUE!!! Always eat your meat rare or medium, NEVER WELL DONE!!! Unless you don't care about your health.
›5 Replies-
re: Huey
The food police say there is a link, especially if the food is actually carbonized (burnt black), and the best way to avoid the risk if you like well-done meat is to marinate it.
On the other hand, they say happiness and smiling faces are life-extending, which I always factor into any health-related choice.-
-
re: Huey
Not at all. I was speaking generally, as in I do not rule out butter or meat in favor of health. To me, the "right" way to cook red meat over a grill involves substantial heat, though the center should be almost as nature found it. My point was more a philosophical one than a recommendation to eat burnt food, i.e., if if makes you happy, it can't be that bad.
-
-
re: lucia
"Food police" is one of those epithets that always make me wonder why people--including chowhounds--of good will can't have different attitudes toward risk-taking as well as different risk factors that influence their choices without calling each other names.
Most of those I've known who took a high-handed approach to the riskier aspects of gourmetdom (raw/undercooked fish, shellfish, meat/poultry; burnt foods; certain oysters; saturated fat, etc.) had yet to go eye to eye with the Grim Reaper. As the saying goes, it concentrates the mind (and the tastebuds).
-
-